Individual Economists

Fed Accompli Fail: Powell Pontification Prompts Puke In Stocks & Bonds

Zero Hedge -

Fed Accompli Fail: Powell Pontification Prompts Puke In Stocks & Bonds

Inflation is not 'going gently into that good night'.

Instead, as PPI confirmed today after CPI yesterday, it is 'burning and raging at the dying of the light' of the Biden/Harris days...

Source: Bloomberg

In fact - while he was more ambiguous at The Fed presser, Fed Chair Powell admitted in his remarks today that all is not completely awesome, as he warned The Fed is in "no hurry" to cut rates... and inflation's on a "bumpy path".

"If the data let's us go slower, it seems like the right thing to do..."

Powell's remarks sent rate-cut expectations notably lower - December less than 50-50 now...

Source: Bloomberg

Interestingly, minutes before Powell spoke, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon dropped some tape-bombs of reality:

  • *DIMON: THINK THE CHANCE OF SOFT LANDING LESS THAN OTHERS THINK

  • *DIMON: "NOT SO OPTIMISTIC" THAT INFLATION WILL GO AWAY QUICKLY

  • *DIMON: GROWTH IS BEST POLICY TO FIX DEFICIT PROBLEM

  • *DIMON: TRUMP INHERITING INFLATION THAT MAY NOT GO AWAY QUICKLY

Goldman notes that the background remains bullish for stocks from CTAs / Buybacks / Seasonals:

  • CTA: Update for Equities - buyers of S&P in all short-term scenarios as momentum remains firmly positive and realized vol has reset: flat tape: +$4.8mm to BUY (+$7.5bn SPX to BUY).

  • Buybacks: We are reaching full open window. Back of envelope we estimate ~$6B/day in demand.

  • Seasonality: The typical pattern is to rally into the Inauguration (1/20/2025) before topping out in February.

Source: Goldman Sachs

But, Goldman's trading desk notes that there is a lot of selling still:

  • Overall activity levels are down -15% vs. the trailing 2 weeks with market volumes up +8% vs the 10dma

  • Our floor tilts -3% better for sale with both HFs and LOs leaning that way

  • HFs are -7% better for sale, moderating after an earlier sell skew closer to 10% (which ranked in the 95th %-ile).  They are heavily for sale in HCare & Industrials with very modest demand for Macro Products, REITs and Energy.

  • LOs are -5% better for sale.  Tech supply stands out, on a net basis larger than Comm Svcs & Industrials supply combined.  LOs are better to buy across Cons Disc, REITs & HCare

Stocks were already sinking before Powell spoke, but his reality check punched them to the lows with Small Caps clubbed like a baby seal...

The 'Trump Trade' saw some profit-taking today...

Source: Bloomberg

'Most Shorted' stocks fell once again - erasing the entire post-election squeeze higher...

Source: Bloomberg

RIVN was monkeyhammered lower after headlines that the Trump team would remove the EV tax credit

Vaxx makers were all slammed as Trump RFK Jr headlines hit...

Treasury yields exploded higher on Powell's comments, led by the short-end...

Source: Bloomberg

That prompted a major flattening in the yield curve...

Source: Bloomberg

The dollar knee-jerked higher on Powell's comments

Source: Bloomberg

Gold ended the day unchanged, bouncing back back from continued overnight selling in Asia...

Source: Bloomberg

This pattern is similar to that seen in 2016's sweep...

Bitcoin ended the day marginally lower after Powell's comments (pushed down first by PPI), but found support around $88,000...

Source: Bloomberg

Crude prices also ended unchanged - seemingly running out of fuel for any breakout trades... for now...

Source: Bloomberg

Finally, does this chart - showing initial jobless claims (inverted) tumbling to six-month lows and inflation surprise data soaring - support any kind of rate-cutting cycle?

Source: Bloomberg

How pissed will Trump be if Powell's first action is actually to hike rates?

Tyler Durden Thu, 11/14/2024 - 16:00

A Plan To Tame Inflation

Zero Hedge -

A Plan To Tame Inflation

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

There is finally some chance for honesty now, after four years of gaslighting, especially when it comes to economic conditions. For all this time, we’ve heard nothing from official spokespeople, agencies, and the national media that inflation is cooling, calming, disappearing, improving, and you name the verb. It’s been anything but worsening, at least that’s what we’ve been told. 

We emerge from the miasma of these terrible years and what happens? The newest inflation data appears and it is still awful, even worse than before. All told, the U.S. dollar’s purchasing power is down in official data by 22 cents over four years. 

That’s what we are being told, and that’s terrible enough. The reality is likely worse once you add in interest rates, shrinkflation, new fees, and housing insurance. That gets us closer to 40 cents and more. 

Let us please let go of any doubts about the cause.

Elon Musk summarizes:

“The excess government spending is what causes inflation! ALL government spending is taxation. This is a very important concept to appreciate. It is either direct taxation, like income tax, or indirect via inflation due to increasing the money supply.”

It comes down to the machinery that prints money. Congress authorizes spending, the government mints the debt, and the Fed buys it with money that it creates out of thin air. The result is that all existing monetary units are reduced in value, same as when you mix juice with water. 

It’s not that complicated actually, especially when the new money is distributed in the form of direct stimulus payments to individuals and businesses. That’s exactly what happened. 

Where do we stand right now? There is some heavy risk of a second wave coming next year. On the current trajectory, that is where we are headed. The Fed has fed another $1.1 trillion in fake money into the system in the last 12 months. The Treasury has created new debt as never before, probably in hopes of ginning up the GDP prior to the election. The trick did not work but now the public is stuck with the bill of $35 trillion. 

Inflation is a wicked beast that cannot be controlled directly. On the campaign trail, Trump spoke often about how it was the throttling of the energy sector that kicked off inflation. That is only partially true in the sense that the soaring price of oil and gas grew the costs of transportation. It was also a symptom rather than a cause. Plus, the price of oil and gas is actually not high right now in real terms. 

Yes, the plan of “drill baby drill” is necessary and should happen but it cannot fix the existing problem of inflation much less do much to forestall a second wave. Nor is there a viable fix in the idea of price control, even when it is masked as “anti-gouging” legislation. 

There is nothing government can do to directly control prices, much less force them from going up given the deep structural problems. 

There are ways to mitigate against the problem, or at least minimizing them. You can have a look at how Javier Milei did it in Argentina. He took the problem of massive hyperinflation and converted it to low inflation in a year. His is a case study.

The answer is:

  1. end debt creation by dramatic spending cuts,

  2. curb the actions of the central bank,

  3. and inspire economic growth through deregulation and agency elimination. 

That’s three steps.

Let’s consider each. 

First, the end of debt creation is essential.

Every time Congress authorizes more spending than is in the bank, the Treasury has to float debt to make it happen. That is the statutory obligation. What that means is that Congress needs to pass a balanced budget, ideally right away. 

