Individual Economists

10 Weekend Reads

The Big Picture -

The weekend is here! Pour yourself a mug of Danish Blend coffee, grab a seat outside, and get ready for our longer-form weekend reads:

​• Red and Blue America Have Found Something to Agree on: Flock Cameras Must Go: Liberal Asheville and conservative Oconee County both voted to drop the AI license-plate readers — more than 100 local governments have paused or ended contracts this year. A national backlash against AI-enabled license-plate readers is uniting Trump country and progressive strongholds alike. ‘Nobody wants to be surveilled…doesn’t matter what your political leaning is.’ (Wall Street Journal)

​• Was Silicon Valley Always Like This?: Nitish Pahwa revisits Paulina Borsook’s Cyberselfish and the forgotten voices who warned of impending trouble amid the 1990s internet optimism. As A.I. doomerism takes off, I tracked down the author of Cyberselfish to chat through her decades-old critiques of tech bros. (Slatesee also A brief history of AI executives calling for regulation: The industry is in a panic, but it’s been claiming to want legal guardrails for years — with few meaningful results. (The Verge)

The day Warren Buffett saved Salomon Brothers ‘Our name was rat poison’  When Buffett arrived at Salomon that morning he faced three sets of overlapping and intertwining problems: Find out the true nature and cause of the crises; convince regulators to let Salomon keep doing business; and figure out who would run the bank, after its CEO, president, and vice-chair had all resigned in the last 48 hours. Richard Dewey on Sunday, August 18, 1991 — Buffett with a firm to rescue. (Financial Times)

The surprising new way to find friends and true love? Your Costco card: USA Today on the warehouse club as community and dating scene. (USA Today)

There Are Over 1 Million N.Y.C. Street Signs. Here’s How They Are Made:. From Cornelia Street to the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, the 46 workers in this Queens building bring to life the words and symbols that guide the city. (New York Times)

Rules of relevance: we explore how such “learned blindness” can become a major source of market risk in periods of rapid technological and geopolitical change. It may not be changes in the data that trigger market volatility ahead, but a change in the lens through which investors interpret that data. (Carlyle) PDF

“There is no such thing as a ‘sense of humor’ in the Criminal Code”: Russian stand-up comedians on surviving war and censorship: Russian stand-up comedy has changed dramatically over the past four and a half years of full-scale war. In early 2026, a Russian court sentenced comedian Artemy Ostanin to five years and nine months in prison for a joke about a legless Jesus. Within the stand-up community, the case was seen as a warning: anything said onstage can lead to very real trouble. Venues now ask performers in advance to keep their shows “apolitical,” while comedians themselves remove potentially risky material from acts or hide it behind hints and innuendo. Some comedians left Russia during the mobilization but later returned after finding that they could not afford to remain in exile. The Insider spoke to stand-up comedians who live and perform in Russia. They described what can be joked about today, how fear and self-censorship have changed the scene, and why even audiences are no longer always interested in political humor.. (The Insider)

​• The Quaalude Comeback: A Once ‘Extinct’ Drug From the 70s Makes a Resurgence: Mattha Busby on the return of “ludes” — whose 1984 elimination was the one unequivocal success of the war on drugs. (The Guardian)

​• The Most Crucial Step to Better Sleep Is Also the Most Straightforward: Smart mattresses and sleep trackers aside, experts say that the key to feeling well-rested is to simply stick to your bedtime. Michele Ross on the metric the mattress upgrades and sleep scores overlook — when you actually go to bed and wake up. (GQ)

​• Impossibility Is a Myth: The Fence goes long on the proposition. Sacha Jafri sold an artwork for $62 million dollars in 2021 at an auction. But the money never changed hands. What happened? (The Fence)

Video of the day: The Apple Ad That Broke Microsoft

Be sure to check out our Masters in Business this weekend with Glen Kacher, founder and CIO of Light Street Capital. He launched the firm in Palo Alto after stints working with Julian Roberts at Tiger and Roger McNamee at Integral. His Mercury funds returned 45.7% in 2023, 59.4% in 2024, and 37.3% in 2025 — the best three-year stretch of any of the “Tiger Cubs.” He describes the firm as “the Silicon Valley Home Team, 100% focused on tech opportunities.”

 

Joining the dots between big AI

Source: Financial Times

 