That comes down to the commission created by Elon Musk: the Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE. It is not an official department. It works as an outside advisory team. That’s excellent. They will likely push for a “Twitter-style” solution of firing 4 in 5 government workers to reduce costs directly. 

That’s a start but it is not enough. There also must be sweeping elimination of agencies, each of which can save tens of billions and possibly a trillion or more in total. That needs to happen immediately. It can happen through executive order or through legislation. One way or another, the spending in excess of revenue has to stop. 

Trump is not famous for being a budget cutter. He cared nothing for the topic in his first term. He was vulnerable after March 2020 to believing that multiple trillions could be spent without consequence to keep the economy floating during lockdowns. That was an error. He will never admit to it. 

This time, however, he has a strong reason to dramatically cut the federal budget. This much he can know for sure: every dime cut from the federal budget is likely to end the flow of money to people who are working to undermine his administration. In saying that, I’m in no way promoting the politics of revenge but rather drawing attention to political realities. Balancing the budget has the side benefit of defunding the opposition. 

Second, if the Treasury stops the T-bill tsunami, the Fed will not be called upon to sponge up the excess with money creation.

You can look at the charts over the last year and see how the Biden/Harris administration was spending and working with the Fed to promote more economic illusion going into the election. That was the whole point of the rate cuts. That really must come to an end. 

There is a danger that comes with taking away the punch bowl. It could mean a panic by the bond market and a push by the media to announce the Trump Recession. 

This is why it is imperative that the Trump team move quickly to explain that right now, the economy is in much worse shape than has been advertised. The pit is very deep and it would be good to dial back expectations of a quick recovery. 

We don’t need a falling rate of money growth. We just need stability now. That’s not going to stop the wave of price increases for the next year but it can stop it from getting worse and end it completely by 2026. There is at this point zero need to worry about “deflation,” despite what the financial press will be screaming. Quite frankly, deflation at this point would be a gift to American consumers in any case.

Third, Trump needs to fire up the wealth-creation engine of the American economy through dramatic, sweeping, historic levels of regulation torching plus the shock and awe of full agency elimination, same as in Argentina.

The Trump team needs a list of 100 agencies to eliminate immediately but that should just be a start. Another 100 should be on the chopping block. Without all the regulatory clogging that they cause, investment will soar. 

Tax cuts–income and capital–will assist here too. The crucial point is the focus on boosting supply and jobs as a way of outrunning inflationary forces. Here again, the financial press will scream about the economy “overheating” but that metaphor is worn out. The effect of economic growth on inflation is exactly the opposite. Economic growth can bury the effects of price increases. 

There is not a lot of time, and it is a bargain that the Trump administration will surely lose if it does not act decisively and quickly. The debt creation and money creation must end and the economic growth through agency elimination and deregulation must become the top priority. All of this has the added advantage of making Trump more popular with the people who elected him. 

There is no incompatibility between political success and economic rationality. In this case, the incoming Trump administration is very fortunate: they go together. 

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Thu, 11/14/2024 - 15:45

Israel & US Ramp Up Airstrikes On Syria As 'Counter Iran' War Expands

Zero Hedge -

Israel & US Ramp Up Airstrikes On Syria As 'Counter Iran' War Expands

Israeli attacks on Syria have become daily, and now the United States is ramping up its own attacks in the northeast of the country as well.

On Thursday Israeli warplanes launched attacks on two residential buildings in the Damascus suburbs - one in Mazzeh and the other in Qudsaya, which lies west of the capital. Regional reports said that many people were killed, and Syrian state SANA posted photos of bombed-out apartments.

Israeli Army Radio in a rare acknowledgement appeared to confirm the Israeli attack while claiming the fresh attacks targeted the Syrian headquarters the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) group, which is fighting alongside Hamas in Gaza, and has held Israeli citizens captive since Oct.7, 2023.

Getty Images

Al Jazeera reports on the rising death toll as emergency crews comb through the rubble

At least 15 people have been killed and 16 injured in Israeli attacks on suburbs of the Syrian capital, according to a Syrian military source cited by the SANA news agency.

We have reported earlier that one building was hit in the suburb of Mazzeh and the other in Qudssaya, west of Damascus.

Israel had launched multiple airstrikes on Syria last week as well, and in the past weeks has even struck coastal targets near Tartus and Latakia - an area where Russian military forces are present.

Israel's air war against Syria is nothing new, but more rare these days are US air raids on Syria. This week has already seen at least two separate actions by CENTCOM forces which are supporting Kurds in the Deir Ezzor region:

US Central Command announced that its forces launched strikes in Syria for a second day on Tuesday against “Iranian-aligned” targets, referring to Shia militias that operate in the country.

CENTCOM said in a press release that its forces “conducted strikes against an Iranian-backed militia group’s weapons storage and logistics headquarters facility.” It said the strikes came after a “rocket attack on US personnel at Patrol Base Shaddadi,” referring to a US occupation base in eastern Syria.

One war monitor said that at least five members of the Iran-aligned militia were killed in the US airstrikes. These locations which come under US attack often include Syrian national militias, or even Syrian Army personnel.

Four other militants were killed the day prior, Monday, when CENTCOM said it hit "nine targets in two locations associated with Iranian groups in Syria."

The week kicked off with regional reports of explosions at US bases, likely the result of missiles or mortars being used to attack US troops. Such attacks by militias in the area have been somewhat a regular occurrence, but these instances don't always make headlines in the West.

All of this is part of the broader proxy war between the pro-Iran 'resistance axis' and the US-Israel-Gulf powers. Currently there are still some 1,000 or more US troops occupying eastern Syria. Trump during his first term said he wanted to bring the troops home, and it's unclear if this will remain a priority during his second administration.

The longer the Pentagon stays, that more that US troops are put in harm's way - for little strategic purpose other than 'securing the oil' - as Trump has said before. But the Syrian Kurds could soon make their own peace deal with Damascus, making it easier to force out the American presence. Turkey has also long wanted to see the US go.

Tyler Durden Thu, 11/14/2024 - 15:25

FEC Chairman: Biden DOJ Broke Federal Policies With Letter Targeting Musk

Zero Hedge -

FEC Chairman: Biden DOJ Broke Federal Policies With Letter Targeting Musk

Authored by Eric Lendrum via American Greatness,

On Wednesday, the chairman of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) admitted that the outgoing Biden-Harris Department of Justice (DOJ) violated federal policies and illegally targeted “perceived political opponents” by sending a threatening letter to Elon Musk.

According to the Washington Examiner, FEC Chairman Sean Cooksey sent a letter to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, saying that the letter to Musk concerning his efforts to encourage people to support freedom of speech constituted an attempt “to intimidate and chill private citizens and organizations from campaigning on behalf of President Trump.”

Cooksey also recommended that Horowitz, along with the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), open investigations into the incident and “hold accountable any individuals responsible for any violations of federal law or department policies.”