Sign up for our reads-only mailing list here.

~~~

To learn how these reads are assembled each day, please see this.

 

The post 10 Weekend Reads appeared first on The Big Picture.

The Pathocracy Of Women In The Democratic Party

Zero Hedge -

The Pathocracy Of Women In The Democratic Party

Authored by James Howard Kunstler via Clusterfuck Nation,

"The female mind - especially in matters of political significance - struggles with understanding authority and rule enforcement."

- JD Haltigan on X

You know the midterm election is a struggle session testing whether our country wants to be sane or insane. Of course, this raises the question: what's so great about being insane? If nothing else, it implies a lot of bad decision-making, leading to all manner of sorrow and woe in life.

So, why would so many opt to be crazy?

The Ordeal of Father Isaac Jogue among the Iroquois

The answer is probably that they were snookered into it, fooled, tricked, rooked, spoofed, flimflammed, bamboozled, enticed into a range of thought and emotion counter to their self-interest and well-being. Isn't this exactly what you see in the social phenomenon of "transing" pubescent children? To induce them to go along with a malevolent program for turning them into something they are not.

A whole apparatus was constructed to carry out "gender-affirming care." Notice how positive the language is. It's "care," administered by adults, not a few of them physicians and clinical psychologists, who affect to care. And it "affirms," that is, it validates, it turns supposition into fact (that is not so). The adults happen to be in authority over children. They are presumed to be trustworthy.

But they are not trustworthy. They persuade children confused by puberty to be mutilated with surgery and hormones in order to put on a performance for the adults. The performance is called "No Boundaries." It does not really affirm a child's gender by pretending to change it. It affirms the mental illness of the untrustworthy adults. They have developed a defect of cognition that disrupts their perception of reality. They don't know where things begin and end.

Where did this come from? You won't like this.

It came from women taking over the leadership of our institutions, especially education. In the two centuries that public education has existed, there were always a lot of women teachers. But they were superintended by men with a sense of boundaries, who enforced the distinction between thought and feeling, between sense and nonsense. Now you see what has happened with men removed from that picture. Thought and sense have been deleted.

Women are primarily driven by the wish for communion and for care (of children and households). If they don't find mates, don't form households, and don't have children, their drives can be hijacked. Likewise, if their households are broken by divorce and their children are damaged by it. It's been increasingly difficult for men and women to form households and successfully raise children, or to keep a household from breaking under the social and economic pressures of our time.

Politics is another set of institutions increasingly dominated by women in leadership roles. They convert all the social discontents of childlessness and broken households into laws, rules, and policies which, not surprisingly, demonstrate a failed sense of boundaries and a contorted drive for communion and care. That's how the Democratic Party - increasingly run by-and-for women - was bamboozled into throwing the border wide open under "Joe Biden," and why they have become hysterical over the nurturing of those millions of illegal migrants now here. The drive to care has transformed into a mad, grandiose wish to save the world.

The nation's borders are strict boundaries. The Democratic Party programmatically denounces the existence of national boundaries - viz. The "Squad" in Congress, et al. "No one is illegal." That open border was profoundly destructive and costly for the nation. Donald Trump declared that national boundaries matter and closed the border effectively. This not only made him an arch-villain to many of the women in America with boundary problems, but it also gave them a big opportunity to exercise their drive for communion by ginning up public get-togethers such as the anti-ICE riots of last winter and the "No Kings" marches of the spring.

Mr. Trump, with his repertoire of distinctive male mannerisms, setting of boundaries, and bent for decisive action, propels these world-saving, deeply-caring, communion-seeking political women into raptures of rage and animosity. It might be instructive to remind you that, back in the history of this land, among the native-American Iroquois (a most civilized people), it was the women who were assigned the primary task of torturing their enemies to death. (Read about the ordeals of Father Isaac Jogues in Francis Parkman's The Jesuits in North America in the Seventeenth Century.) More recently, one Lindsay Clancy of Duxbury, Mass., demonstrated how savagely awry female boundary failure can go.

This pathocracy of women in the Democratic Party accounts for the seemingly insane turn to communism. But, it's communion-and-care all of a piece - the most extreme form of crazy ideological solidarity, plus the promise of free stuff for everybody (care!) with no boundaries. Meanwhile, over in Mr. Trump's camp, you have an emphatically male-dominated hierarchy with the MAGA women's drives for communion-and-care directed, as much as possible these days, back into the household and the nursery.

Throw in FAFO as the baseline attitude and there's authority you can trust.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 16:20

Midwest Braces For Diesel Crisis After Exxon's Joliet Refinery Suffers Disruption

Zero Hedge -

Midwest Braces For Diesel Crisis After Exxon's Joliet Refinery Suffers Disruption

A major refinery in the US Midwest went offline this week after a power outage, adding to global refining disruptions as US diesel prices reach record highs.

Exxon Mobil shut its 275,000-barrel-a-day Joliet refinery in Illinois on Sunday after a power failure triggered the facility's safety flare, Reuters reported. A Thursday filing also disclosed that floodwater had overwhelmed a pump at the plant.

Exxon traced the power outage to ComEd's primary and secondary lines supplying the refinery and said it had fully restored electricity by Thursday. Power restoration, however, does not mean fuel production has resumed.

Located about 40 miles southwest of Chicago, Joliet can produce about 11 million gallons of gasoline and diesel daily, primarily for Midwest consumers. Its processing capacity represents roughly 6% of Midwest refining capacity and 1.5% nationally. 

A prolonged shutdown would tighten regional fuel availability and risk further price increases across Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Michigan. 

"There's an additional likelihood of further price increases in the Great Lakes. Gas: OH is at *high* risk of largest jump, WI, IN are at *med* risk of moderate jump, MI, IL at low/med risk but could go past $5/gal. diesel: will likely jump in most these areas mod/large jump," Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, wrote on X. 

He noted, "spot diesel prices in the Great Lakes are now the highest in the country... $240/bbl."

Nationwide, the latest AAA data show diesel fuel prices at the pump have jumped to a record $6.45 a gallon.

Goldman Sachs commodity experts Yulia Zhestkova Grigsby and Daan Struyven warned earlier this week that the global diesel crisis could tighten gasoline supplies as refiners prioritize higher-margin diesel production.

Bloomberg Intelligence senior commodity strategist Mike McGlone warned on Monday that "$6 diesel echoes 2008 gasoline shock."

* * *

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 15:55

US Drops Venezuela From List Of Countries Failing To Combat Drug-Trafficking

Zero Hedge -

US Drops Venezuela From List Of Countries Failing To Combat Drug-Trafficking

Authored by Rachel Roberts via The Epoch Times,

The United States has removed Venezuela from its list of countries that it says have failed to demonstrably combat drug trafficking, President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday.

In a statement, Trump said he may also consider removing Colombia - with whom Venezuela shares a long, open border - as well as Bolivia, if these countries can demonstrate progress following recent changes of government.

Following the U.S. capture and arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on charges of narco-terrorism in January, cooperation with the country's interim government is paying dividends, Trump said in the presidential determination published by the State Department.

Cooperation on Tren de Aragua

The U.S. president pointed to the killing of the infamous Tren de Aragua cartel leader known as "Niño Guerrero" as an example of how his government is working well with the new Caracas administration, led by Maduro's former deputy Delcy Rodriguez.

Venezuela has been on the failed list since 2005, when then-Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez kicked U.S. drug enforcement agents out of the country, accusing them of spying on his "Bolivarian Revolution."

"I have determined Venezuela should no longer be designated as having failed demonstrably to fulfill its drug control commitments," Trump said, adding that he expected to see "continued, measurable progress" from the interim government in "dismantling narcoterrorist groups and stopping drug trafficking."

Trump said Colombia was "poised to resume its place as our foremost security partner" in the Western Hemisphere following the election of President Abelardo de la Espriella, with whom he is closely allied, in June.

The U.S. president praised the people of Colombia for making the "courageous choice" of De la Espriella, a former high-profile criminal lawyer whose firm represented figures linked to Colombia's paramilitary and narcotics underworld.

'Colombia First' President

De la Espriella took office in August, pledging a crackdown on illegal immigration and crime, stressing a "Colombia first" approach, as the country joined the growing political rightward shift in Latin America.

Trump said that if, as expected, "Colombia makes progress on aggressive coca eradication and dismantling its narcoterrorist networks over the coming year," he would consider lifting the country's "failed demonstrably" status.

Trump put Colombia on the list last year for failing to combat cocaine production, amid a series of verbal exchanges between him and former leftist President Gustavo Petro.

Before then, Colombia had not been on the list since 1997, four years after the death of the infamous leader of the Medellín drug cartel, Pablo Escobar.

Trump said that cooperation between Bolivia and the United States has "significantly expanded" over the past year, since the 2025 election of President Rodrigo Paz, a conservative.

He praised Bolivia's extradition of alleged drug lord Sebastián Marset, described as one of the most wanted men in South America, to the United States in March 2026.

But he said the new government had not yet had sufficient time to reduce the cultivation of the coca plant for drugs, while corruption in Bolivia continued to facilitate trafficking and impede investigations.

If progress can be made, Trump said he would consider revisiting the country's status.

Four countries - Afghanistan, Bolivia, Burma, and Colombia - are named as having "failed demonstrably" during the past year to make "substantial efforts" to adhere to their obligations under international counternarcotics agreements.

A total of 23 countries, including the four on the "failed" list, are named by the State Department as major transit hubs or producers of narcotics that end up in the United States.

The other Latin American countries on the list are Belize, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, and Peru.

Asian countries named are Afghanistan, Burma, India, Laos, Pakistan, and China.

Caribbean nations listed are the Bahamas, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Haiti, and Jamaica.

The State Department said that a country's presence on the list is "not necessarily a reflection of its government's current counterdrug efforts, or coordination with the United States."

'Billions Seized' From Cartels

In his determination, Trump referred to his war on drugs, much of which has centered on stemming the flow from the southern border and on bombing smugglers' boats.

He said that narcoterrorists responsible for the drugs "invasion" are either "dead, in jail, or living in fear knowing they will be next to face American justice," adding that he had "unleashed the strongest military in the history of the world to strike narcoterrorists wherever they threaten our country."

The Americas Counter Cartel Coalition, an alliance with more than a dozen countries in the Western Hemisphere, has produced "historic results," Trump said, by drastically reducing drug flows and "seizing billions of dollars of illicit cartel finances."

Although progress had been made, Trump said that both Mexico and Canada - which are not on the list - need to "do far more" to prevent trafficking to the United States.

"Canada needs to take meaningful action to dismantle drug labs, strengthen supply chain security, and degrade criminal networks and Chinese gangs operating along our northern border," Trump said, referring specifically to the fentanyl trade.

Turning to China, Trump said the country "continues to be the world's largest producer of many of the precursor chemicals used to illicitly produce fentanyl, methamphetamine, and other deadly synthetic drugs."

He added that he had raised this with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, adding that despite some progress on export licences, China "needs to take more aggressive action" to reduce the flow.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 15:40

"Viva México!": DSA Shoo-In For NYC House Seat Goes 'Mexico First,' Hails "Comrades In Morena"

Zero Hedge -

"Viva México!": DSA Shoo-In For NYC House Seat Goes 'Mexico First,' Hails "Comrades In Morena"

A radical Democratic Socialists of America candidate who is poised to waltz into a deep-blue New York House seat used Mexican Independence Day to all but declare that she is Mexico First.