The letter in question was sent to Musk by the DOJ just weeks before the election on November 5th.

In it, DOJ officials warned Musk’s America PAC that the pledge to give away $1 million every day to a randomly-selected voter who signed the PAC’s petition in support of freedom of speech was allegedly a violation of federal law.

The letter also accused Musk of making “a mockery of democracy.”

Musk defended his PAC’s actions, pointing out that participants at the time did “not need to register as Republicans or vote in the Nov. 5 elections.”

“The underlying motivation behind this stunt is obvious,” said Cooksey in his scathing letter to the DOJ.

“Employees of President Biden’s Department of Justice wanted to stop an independent political committee from campaigning for President Trump in crucial swing states just prior to election day.”

Cooksey further accused the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section of deliberately leaking the Musk letter to the New York Times, which was a violation of the department’s media policies.

“Writing such a letter and then leaking it also violates the department’s long-standing policy against the identification of uncharged parties and the disclosure of prejudicial information,” Cooksey continued.

Elon Musk, the founder and owner of Tesla and SpaceX, as well as the owner of the social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter), is the wealthiest man in the world. He was previously a Democrat who supported politicians such as Barack Obama, but has shifted further to the right in recent years, due primarily to the Democrats’ increasingly radical stances, including support for censorship and transgenderism. Musk gave his official endorsement of President-elect Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign following the assassination attempt against him on July 13th.

President-elect Trump has since announced that Musk, alongside businessman and former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, will lead an entirely new federal agency called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), with the purpose of significantly reducing the size of the federal government over the course of the next two years. The agency plans to complete its work by July 4th, 2026, which will be the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States.

Tyler Durden Thu, 11/14/2024 - 15:05

Fed Chair Powell: No "signals that we need to be in a hurry to lower rates"

Calculated Risk -

From Fed Chair Powell: Economic Outlook. Excerpt:
The recent performance of our economy has been remarkably good, by far the best of any major economy in the world. Economic output grew by more than 3 percent last year and is expanding at a stout 2.5 percent rate so far this year. ... The labor market remains in solid condition, having cooled off from the significantly overheated conditions of a couple of years ago, and is now by many metrics back to more normal levels that are consistent with our employment mandate.
...
We are moving policy over time to a more neutral setting. But the path for getting there is not preset. In considering additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, we will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks. The economy is not sending any signals that we need to be in a hurry to lower rates. The strength we are currently seeing in the economy gives us the ability to approach our decisions carefully. Ultimately, the path of the policy rate will depend on how the incoming data and the economic outlook evolve.
emphasis added

Watch: Fed Chair Powell Warns "Bumpy Path" Ahead For Inflation, 'No Hurry' To Lower Rates

Zero Hedge -

Watch: Fed Chair Powell Warns "Bumpy Path" Ahead For Inflation, 'No Hurry' To Lower Rates

On a day when producer prices confirmed what consumer prices warned yesterday - that the inflation genie is not back in the bottle - Fed Chair Jay Powell will be interviewed by WaPo reporter Catherine Powell at the Dallas Fed, presumably to reassure the world that he is 'independent', is not about to be fired by Trump, and that everything is awesome on the rate-cutting path.

Traders should expect Powell to reiterate the points he made at the FOMC press conference last week when he refused to provide specific guidance regarding the December meeting, stressed data-dependency and noted the Fed does not want to see further cooling in the labor market.

While hope remains high for the 'soft landing' narrative, today we see inflation resurgent at the same as jobless claims hit six-month lows...

Does that look like 'data' that would prompt The Fed to cut again in December?

Or will Powell be Burns 2.0?

Interestingly, minutes before Powell is set to speak, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon dropped some tape-bombs of reality:

  • *DIMON: THINK THE CHANCE OF SOFT LANDING LESS THAN OTHERS THINK

  • *DIMON: "NOT SO OPTIMISTIC" THAT INFLATION WILL GO AWAY QUICKLY

  • *DIMON: GROWTH IS BEST POLICY TO FIX DEFICIT PROBLEM

  • *DIMON: TRUMP INHERITING INFLATION THAT MAY NOT GO AWAY QUICKLY

Watch live (due to start at 1500ET)

Full prepared remarks below:

Good afternoon. Thank you to the World Affairs Council, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, and the Dallas Regional Chamber for the kind invitation to be with you today. I will start with some brief comments on the economy and monetary policy.

Looking back, the U.S. economy has weathered a global pandemic and its aftermath and is now back to a good place. The economy has made significant progress toward our dual-mandate goals of maximum employment and stable prices. The labor market remains in solid condition. Inflation has eased substantially from its peak, and we believe it is on a sustainable path to our 2 percent goal. We are committed to maintaining our economy's strength by returning inflation to our goal while supporting maximum employment.

Recent Economic Data

Economic growth

The recent performance of our economy has been remarkably good, by far the best of any major economy in the world. Economic output grew by more than 3 percent last year and is expanding at a stout 2.5 percent rate so far this year. Growth in consumer spending has remained strong, supported by increases in disposable income and solid household balance sheets. Business investment in equipment and intangibles has accelerated over the past year. In contrast, activity in the housing sector has been weak.

Improving supply conditions have supported this strong performance of the economy. The labor force has expanded rapidly, and productivity has grown faster over the past five years than its pace in the two decades before the pandemic, increasing the productive capacity of the economy and allowing rapid economic growth without overheating.

The labor market

The labor market remains in solid condition, having cooled off from the significantly overheated conditions of a couple of years ago, and is now by many metrics back to more normal levels that are consistent with our employment mandate. The number of job openings is now just slightly above the number of unemployed Americans seeking work. The rate at which workers quit their jobs is below the pre-pandemic pace, after touching historic highs two years ago. Wages are still increasing, but at a more sustainable pace. Hiring has slowed from earlier in the year. The most recent jobs report for October reflected significant effects from hurricanes and labor strikes, making it difficult to get a clear signal. Finally, at 4.1 percent, the unemployment rate is notably higher than a year ago but has flattened out in recent months and remains historically low.

Inflation

The labor market has cooled to the point where it is no longer a source of significant inflationary pressures. This cooling and the substantial improvement in broader supply conditions have brought inflation down significantly over the past two years from its mid-2022 peak above 7 percent. Progress on inflation has been broad based. Estimates based on the consumer price index and other data released this week indicate that total PCE prices rose 2.3 percent over the 12 months ending in October and that, excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core PCE prices rose 2.8 percent. Core measures of goods and services inflation, excluding housing, fell rapidly over the past two years and have returned to rates closer to those consistent with our goals. We expect that these rates will continue to fluctuate in their recent ranges. We are watching carefully to be sure that they do, however, just as we are closely tracking the gradual decline in housing services inflation, which has yet to fully normalize. Inflation is running much closer to our 2 percent longer-run goal, but it is not there yet. We are committed to finishing the job. With labor market conditions in rough balance and inflation expectations well anchored, I expect inflation to continue to come down toward our 2 percent objective, albeit on a sometimes-bumpy path.

Monetary Policy

Given progress toward our inflation goal and the cooling of labor market conditions, last week my Federal Open Market Committee colleagues and I took another step in reducing the degree of policy restraint by lowering our policy interest rate 1/4 percentage point.

We are confident that with an appropriate recalibration of our policy stance, strength in the economy and the labor market can be maintained, with inflation moving sustainably down to 2 percent. We see the risks to achieving our employment and inflation goals as being roughly in balance, and we are attentive to the risks to both sides. We know that reducing policy restraint too quickly could hinder progress on inflation. At the same time, reducing policy restraint too slowly could unduly weaken economic activity and employment.

We are moving policy over time to a more neutral setting. But the path for getting there is not preset. In considering additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, we will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks. The economy is not sending any signals that we need to be in a hurry to lower rates. The strength we are currently seeing in the economy gives us the ability to approach our decisions carefully. Ultimately, the path of the policy rate will depend on how the incoming data and the economic outlook evolve.

We remain resolute in our commitment to the dual mandate given to us by Congress: maximum employment and price stability. Our aim has been to return inflation to our objective without the kind of painful rise in unemployment that has often accompanied past efforts to bring down high inflation. That would be a highly desirable result for the communities, families, and businesses we serve. While the task is not complete, we have made a good deal of progress toward that outcome.

Thank you, and I look forward to our discussion.

Tyler Durden Thu, 11/14/2024 - 14:45

Insurance Mogul Greg Lindberg Pleads Guilty To $2 Billion Fraud, Money Laundering Scheme

Zero Hedge -

Insurance Mogul Greg Lindberg Pleads Guilty To $2 Billion Fraud, Money Laundering Scheme

Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Insurance mogul Greg Lindberg has pleaded guilty to conspiracy in a $2 billion fraud and money laundering scheme that defrauded thousands of insurance policyholders, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The Department of Justice building in Washington on March 28, 2023. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times

Lindberg pleaded guilty on Nov. 12 to one count of conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States and one count of money laundering in a scheme to defraud insurance regulators and policyholders.

The 54-year-old Tampa resident faces a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison for the two counts, the DOJ said in a Nov. 12 statement. Lindberg is the founder of Eli Global LLC and owner of Global Bankers Insurance Group.

Prosecutors said that Lindberg conspired to defraud various insurance companies and policyholders through a web of companies based in North Carolina, Bermuda, Malta, and elsewhere between 2016 and 2019.

According to his indictment, Lindberg allegedly deceived the North Carolina Department of Insurance and other regulators and evaded regulatory requirements designed to protect insurance policyholders.

The insurance magnate was accused of using insurance company funds for his personal benefit by purchasing real estate and “forgiving” more than $125 million in loans from his affiliated companies to himself.

It stated that Lindberg and his co-conspirators engaged in “circular transactions” among his affiliated companies to invest more than $2 billion in loans and other securities and then laundered the scheme’s proceeds.

Prosecutors alleged that Lindberg provided false statements about his insurance business to regulators and obscured the real financial health of his companies. The scheme has led to some of his insurance companies being put into rehabilitation and liquidation, it stated.

“Thousands of policyholders suffered substantial financial hardship as a result of Lindberg’s fraud scheme, which left multiple companies in or on the brink of liquidation,” DOJ Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole Argentieri said in a statement.

The Justice Department will not hesitate to hold corporate executives accountable when they threaten critical sectors of the economy, like the insurance industry, to enrich themselves.

The Epoch Times reached out to Lindberg’s attorney but did not hear back by publication time.

In May, a federal judge convicted Lindberg and his consultant, John Gray, of conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud and bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds. They face a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison for the charges. A sentencing date has not been set.

Lindberg and Gray were accused of trying to offer $1.5 million to North Carolina Insurance Commissioner Mike Causey in campaign contributions in exchange for the removal of the North Carolina Department of Insurance’s senior deputy commissioner, who was responsible for overseeing the regulation of Lindberg’s company.

Tyler Durden Thu, 11/14/2024 - 14:25

Trump Team To Nuke EV Tax Credit As Musk's Price-War Endgame Looms

Zero Hedge -

Trump Team To Nuke EV Tax Credit As Musk's Price-War Endgame Looms

The final chapter of the electric vehicle price war, sparked by Tesla's Elon Musk, hinges on President-elect Donald Trump's plan to eliminate the $7,500 consumer tax credit. Sources with direct knowledge told Reuters that the Trump team has discussed ending the EV tax credit as part of broader tax reform legislation.

Sources indicated that Tesla - the largest EV automaker in the US and the only one not reliant on EV credits for survival - told the Trump transition committee that it fully supports the federal government ending the subsidy.

Here's more from Reuters:

Repealing the subsidy, which has been a signature measure of President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), is being discussed in meetings by an energy-policy transition team led by billionaire oilman Harold Hamm, founder of Continental Resources, and North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, the two sources said.

The group has had several meetings since Trump's Nov. 5 election victory, including some at his Florida Mar-a-Lago club, where Tesla chief executive Elon Musk has also spent considerable time since the election.

In mid-July, Trump stated at a campaign rally that he would "end the Electric Vehicle Mandate on Day One — thereby saving the US auto industry from complete obliteration, and saving US customers thousands of dollars per car." 

On X, around that time, Musk explained to the Whole Mars Catalog why repealing the tax credit would only benefit Tesla: 

In October, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing all automotive brands besides Tesla, penned a letter expressing to lawmakers in Congress how crucial the EV tax credit is in "cementing the US as a global leader in the future of automotive technology and manufacturing." 

In the markets, Rivian shares tumbled by 10% in the early afternoon, while Tesla shares fell by 3.5%.

We knew the playbook in July. Here it is again: "Musk's strategy to win the EV price war: Build the largest EV business with taxpayer dollars, popularize EVs, allow other startups and OEMs to enter the market, and then support politicians who want to end EV subsidies, crushing the competition and leaving Tesla reigning supreme." 

Tyler Durden Thu, 11/14/2024 - 13:20

Israel Said Seeking Lebanon Ceasefire By January As 'Gift' To Trump

Zero Hedge -

Israel Said Seeking Lebanon Ceasefire By January As 'Gift' To Trump

It is no secret that Israeli leaders are overjoyed both at Donald Trump winning the US Presidency, and especially many of his very pro-Israel picks for foreign policy related positions in his administration. On Wednesday night The Washington Post issued an usual headline which says Israel is seeking to forge a Lebanon ceasefire plan as a "gift" the Trump.

"There is an understanding that Israel would gift something to Trump… that in January there will be an understanding about Lebanon," an unnamed Israeli official told the Post.