Claire Valdez, a card-carrying DSA member and New York State Assemblywoman who secured the Democrat nomination for the state's 7th Congressional District, posted a tweet on X celebrating 215 years since Mexicans "fought an empire that demanded our land and our labor." Valdez then went one step further, making the kind of declaration that should end the career of any Democrat or Republican who dared to utter something similar about a foreign country.

"I'll carry that fight with me to Congress as New York's first Mexican American representative," Valdez wrote, before gushing that she is "strengthened not just by Mexico's history but its present" and boasting about a meeting last month with her "comrades in Morena," the leftist party that currently rules Mexico.

Valdez lauded left-wing radicals for "standing up to the empires and corporations that have always taken from us" and "building a government for the working class." The DSA lawmakers capped off the post with a triumphant "¡Viva la Independencia, Viva México!"

Notably absent from Valdez's message was any mention of cutting taxes for struggling New Yorkers, securing the southern border, or tackling the soaring grocery prices that have hammered working families. In their place was the rhetoric of a hard-left activist who apparently views the United States Congress as merely one more battlefield in a global class war, complete with "comrades" embedded in a foreign government. Valdez has claimed that she is "a dual citizen of Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Nation and the United States."

Valdez's tweet quickly ignited a firestorm of condemnation online.

"This is disqualifying," wrote Sen. Jim Banks (R-IN). "You are running for Congress in AMERICA."

Andy Ngo wrote: "American leftists elect people who are open about foreign allegiances and their agenda to serve foreign state interests."

"What the fuck," Pirate Wires Editor-in-Chief Mike Solana added.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 15:20

4 Charged With Fraud Involving Millions Of Taxpayer Dollars For Homelessness Aid

Zero Hedge -

4 Charged With Fraud Involving Millions Of Taxpayer Dollars For Homelessness Aid

Authored by Jacki Thrapp via The Epoch Times,

Federal prosecutors in California on Sept. 16 announced charges against four people who are accused of diverting millions of taxpayer dollars meant for homeless housing and services to fund lavish lifestyles, including a new nightclub and bingo hall.

The defendants accused in the separate schemes include nonprofit Home At Last founder Michael Young, CEO and executive director of The Big Blue Umbrella Donye Mitchell, and Special Service for Groups employee Lakiya Malone.

The fourth defendant, executive director of the nonprofit Abundant Blessings Alexander Soofer, agreed to plead guilty to one count of wire fraud and one count of money laundering for taking at least $2 million in taxpayer funds for personal gain.

Attorneys for the defendants could not be reached. Home At Last did not immediately return a request for comment.

The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California said on Wednesday that Young, a founder of the Culver City-based nonprofit, was arrested and charged with "sham vendor fraud."

He allegedly committed fraud to misappropriate more than $7.5 million in taxpayer funds to open and operate personal projects, such as a high-end restaurant and nightclub in Inglewood and an adjacent bingo hall.

The money he received from Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority was supposed to be used toward providing housing and services to homeless people. Instead, prosecutors allege, he made a web of shell corporations and fraudulent billing practices to boost his real estate portfolio, which included $1 million in taxpayer dollars to open the Six Seven Five Lounge restaurant and nightclub.

"Taxpayer money also allegedly paid for a liquor license for that business, in addition to the architect, developer, and high-end finishes for this nightclub," Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's National Fraud Enforcement Division Colin McDonald said during a press conference on Wednesday.

"The taxpayers did not sign up to fund this nightclub."

Young is charged with wire fraud, a felony that carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison if convicted.

In a separate case, Donye Mitchell, the CEO of The Big Blue Umbrella, was awarded more than $1.2 million in Los Angeles County-funded grant money from Amity Foundation after allegedly claiming his nonprofit was a major homeless-housing provider, which prosecutors say was false.

Mitchell is accused of using grant funds on inflated salary payments, paying his bail for domestic violence and assault charges, paying off credit card debt, transferring money to family, paying rent, and paying charges associated with his PlayStation.

Amity allegedly canceled the contract with The Big Blue Umbrella in May 2025 after it already sent $315,000. Amity's decision to cut ties was over concerns that Mitchell misrepresented his spending and failed to meet agreed-upon milestones.

Mitchell, who is not in custody and considered a fugitive on Sept. 16, is also charged with wire fraud.

"L.A. is called, they say, the City of Angels, but there's nothing angelic about bribery, about stealing money from taxpayers, about lying, about serving our nation's most vulnerable citizens, and while these fraudsters have lined their pockets, American people have been dying in our streets," Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner said.

In the third case, Malone, an employee of the nonprofit Special Service for Groups, was arrested on a 21-count indictment that accused her of taking more than $180,000 in bribes and kickbacks from Alexander Soofer in exchange for priority housing referrals, including "ghost" clients who never lived at the sites.

Prosecutors say the scheme included making fake welcome letters, sign-in sheets, and eligibility forms that helped inflate more than $17 million that Soofer received from Special Service for Groups.

Malone faces up to 20 years per wire fraud count, 10 years per bribery count, and five years on the conspiracy charge if convicted.

"The scale and brazenness of these fraudsters expose a profound failure by the State of California and Los Angeles County to safeguard public funds," First Assistant United States Attorney Bill Essayli said.

"Millions [of dollars] intended to house the homeless allegedly financed private real estate, a nightclub, a bingo hall, and personal expenses. Taxpayers deserve accountability.

"We will follow the money, expose the corruption, and prosecute those who exploit the American people for personal gain."

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 15:00

America Is Using The Wrong Artificial Intelligence Scoreboard

Zero Hedge -

America Is Using The Wrong Artificial Intelligence Scoreboard

Authored by Paul Meeks via RealClearMarkets,