"A close aide to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Donald Trump and Jared Kushner this week that Israel is rushing to advance a cease-fire deal in Lebanon, according to three current and former Israeli officials briefed on the meeting, with the aim of delivering an early foreign policy win to the president-elect," the report details.

Via Reuters

US special envoy for Lebanon Amos Hochstein has this week said "there is a shot" of securing a ceasefire deal in Lebanon soon. Axios wrote that "It would be a major achievement for Biden in his final months in office."

But clearly the Israelis are making it be known that they would rather deal with Trump in matters of war and peace in the region. Thus it's expected that the war raging in south Lebanon will at least go on into January.

Like with Ukraine, Trump is pledging to quickly bring to an end wars which have Washington involvement; however, in a phone call last month he told PM Netanyahu to “do what you have to do” against Hezbollah and Hamas.

One career US diplomat in the Middle East region was cited in WaPo as saying "Netanyahu has no loyalty to Biden and will be focused entirely on currying favor with Trump."

Starting days ago Israel began making contacts with the Trump transition team. On Sunday Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer met with Trump at Mar-a-Lago resort. Dermer and Trump reportedly discussed Israel's plans for Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran over the course of the coming months. The Israelis notified the White House about the meeting in Florida.

A US-backed ceasefire plan currently being discussed would heavily rely on UN peacekeeping forces and Lebanese army soldiers deploying near the Israeli border to ensure Hezbollah doesn't move back in once the Israeli army departs.

"The ceasefire proposal begins with a 60-day implementation period, during which time the Lebanese army will deploy along the border and confiscate Hezbollah arms in southern Lebanon," Times of Israel described in late October.

"The IDF will be required to pull all troops from Lebanon within seven days of the end of hostilities, and will be replaced by the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF)," the report added. UN peacekeeping troops will reportedly facilitate the transition, and some 10,000 Lebanese national army troops. This plan is being negotiated by Biden administration officials, but time is running out.

In the meantime Israel's airstrikes on positions in the south, Beirut, and even in the northeast have continued. They've even expanded, with the Bekaa Valley getting pounded and other parts of easter Lebanon getting hit. Israel has also kept up its ground offensive, and both sides have sustained losses.

Tyler Durden Thu, 11/14/2024 - 13:00

Europe Will Draw The Short Straw In The Next Trade War

Zero Hedge -

Europe Will Draw The Short Straw In The Next Trade War

By Elwin de Groot, head of macro strategy

The Short Straw?

That Europe will probably draw the short straw in a scenario of rising protectionism and potential trade tensions with the US has been a key theme in markets since Trump’s smashing victory. Overnight, the Associated Press has called a House majority for the Republicans, which only further supports the view that this will give the incoming Trump team the confidence to make swift and broad-ranging policy changes from day one. So swift that it could overwhelm its European partners, especially since they are distracted at home.

Since mid-September, when Trump’s star started to climb in earnest, the interest rate differential between the US and Europe has widened considerably and the euro-dollar has lost some 6% of its value (offsetting the impact of a 6% US import tariff on European goods, by the way).

What seems fairly obvious is that the US will use tariffs (and maybe other policies) to attract more business to the US and will pressure allies to redirect supply chains from China. Although many businesses, sectors or states may wish not to take sides, the US’s ability to apply statecraft pressure makes this unrealistic. Compared to Europe, China is more likely to retaliate in a tit-for-that fashion (as it has already reduced its price-sensitive imports from the US, replacing them with imports from, for example, Brazil).

China could –if really pressed– also unleash domestic demand stimulus, as it is not bound by a “Growth and Stability Pact” straightjacket.

Europe’s position, on the other hand, is much more fragile.

If the US opts to raise significant additional tariffs on Chinese goods, European exporters may partly benefit from substitution (assuming that US producers cannot make up for the entire gap between demand and imports from China that arises). But a universal tariff could be a serious headache for Europe as tit-for-tat is much more complicated. First and foremost because Europe would shoot itself in the foot (think of LNG imports from the US). At best Europe will be able retaliate partially, selectively and with some delay. It may also hope to enter negotiations that will lead to reduced tariffs or avoiding them altogether (think of large purchases of LNG, defence goods, etc.). Given that Trump has a knack for making deals this is not a completely unrealistic scenario either.

But is Europe truly in a position to negotiate? French president Macron is a lame duck with a coalition that depends on support from the extreme right, and Germany is facing elections in February. This could be fertile soil for a negative feedback loop. It could accelerate decisions in board rooms to either cut back on staff (following large-scale labor hoarding) or accelerate plans to move (uncompetitive) production out of the Eurozone. Bundesbank President Nagel yesterday warned that the implementation of Trump’s tariff plans could cost Germany 1% of economic output, suggesting that German growth could even slip into negative territory next year.

Germany’s export-driven model is ill-equipped to deal with rising protectionism. This week, the German IG Metall union reached a 25-month deal with employers in the electrotechnical sector. A one-time €600 payment, a 2% pay rise from April 2025 onwards, and another 3.1% from April 2026 plus increases in sector performance surcharges are – according to our estimates – worth some 5.5 to 6%. This is a smaller increase than in the previous 2-year wage deal, but it is still more consistent with a gradual slowdown in wage growth rather than a fast one. And whilst it provides clarity and stability and may support a consumer recovery (since it is above the projected inflation rate) it will not take away any concerns about competitiveness.

The pessimism isn’t hard to grasp, but it is perhaps also the kind of sentiment that is necessary to get things moving. For one, the German elections open up the possibility for a renewed freeze or reform of the constitutional debt brake. Yesterday, Chancellor Scholz pleaded for additional measures to boost the economy. The government’s advisors, who slashed their growth forecast for 2025 to 0.4% from 1.1% previously, are also urging the government to durably increase public spending in infrastructure, defense and education. But even the CDU’s Merz, who may well be the future Chancellor, told Süddeutsche Zeitung that he is open to a reform of the strict borrowing rules, as long as additional debt is used to finance investment and not consumption or social spending. It’s just an opening shot, but it does suggest there is some sense of urgency even among some of the staunchest budget hawks.

Ultimately, European joint debt issuance and/or a freezing of the freshly-revamped EU budget rules may be required to unlock the required funds to finance Europe’s ambition to regain strategic autonomy. However, this looks politically unfeasible in the near term. Therefore, the EU has already started to look at other resources. The FT reported Tuesday that cohesion funds may be used to fund investments in military infrastructure and defence industries under certain conditions. These cohesion funds amount to 30% of the EU budget, or €392 billion. However, so far, only some 5% of the budget for the period 2021-2027 has been spent, suggesting that Member States have struggled to find good purposes for these funds. So, this is potentially a significant funding source for one of the key pillars of the strategic agenda.

It’s easy to succumb to pessimism over Europe, and we certainly agree that some very challenging years lie ahead. But this time, Europe is not completely unprepared. The Commission has a host of tools that allows them to respond to trade tensions relatively quickly. And the Draghi and Letta reports offer a host of concrete ideas to act purposefully. In the past few days we have perhaps seen a first glimpse of the age-old adage that Europe needs a crisis to grow stronger.

Briefly returning to the US, inflation for October was fully in line with expectations. The headline inflation rate rebounded to 2.6% y/y from 2.4% in September, albeit largely due to base effects. Core inflation remains sticky at 3.3% with a slightly elevated month-on-month rate of 0.3% for several months. Services less rent of shelter rebounded to 4.5% from 4.4%; it slowed down a little in month-on-month terms but remains elevated at 0.4%. This mixed picture served both hawks and doves. Minneapolis Fed’s Kashkari took the data as “headed in the right direction” and consistent with the “easing path” that the Fed is on, whilst Dallas Fed’s Logan called for caution in the cutting pace. The market took the CPI report as a sign that a December cut is very much in play, with the likelihood rising to 68% from less than 50% the other day. The relatively strong market reaction to the “in-line” figures indicates that markets have been dominated by Trump news flow: a figure just north of consensus would have forced the Fed to weigh future risks to inflation – stemming from tariffs and tax cuts – in its near-term deliberations).

Tyler Durden Thu, 11/14/2024 - 12:40

Part 1: Current State of the Housing Market; Overview for mid-November 2024

Calculated Risk -

Today, in the Calculated Risk Real Estate Newsletter: Part 1: Current State of the Housing Market; Overview for mid-November 2024

A brief excerpt:
This 2-part overview for mid-October provides a snapshot of the current housing market.

I always focus first on inventory, since inventory usually tells the tale! I’m watching months-of-supply closely.
...
New home inventory, as a percentage of total inventory, is still very high. The following graph uses Not Seasonally Adjusted (NSA) existing home inventory from the National Association of Realtors® (NAR) and new home inventory from the Census Bureau (only completed and under construction inventory).

New ListingsIt took a number of years following the housing bust for new home inventory to return to the pre-bubble percent of total inventory. Then, with the pandemic, existing home inventory collapsed and now the percent of new homes is 20.8% of the total for sale inventory, down from a peak of 27.2% in December 2022.

The percent of new homes of total inventory should continue to decline as existing home inventory increases. However, the percent of new home inventory will increase seasonally over the Winter as existing homes are withdrawn from the market.
There is much more in the article.

WTI Dips After Crude Inventories Build To Highest In 3 Months

Zero Hedge -

WTI Dips After Crude Inventories Build To Highest In 3 Months

Oil price are trading higher this morning after treading water for two days (lower than pre-election) following API's report of a (unexpected) small crude inventory draw and despite a strong dollar.

However, the IEA on Thursday warned that the oil market faces a surplus of more than 1 million barrels a day next year, which could swell further if OPEC+ decides to press ahead with supply hikes.

"World oil supply is rising at a healthy clip. Following the early November US elections, we continue to expect the United States to lead non-OPEC+ supply growth of 1.5 mb/d in both 2024 and 2025, along with higher output from Canada, Guyana and Argentina," the report noted.

" ... Total growth from the five American producers will more than cover expected demand growth in 2024 and 2025 ... Our current balances suggest that even if the OPEC+ cuts remain in place, global supply exceeds demand by more than 1 mb/d next year."

In its Short-Term Energy Outlook released Wednesday the Energy Information Administration also predicted supply will exceed demand beginning in the second quarter of next year.

API

  • Crude -800k

  • Cushing -1.9mm

  • Gasoline +300k

  • Distillates  +1.1mm

DOE

  • Crude +2.09mm

  • Cushing -688k

  • Gasoline -4.41mm

  • Distillates -1.39mm

US Crude stocks unexpectedly rose last week according to the official DOE data (as opposed to the small draw reported by API). Product inventories tumbled though (as did stocks at the Cushing hub)...

Source: Bloomberg

Total US crude stocks are back at their highest since early August...

Source: Bloomberg

The Biden admin added 567k barrels to the SPR last week...

Source: Bloomberg

US Crude production dipped from record highs...

Source: Bloomberg

WTI was trading around $69 ahead of the official print.

“The coming weeks will be critical in shaping the near-term outlook for the oil market,” said Ole Hvalbye, an analyst at SEB AB. “The continued strength of the US dollar is exerting downward pressure on commodities overall, while ongoing concerns about demand growth are weighing on the outlook for crude.”

Tyler Durden Thu, 11/14/2024 - 11:08

Advance Auto Cuts Outlook, Prepares 700-Store Closure 

Zero Hedge -

Advance Auto Cuts Outlook, Prepares 700-Store Closure 

Advance Auto Parts reported a third-quarter loss, slashed its full-year outlook, and announced plans to close stores and distribution centers by summer 2025. The top automotive aftermarket parts provider for professionals and do-it-yourself consumers was pressured by soft demand for vehicle parts, as elevated inflation and broader economic pressures left fewer consumers repairing their vehicles. 

For the third quarter ending October 5, Advance Auto reported a narrowed quarterly loss of $6 million, or 10 cents per share, compared to $62 million, or $1.04 per share, in the same quarter one year ago. Analysts tracked by FactSet had forecast a profit of 49 cents per share for the quarter, making the loss a notable surprise.

Sales fell 3% to $2.15 billion, missing the FactSet consensus of $2.62 billion. Comparable sales slid 2.3%, while higher labor costs dented margins, but only partially offset by a reduction in marketing expenses. 

For the balance of 2024, Advance Auto provided investors with a downshift in guidance and now sees comparable sales -1%, versus the previous guidance of -1% to 0%. 

Advance Auto's board approved a restructuring plan to reduce its US footprint by 700 stores and four distribution centers by mid-2025. Plans to slash jobs were also in place, yet official figures were not given. Th company has about 5,000 stores nationwide.

"We are pleased to have made progress on our strategic actions, including the completion of the sale of Worldpac and a comprehensive operational productivity review of our business," Shane O'Kelly, president and chief executive officer, wrote in a statement. 

O'Kelly noted, "We are charting a clear path forward and introducing a new three-year financial plan, with a focus on executing core retail fundamentals to improve the productivity of all our assets and to create shareholder value."

Shares in New York were marginally lower in premarket trading. The company has lost 33% of its market value year-to-date (as of Wednesday's close). Three years of steep annual losses. 

Shares are trading at 15-year lows. 

Goldman's Kate McShane remains "Neutral" on Advanced Auto with a 12-month price target of $60. 

Meanwhile, inflationary headwinds and increasing competition from Chinese automakers have crushed the Western auto industry

Part suppliers such as BorgWarner and Aptiv have recently slashed annual sales forecasts due to lower vehicle production and consumers dialing back on spending. 

The takeaway appears to be consumers are opting out of repairing their cars. This comes as subprime consumers hit a proverbial brick wall. 