Since OpenAI released ChatGPT in late 2022, America has kept score in the artificial intelligence race by asking which lab has the best model. Unfortunately, that scoreboard is dangerously incomplete. Frontier capability matters, but temporary benchmark leads do not by themselves create durable technological dominance by any single nation. The true national edge comes when its technology becomes the platform on which the world builds.

The distinction came into focus at the White House in August. Administration officials met with leading AI companies to discuss a voluntary framework for government testing of the most advanced models before release. However, the framework will not cover open-weight models, whose underlying parameters can be downloaded and adapted. That was the right decision. But declining to restrict open models is not the same as having a strategy to ensure that the world builds on American models.

The Trump administration already understands the stakes. Its AI Action Plan warns that open models could become global standards in business and research and therefore have "geostrategic value." It calls for leading open models founded on American values. The insight is correct. Implementation has not kept pace with the market.

In strict technical terms, open-weight is not the same as open-source. The former makes a model's learned parameters available; the latter also implies access to such elements as training code and data. Most models commonly called "open-source AI," including China's leading releases, are actually open-weight. Economically, however, the important point is that users can download, operate and adapt them without remaining dependent on a single provider.

American companies dominate the market for high-end closed models. Customers access them through websites or application programming interfaces, while the companies retain the model weights and charge for usage. China has pursued a different strategy. Its developers are releasing increasingly capable open-weight models cheaply or freely, inviting companies, researchers and governments to customize them and build products on top of them.

This is where China is converting diffusion into market power. Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 reached the top tier of global models while being released open-weight. Alibaba's Qwen family has spawned more than 100,000 derivative models on Hugging Face, more than any Western model family. The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission's 2026 "Two Loops" analysis even cites one Andreessen Horowitz partner's rough estimate that 80% of American startups use Chinese base models to develop derivatives for their businesses.

Even if that figure is only directionally correct, the warning is extraordinary. A meaningful share of America's AI application layer may already rest on Chinese foundations because developers found capable, affordable and adaptable models when they needed them.

We are in a contest over far more than individual models. It is also a contest over the technology stack on which they will run. This will shape the skills developers learn, the products entrepreneurs build, the infrastructure customers buy, and ultimately own the standards that eventually become difficult to dislodge. America's objective should be clear: the world's AI economy should be built primarily on an American and allied technology stack.

China knows - and is building policy around the fact - that every adoption strengthens the ecosystem. Developers create compatible tools. Workers learn model-specific skills. Investors finance complementary applications. Businesses integrate the technology into workflows that become costly to change. The resulting feedback loop attracts more users and produces more improvements. In investor terms, diffusion creates the moat. In foreign policy terms, diffusion locks in global influence.

American closed-model companies are not behaving irrationally. Restricting access protects intellectual property and produces recurring revenue. But the business model that maximizes revenue for a few companies does not necessarily maximize American economic power. A closed model can sell many tokens while an open competitor becomes the technological language learned by the rest of the world. Washington should not confuse the commercial interests of dominant vendors with a national strategy.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has raised the strongest objection towards open-source diffusion warning that once capable model weights are released, they cannot be withdrawn, and bad actors may use them without guardrails or monitoring. That concern deserves a serious response but it also does not justify American abstention. China will continue releasing capable open models regardless of what U.S. labs do. Unilateral restraint would not reduce the number of open models in circulation; it would determine which country supplies them.

America has the computing power, talent and capital to lead both the closed and open portions of the AI market. What it lacks is a sustained strategy to put those advantages into circulation - and to ensure that the developers, companies and governments adopting AI abroad can build on trusted American technology rather than becoming dependent on Chinese model ecosystems.

The AI race will not be decided by which company tops the next benchmark. It will be decided by whose technology stack becomes indispensable: whose models developers choose, whose tools they learn, whose infrastructure they deploy and whose standards organize the applications built above them. Implementing an American open-weight strategy is not a departure from AI dominance. It is how America ensures that the world builds on an American technology stack - and how technological leadership becomes durable.

Paul Meeks is a technology-sector investor with more than 30 years of experience in public and private markets. He is a Professor of Practice at The Citadel's Baker School of Business.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 14:52

China Rare Earth Giant Eyes Takeover Of MP Materials' Seventh-Largest Shareholder As Resource War Intensifies

Zero Hedge -

China Rare Earth Giant Eyes Takeover Of MP Materials' Seventh-Largest Shareholder As Resource War Intensifies

One way to view the Reuters report saying that state-owned China Rare Earth Group is in takeover talks with Shenghe Resources is that the deal could further cement Beijing's control over critical materials, especially rare earths. But what's most intriguing is that Shenghe holds a minority stake in US rare earth producer MP Materials.

The potential takeover would bring one of China's top rare earth mining and refining companies under the state group's control, with some private ownership. It would also extend that control to Shenghe's overseas holdings, including a 3.11% stake (7th largest shareholder) in MP Materials.

The outlet reported:

Talks between the two companies have been underway since earlier this year, said the sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of the matter. China Rare Earth Group wants to take a controlling stake, one of the people said.