Tyler Durden Thu, 11/14/2024 - 10:45

Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims Decrease to 217,000

Calculated Risk -

The DOL reported:
In the week ending November 9, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 217,000, a decrease of 4,000 from the previous week's unrevised level of 221,000. The 4-week moving average was 221,000, a decrease of 6,250 from the previous week's unrevised average of 227,250.
emphasis added
The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since 1971.

Click on graph for larger image.

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased to 221,000.

The previous week was unrevised.

Weekly claims were below the consensus forecast.

Peter Schiff: Printing Money Is Not the Cure for Cononavirus

Financial Armageddon -


Peter Schiff: Printing Money Is Not the Cure for Cononavirus



In his most recent podcast, Peter Schiff talked about coronavirus and the impact that it is having on the markets. Earlier this month, Peter said he thought the virus was just an excuse for stock market woes. At the time he believed the market was poised to fall anyway. But as it turns out, coronavirus has actually helped the US stock market because it has led central banks to pump even more liquidity into the world financial system. All this means more liquidity — central banks easing. In fact, that is exactly what has already happened, except the new easing is taking place, for now, outside the United States, particularly in China.” Although the new money is primarily being created in China, it is flowing into dollars — the dollar index is up — and into US stocks. Last week, US stock markets once again made all-time record highs. In fact, I think but for the coronavirus, the US stock market would still be selling off. But because of the central bank stimulus that has been the result of fears over the coronavirus, that actually benefitted not only the US dollar, but the US stock market.” In the midst of all this, Peter raises a really good question. The primary economic concern is that coronavirus will slow down output and ultimately stunt economic growth. Practically speaking, the world would produce less stuff. If the virus continues to spread, there would be fewer goods and services produced in a market that is hunkered down. Why would the Federal Reserve respond, or why would any central bank respond to that by printing money? How does printing more money solve that problem? It doesn’t. In fact, it actually exacerbates it. But you know, everybody looks at central bankers as if they’ve got the solution to every problem. They don’t. They don’t have the magic wand. They just have a printing press. And all that creates is inflation.” Sometimes the illusion inflation creates can look like a magic wand. Printing money can paper over problems. But none of this is going to fundamentally fix the economy. In fact, if central bankers were really going to do the right thing, the appropriate response would be to drain liquidity from the markets, not supply even more.” Peter explained how the Fed was originally intended to create an “elastic” money supply that would expand or contract along with economic output. Today, the money supply only goes in one direction — that’s up. The economy is strong, print money. The economy is weak, print even more money.” Of course, the asset that’s doing the best right now is gold. The yellow metal pushed above $1,600 yesterday. Gold is up 5.5% on the year in dollar terms and has set record highs in other currencies. Because gold is rising even in an environment where the dollar is strengthening against other fiat currencies, that shows you that there is an underlying weakness in the dollar that is right now not being reflected in the Forex markets, but is being reflected in the gold markets. Because after all, why are people buying gold more aggressively than they’re buying dollars or more aggressively than they’re buying US Treasuries? Because they know that things are not as good for the dollar or the US economy as everybody likes to believe. So, more people are seeking out refuge in a better safe-haven and that is gold.” Peter also talked about the debate between Trump and Obama over who gets credit for the booming economy – which of course, is not booming.






Dump the Dollar before Bank Runs start in America -- Economic Collapse 2020

Financial Armageddon -












We are living in crazy times. I have a hard time believing that most of the general public is not awake, but in reality, they are. We've never seen anything like this; I mean not even under Obama during the worst part of the Great Recession." Now the Fed is desperately trying to keep interest rates from rising. The problem is that it's a much bigger debt bubble this time around , and the Fed is going to have to blow a lot more air into it to keep it inflated. The difference is this time it's not going to work." It looks like the Fed did another $104.15 billion of Not Q.E. in a single day. The Fed claims it's only temporary. But that is precisely what Bernanke claimed when the Fed started QE1. Milton Freedman once said, "Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program." The same applies to Q.E., or whatever the Fed wants to pretend it's doing. Except this is not QE4, according to Powell. Right. Pumping so much money out, and they are accusing China of currency manipulation ? Wow! Seriously! Amazing! Dump the U.S. dollar while you still have a chance. Welcome to The Atlantis Report. And it is even worse than that, In addition to the $104.15 billion of "Not Q.E." this past Thursday; the FED added another $56.65 billion in liquidity to financial markets the next day on Friday. That's $160.8 billion in two days!!!! in just 48 hours. That is more than 2 TIMES the highest amount the FED has ever injected on a monthly basis under a Q.E. program (which was $80 billion per month) Since this isn't QE....it will be really scary on what they are going to call Q.E. Will it twice, three times, four times, five times what this injection per month ! It is going to be explosive since it takes about 60 to 90 days for prices to react to this, January should see significant inflation as prices soak up the excess liquidity. The question is, where will the inflation occur first . The spike in the repo rate might have a technical explanation: a misjudgment was made in the Fed's money market operations. Even so, two conclusions can be drawn: managing the money markets is becoming harder, and from now on, banks will be studying each other's creditworthiness to a greater degree than before. Those people, who struggle with the minutiae of money markets, and that includes most professionals, should focus on the causes and not the symptoms. Financial markets have recovered from each downturn since 1980 because interest rates have been cut to new lows. Post-2008, they were cut to near zero or below zero in all major economies. In response to a new financial crisis, they cannot go any lower. Central banks will look for new ways to replicate or broaden Q.E. (At some point, governments will simply see repression as an easier option). Then there is the problem of 'risk-free' assets becoming risky assets. Financial markets assume that the probability of major governments such as the U.S. or U.K. defaulting is zero. These governments are entering the next downturn with debt roughly twice the levels proportionate to GDP that was seen in 2008. The belief that the policy worked was completely predicated on the fact that it was temporary and that it was reversible, that the Fed was going to be able to normalize interest rates and shrink its balance sheet back down to pre-crisis levels. Well, when the balance sheet is five-trillion, six-trillion, seven-trillion when we're back at zero, when we're back in a recession, nobody is going to believe it is temporary. Nobody is going to believe that the Fed has this under control, that they can reverse this policy. And the dollar is going to crash. And when the dollar crashes, it's going to take the bond market with it, and we're going to have stagflation. We're going to have a deep recession with rising interest rates, and this whole thing is going to come imploding down. everything is temporary with the fed including remaining off the gold standard temporary in the Fed's eyes could mean at least 50 years This liquidity problem is a signal that trading desks are loaded up on inventory and can't get rid of it. Repo is done out of a need for cash. If you own all of your securities (i.e., a long-only, no leverage mutual fund) you have no need to "repo" your securities - you're earning interest every night so why would you want to 'repo' your securities where you are paying interest for that overnight loan (securities lending is another animal). So, it is those that 'lever-up' and need the cash for settlement purposes on securities they've bought with borrowed money that needs to utilize the repo desk. With this in mind, as we continue to see this need to obtain cash (again, needed to settle other securities purchases), it shows these firms don't have the capital to add more inventory to, what appears to be, a bloated inventory. Now comes the fun part: the Treasury is about to auction 3's, 10's, and 30-year bonds. If I am correct (again, I could be wrong), the Fed realizes securities firms don't have the shelf space to take down a good portion of these auctions. If there isn't enough retail/institutional demand, it will lead to not only a crappy sale but major concerns to the street that there is now no backstop, at all, to any sell-off. At which point, everyone will want to be the first one through the door and sell immediately, but to whom? If there isn't enough liquidity in the repo market to finance their positions, the firms would be unable to increase their inventory. We all saw repo shut down on the 2008 crisis. Wall St runs on money. . OVERNIGHT money. They lever up to inventory securities for trading. If they can't get overnight money, they can't purchase securities. And if they can't unload what they have, it means the buy-side isn't taking on more either. Accounts settle overnight. This includes things like payrolls and bill pay settlements. If a bank doesn't have enough cash to payout what its customers need to pay out, it borrows. At least one and probably more than one banks are insolvent. That's what's going on. First, it can't be one or two banks that are short. They'd simply call around until they found someone to lend. But they did that, and even at markedly elevated rates, still, NO ONE would lend them the money. That tells me that it's not a problem of a couple of borrowers, it's a problem of no lenders. And that means that there's no bank in the world left with any real liquidity. They are ALL maxed out. But as bad as that is, and that alone could be catastrophic, what it really signals is even worse. The lending rates are just the flip side of the coin of the value of the assets lent against. If the rates go up, the value goes down. And with rates spiking to 10%, how far does the value fall? Enormously! And if banks had to actually mark down the value of the assets to reflect 10% interest rates, then my god, every bank in the world is insolvent overnight. Everyone's capital ratios are in the toilet, and they'd have to liquidate. We're talking about the simultaneous insolvency of every bank on the planet. Bank runs. No money in ATMs, Branches closed. Safe deposit boxes confiscated. The whole nine yards, It's actually here. The scenario has tended to guide toward for years and years is actually happening RIGHT NOW! And people are still trying to say it's under control. Every bank in the world is currently insolvent. The only thing keeping it going is printing billions of dollars every day. Financial Armageddon isn't some far off future risk. It's here. Prepare accordingly. This fiat system has reached the end of the line, and it's not correct that fiat currencies fail by design. The problem is corruption and manipulation. It is corruption and cheating that erodes trust and faith until the entire system becomes a gigantic fraud. Banks and governments everywhere ARE the problem and simply have to be removed. They have lost all trust and respect, and all they have left is war and mayhem. As long as we continue to have a majority of braindead asleep imbeciles following orders from these psychopaths, nothing will change. Fiat currency is not just thievery. Fiat currency is SLAVERY. Ultimately the most harmful effect of using debt of undefined value as money (i.e., fiat currencies) is the de facto legalization of a caste system based on voluntary slavery. The bankers have a charter, or the legal *right*, to create money out of nothing. You, you don't. Therefore you and the bankers do not have the same standing before the law. The law of the land says that you will go to jail if you do the same thing (creating money out of thin air) that the banker does in full legality. You and the banker are not equal before the law. ALL the countries of the world; Islamic or secular, Jewish or Arab, democracy or dictatorship; all of them place the bankers ABOVE you. And all of you accept that only whining about fiat money going down in exchange value over time (price inflation which is not the same as monetary inflation). Actually, price inflation itself is mainly due to the greed and stupidity of the bankers who could keep fiat money's exchange value reasonably stable, only if they wanted to. Witness the crash of silver and gold prices which the bankers of the world; Russian, American, Chinese, Jewish, Indian, Arab, all of them collaborated to engineer through the suppression and stagnation of precious metals' prices to levels around the metals' production costs, or what it costs to dig gold and silver out of the ground. The bankers of the world could also collaborate to keep nominal prices steady (as they do in the case of the suppression of precious metals prices). After all, the ability to create fiat money and force its usage is a far more excellent source of power and wealth than that which is afforded simply by stealing it through inflation. The bankers' greed and stupidity blind them to this fact. They want it all, and they want it now. In conclusion, The bankers can create money out of nothing and buy your goods and services with this worthless fiat money, effectively for free. You, you can't. You, you have to lead miserable existences for the most of you and WORK in order to obtain that effectively nonexistent, worthless credit money (whose purchasing/exchange value is not even DEFINED thus rendering all contracts based on the null and void!) that the banker effortlessly creates out of thin air with a few strokes of the computer keyboard, and which he doesn't even bother to print on paper anymore, electing to keep it in its pure quantum uncertain form instead, as electrons whizzing about inside computer chips which will become mute and turn silent refusing to tell you how many fiat dollars or euros there are in which account, in the absence of electricity. No electricity, no fiat, nor crypto money. It would appear that trust is deteriorating as it did when Lehman blew up . Something really big happened that set off this chain reaction in the repo markets. Whatever that something is, we aren't be informed. They're trying to cover it up, paper it over with conjured cash injections, play it cool in front of the cameras while sweating profusely under the 5 thousands dollar suits. I'm guessing that the final high-speed plunge into global economic collapse has begun. All we see here is the ripples and whitewater churning the surface, but beneath the surface, there is an enormous beast thrashing desperately in its death throws. Now is probably the time to start tying up loose ends with the long-running prep projects, just saying. In other words, prepare accordingly, and Get your money out of the banks. I don't care if you don't believe me about Bitcoin. Get your money out of the banks. Don't keep any more money in a bank than you need to pay your bills and can afford to lose.











The Financial Armageddon Economic Collapse Blog tracks trends and forecasts , futurists , visionaries , free investigative journalists , researchers , Whistelblowers , truthers and many more













The Financial Armageddon Economic Collapse Blog tracks trends and forecasts , futurists , visionaries , free investigative journalists , researchers , Whistelblowers , truthers and many more

Hillary Clinton's Top Secret Files Revealed Here

Financial Armageddon -

The FBI released a summary of its file from the Hillary Clinton email investigation on Friday, showing details of Clinton's explanation of her use of a private email server to handle classified communications. The release comes nearly two months after FBI Director James Comey announced that although Clinton's handling of classified information was "extremely careless," it did not rise to the level of a prosecutable offense. Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced the next day that she would not pursue charges in the matter. "We are making these materials available to the public in the interest of transparency and in response to numerous Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests," the FBI noted in a statement sent to reporters with links to the documents. The documents include notes from Clinton's July 2 interview with agents, as well as a "factual summary of the FBI's investigation into this matter," according to the FBI release. Throughout her interview with agents, Clinton repeatedly said she relied on the career professionals she worked with to handle classified information correctly. The agents asked about a series of specific emails, and in each case Clinton said she wasn't worried about the particular material being discussed on a nonclassified channel.





Pages