The takeover would almost certainly cause some alarms in Washington: a major Chinese state-owned supplier could inherit a minority holding in a US company amid efforts by Washington to break China's stranglehold on critical materials supplied to the West.

The sources did not know what would happen to Shenghe's foreign assets and stakes.

In terms of leverage, China Rare Earth Group's takeover of Shenghe Resources would give Beijing tighter control over materials that are critical to electric vehicles, wind turbines, electronics and the defense sector. These are the same materials that Beijing has restricted some access to the US over the past 1.5 years amid a resource war. 

Recall that one move in Beijing's playbook was buying Canada's only antimony mine and then shutting down operations several years ago. Antimony is a critical mineral used in military hardware, from small arms and artillery shells to advanced missile seekers and night-vision goggles.

Beijing's leverage over the US lies in critical materials, while the US crusade from Venezuela to the Strait of Hormuz has been about leveling the playing field with China and squeezing Beijing's access to crude.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 14:40

Flock Camera Ping Jails Innocent Woman For 13 Days

Zero Hedge -

Flock Camera Ping Jails Innocent Woman For 13 Days

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity News,

A 23-year-old Palm Coast Florida woman spent 13 days in a Volusia County jail cell facing life in prison after Florida Highway Patrol troopers treated a Flock Safety camera hit like a confession.

Lindsey Brooke Isaacs did not cause the crash. Her black Dodge Durango had no collision damage. A 911 caller had already described a maroon Durango and a partial plate that was not hers. None of that stopped the machine-assisted hunt.

The October 4, 2025 hit-and-run on eastbound I-4 near DeBary killed motorcyclist Joaquin Deno, Flagler County Deputy Administrator Jorge Salinas, and Salinas' wife, Nancy. A fourth person was badly hurt. Witnesses described a Dodge Durango fleeing the scene. Investigators searched nearby Flock cameras for a black Durango and found Isaacs' tag, RJVN10, crossing the Seminole-Volusia line at 9:51 p.m., about three miles west of a wreck that started around 9:53 p.m.

That ping became the case.

Troopers later pounded on Isaacs' door while she was asleep. "I thought I was getting set up. I didn't understand what was going on," she said. They seized the Durango for months and claimed "marks" consistent with the crash.

Photographs later showed an immaculate 2025 SUV. "Where is the damage on the vehicle? Because I'm standing right in front of it and I don't see any damage," Isaacs recalled.

On April 17, 2026, FHP booked her on eight felonies, including three counts of vehicular homicide and three counts of leaving the scene of a crash involving death. She was held without bond, then sat in G Block for 13 days. "Being incarcerated, falsely incarcerated, in jail, in G Block, was the worst 13 days in my life," she said. "I was devastated, I was scared. I thought my life was over."

Attorney Patrick McGeehan did the work the camera search replaced. A time-and-distance analysis using the same Flock timestamp put Isaacs past the crash site when the collision happened. "In Lindsey's case, there was nothing indicating that she was ever there," he said.

A 911 caller described a maroon Durango and the partial plate "458." Paint transfer on a struck Ford Focus was maroon. Isaacs' plate did not match. Witnesses had described three different vehicles: black, white, and maroon. "For some reason, [Florida Highway Patrol] never went past the black Dodge Durango," McGeehan said. "They hooked onto this black Dodge Durango to the exclusion of everything else." He called it "confirmation bias, to the highest degree" and "a major failure of basic investigative skills."

"Lindsey wasn't even at the crash scene," he told NewsNation. "These were investigators that got it in their mind that there was a black Dodge Durango involved. They got on Flock, found the first black Dodge Durango, that belonged to Lindsey Isaacs, and pinned that on her."

On May 22, 2026, prosecutors dropped every charge. The same day, they arrested 47-year-old Alisa Lee Montalvo of Deltona, whose maroon Durango and plate beginning 458 lined up with the original 911 call.

Authorities say her SUV had crash damage, she paid a mechanic to replace doors, pull airbags, and change tires, and an event data recorder later showed roughly 112 mph seconds before impact. Montalvo faces nine counts, including vehicular homicide and tampering with evidence. She has pleaded not guilty. Those charges remain allegations.

Isaacs walked out with a ruined name and a federal lawsuit against FHP Sgts. Tiffany Jateff and Joshua Buday, alleging false arrest and malicious prosecution. "I have to carry this like a big bag of bricks for the rest of my life," she said. "I'm still receiving death threats and hate." She is not suing Flock. She blames how troopers used the footage. "They just picked up my car off a camera and called it the end of the day. We got her."

Flock's answer is corporate and tidy. "Flock cameras provide investigative leads; they do not identify perpetrators, determine guilt, or make arrest decisions," a spokesperson said. The company notes Isaacs' own complaint calls the camera record "exculpatory, not inculpatory," because it placed her three miles away two minutes before the crash.

This is the dragnet Gov. Ron DeSantis ordered off state highways. FDOT revoked every permit for Flock units and other automated plate readers in state right-of-way and gave agencies 30 days to pull them. Miss the deadline, and state crews tear the poles down.

"I think these cameras, the license plate readers, I think it's out of control," DeSantis said. He drew the line most voters can understand. "I'm all about having law enforcement have tools to be able to hold criminals accountable... But I don't want to have this become a surveillance state." On another stop: "What we don't want in the state of Florida is to have a digital AI surveillance state where everything we're doing is being tracked at all times." His example was a drive to Buc-ee's. "It's really none of the government's damn business if you're doing that, right?"

Isaacs' case is that argument with a booking photo attached. A tool sold as an Amber Alert machine became a nationwide movement file. Officers in Florida have already used the same network as a stalking app - hundreds of plate runs on exes and partners in Haines City, Sarasota, Sumter, Orange City, Monroe, and Brevard. Texas froze state funding after similar abuse. Cities from Dallas to El Paso to Clark County, Wisconsin, have cut contracts or bagged the lenses.

Knox County, Tennessee, Mayor Glenn Jacobs, the former WWE star Kane, got there first on the product itself. He thought Flock was a passive hit-on-a-hot-list reader. Then he read the contract.

"What I discovered is these things are completely different than that," Jacobs said. "Instead of a passive system... these cameras are an active system that's pulling data from every car that drives by." The snapshot feeds an AI "vehicular fingerprint" - make, model, color, roof racks, bumper stickers. He told Flock the 2020 Knox County deal was invalid after purchases blew past the $100,000 threshold that required County Commission approval, and he refused to renew more than 140 cameras.

"The lack of transparency surrounding Flock's rollout is one of the most troubling aspects about all this," he posted. "It's sure seems like there was a sprint towards a fait accompli before the public took notice."

McGeehan's verdict on the Florida grid is shorter. "It's a good tool, but now it's unrestricted. It's the Wild West of Flock."

Isaacs used to think they were traffic cameras. "I feel very different about those cameras now," she said. "It's like, they're watching me. They're watching, you know? They're watching everybody."

That is the product. A searchable history of who drove where, handed to whoever has a login, and treated in this case as enough to put an innocent woman in a cell for three deaths she did not cause. Targeted tools for actual criminals are not the argument. A warrantless travel dossier on every driver is.

* * *

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 14:20

Barclays Sees Two Key Drivers Behind A Potential Tesla Q3 Delivery Beat

Zero Hedge -

Barclays Sees Two Key Drivers Behind A Potential Tesla Q3 Delivery Beat

Tesla is expected to report third-quarter earnings in late October. 

Ahead of the release, Barclays autos analyst Dan Levy expects deliveries to "beat" consensus, driven by two key factors: stronger Full Self-Driving adoption and rising exports from Shanghai.

FSD

First, FSD uptake is increasingly relevant - not only in serving as the "consumer AV" element of Tesla's AV push, but also in providing both a margin boost, and perhaps more importantly a volume boost to Tesla. Indeed, Tesla's 2Q delivery beat was in part driven by North America, and we assume that with FSD uptake of 55% in the quarter, buyers are increasingly choosing Tesla because of FSD.

Asia Demand

Tesla is increasingly benefiting from its China exports. In our visit to Giga Shanghai last week as part of our China Autos fieldtrip (see here and here), we were reminded of Tesla's significant cost advantage in Shanghai. We believe exports from Shanghai may be at least 20% of Tesla's global volume this year, and many rest-of-world markets which had previously been afterthoughts (i.e. Australia, Colombia, Asia ex-China) are now providing key volume boosts.

Levy estimates Tesla will deliver about 475,000 vehicles, above Wall Street consensus of roughly 466,000 and above his previous forecast of 450,000. However, that would represent a decline of about 4% from a year earlier and 1% from the second quarter.

Tesla is tracking toward 1.8 million deliveries for this year, up 10% from last year but back to its 2023 peak. 

"We believe a solid 3Q deliveries result would be a further validation point that Tesla's vehicle growth has inflected positively, which became more evident after the significant 2Q delivery beat (480k vs cons 406k). Recall, at 2Q mgmt noted Tesla exited the quarter with its largest backlog since 2023, implying the potential for further growth ahead. We now turn to 3Q commentary for reads as to whether mgmt continues to see robust demand ahead," Levy said. 

Barclays regional TSLA deliveries forecast

Levy pointed out that a delivery beat would not translate into stronger margins. He expects automotive gross margin, excluding regulatory credits and including stock-based compensation, to remain flat or edge below the second quarter's 16.3%.

Tesla shares have slumped 18% year to date as of early Friday morning.

Wall Street analysts tracked by Bloomberg have assigned 29 "Buy" ratings, 24 "Hold" ratings and 8 "Sell" ratings, with an average 12-month price target of $391.

Looking ahead, there has been Tesla-SpaceX merger rumors this summer (read full report). 

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 14:00

K-Shaped Economy: Reality Or Media-Driven Perception

Zero Hedge -

K-Shaped Economy: Reality Or Media-Driven Perception

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

“What the K-shaped economy gets right, what it exaggerates, and what believing the worst version is costing a generation.”

The bottom half of American households owns about 2.5% of the nation’s wealth. That number is real, and it ought to bother you. However, that number is also higher than it was in 2019 and 2015, and roughly six times higher than the 0.4% low it hit in 2011. You will not read that in many places because it doesn’t “fit the narrative.”

Unfortunately, the K-shaped economy headlines have settled into a single unvarying note, and after a while, people stop hearing anything else. I’ve spent the past several weeks working through the underlying data. While there is some truth to the coverage, most of the claims are exaggerated for “clicks and views.” But the psychological damage is clear.

So, before we get into our discussion, here are some numbers for you.

Where The K-Shaped Economy Headlines Are Right

Let me start where the “Persistent Purveyors of Doom” crowd bases its argument, as there is indeed a K-Shaped economy. However, what is critical to understand is that the K-shaped economy is not new. In every economy throughout history, there has always been a K-shaped divide between those at the bottom and those at the top.

Nonetheless, as the headlines suggest, the wage compression of 2020 through 2023 was extraordinary. Autor, Dube, and McGrew documented it in their paper “The Unexpected Compression.” The 90/10 wage ratio fell far enough to reverse roughly a third of forty years of divergence.1 Then it stopped, and worse, it began running the other way.

The Economic Policy Institute data for 2025 show that real wages at the 10th percentile fell by 0.3%, while the median rose by 0.8%.2 The lowest-paid workers in America went from the fastest-growing group in the distribution to the only one moving backward.

However, the Cleveland Fed adds a detail that should end many K-shaped economy arguments. Between 2020 and late 2025, real wages at the 10th percentile rose 9.7% against 4.5% at the 90th. In dollars, that’s $1.34 an hour against $3.09.3 Percentage compression off a small base is not catching up. And the 2015 to 2020 dollar gains were LARGER at every percentile in the bottom half than the celebrated pandemic-era gains were.

The price level is also crucial to discuss, and is where I think most commentary goes soft. Inflation falling from 9% to 3.4% is a change in the rate, not the level. Since December 2019, consumer prices have risen by roughly 29% and have stayed there. That is a permanent shift in the cost of living, and it is the part of the K-shaped economy argument that sticks, and it hits households with no assets the hardest.

As I’ve written before, wage growth as a leading inflation indicator” matters for policy. The level is where people actually live. McKinsey asked 30,119 Americans this April, and 60% named the cost of living as one of their top three barriers. That held even with those over $150,000 in income.

Furthermore, the hiring rate hit 3.1% in February 2026, the lowest reading outside the pandemic, while the share of unemployed workers for 27 weeks or more reached 27.5% in May. Separately, expiration of the enhanced ACA credits pushed average net marketplace premiums up 58% and average deductibles up 37% in a single year.4 That is a real, dated, 2026 hit to exactly the households everyone is arguing about.

The honest summary is that the ladder from the bottom of the K to the top got harder to climb, even as the rungs themselves stopped moving apart.

Where The K-Shaped Economy Headlines Are Exaggerated

The single most repeated statistic in this entire debate, the one anchoring roughly every set of K-shaped economy headlines you have scrolled past this year, is that the top 10% of earners account for about half of all consumer spending.

It comes from Moody’s Analytics. The number is shakier than it looks. Moody’s revised its own estimate down from 49.2% to 45.8% after a methodology change, and Mark Zandi told reporters plainly that he “wouldn’t die on the hill of the top 10% accounting for 45% of the spending.”5 Berkeley’s Antoine Levy points out the arithmetic problem: the top decile takes home 35% to 40% of disposable income and saves a fifth of it, so its spending share cannot be half. The BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey puts the figure at 22.9%.

While you may think that is just economists arguing amongst themselves, it isn’t. What is crucial to note is that when the number that anchors the entire narrative varies by a factor of two depending on who computes it, that is a problem. In other words, the narrative is doing work the data cannot support. Such is the nature of a story that has outrun its evidence.

Furthermore, the perception gap runs deeper than just one statistic. In that same McKinsey survey, 56% of consumers named food as the category with the largest price increase in 2024.6 Here is why that is important. During that same period, insurance, housing, and childcare all rose faster, meaning that people are not tracking the data.

In other words, people are tracking what they hear on television and read on social media, and the two have become detached.

Where The K-Shaped Economy Headlines Are Simply Wrong

Here is where it gets interesting.

Everyone “knows” wealth concentration is worse than ever. As I laid out in my earlier piece on the K-shaped economy and why the middle class moved up, the income story runs in the opposite direction from the coverage.

The wealth story is stranger still. Pull the Federal Reserve’s Distributional Financial Accounts and compute it yourself, and the top 10% share of household net worth peaked at 70.3% in the first quarter of 2019. It sits at 67.9% today. The bottom 50% share bottomed at 0.4% in late 2011, was 1.7% at the end of 2019, and is 2.5% now.

When looking at wealth concentrations, it is very easy to blame those at the top of the wealth pyramid. Yes,  the top 10% of the population held a 31.8% share of economic wealth in the fourth quarter of 2025. Yet the bottom half gains since 2019 came almost entirely from the 90th to 99th percentiles, which fell from 39.7% to 36.3%. In plain English, the professional class lost relative ground, not the working class. Such is a detail that changes who you think is complaining.

Furthermore, the recovery that no one called K-shaped was far worse. Between 2007 and 2016, median wealth for the bottom 30% of families fell 31% while the top 10% fully recovered.7 Saez found the top 1% captured 91% of real income growth from 2009 to 2012. Nobody ran a K headline in 2013. The data was uglier then.

The last false claim is the one that worries me most, because young people believe it about themselves. That is the real damage the K-shaped economy headlines have done. Vanguard’s administrative records show 401(k) participation among young workers at 54%, against 28% for the same age group in 2004. Savings rates are higher, and average balances have roughly doubled.8 Vanguard’s own model puts 47% of Gen Z on track to sustain their standard of living in retirement, seven points ahead of the boomers. The problem is NOT that young people stopped saving

McKinsey found the same thing from the other direction. Adults aged 18 to 24 face the worst entry-level labor market in decades, and 34% name mental health as their top barrier, against 14% of older adults. Yet they were more likely than any other older group to say their finances will improve and that their lives have momentum.

The generation everyone is writing eulogies for has not read them.

Do The K-Shaped Economy Headlines Become Self-Fulfilling?

This is the question I actually wanted answered, so I went looking for the research. Does talking constantly about a K-shaped economy help create one? The answer splits cleanly in two, and almost nobody reports both halves.

At the level of the whole economy, no. The Chicago Fed published the number in June. The correlation between the Michigan sentiment index and annual real consumer spending growth ran 0.69 before 2020. Since 2020, it has been roughly zero.9 Their composite estimate says Michigan currently understates sentiment by 25 to 30 index points. About 10 of those points trace to the 2024 switch from telephone to online collection. Then there is the receipt test. A Fed study matched roughly 10,000 survey responses to verified purchase records. Some 43% said they were doing worse than in 2019. Most had actually bought more.

Secondly, Barsky and Sims settled the mechanism years ago: confidence is a leading indicator, not a cause.

In the economy, confidence carries information that people already have; in a survey, they respond to what they have read or seen, rather than to what they expect. This is also the structural reason why the doom loop can’t close at the macro level. Bank runs feed on themselves because if you withdraw your money, it makes my withdrawal smarter. However, in the economy, consumption lacks this property. Your neighbor skipping a vacation does nothing to make skipping yours a better idea. Such is why sentiment can collapse, and spending can increase.

At the level of one household, yes, and this is where it bites. The K-shaped economy doom loop is real. It just doesn’t run through GDP. It runs through the handful of large, irreversible decisions a person makes over a lifetime.

The clearest evidence comes from Bailey and co-authors. They matched 1.4 million Facebook users to 525,000 housing transactions, then used the house price experiences of geographically distant friends to isolate the belief channel. When distant friends saw 5 percentage points more price appreciation, a renter’s probability of buying rose 3.1 points off an 18% base.10 Beliefs picked up socially, from people nowhere near your housing market, changed whether you bought a house.

Now apply that to a young person marinating in K-shaped economy headlines. I’ve pushed back before on the lazy version of this story, the one painting a whole generation as financial nihilists. That framing is still wrong. The behavior at the margin has gotten worse anyway. Baker and colleagues at Northwestern, using transaction data on 230,000 households, found that every dollar wagered on sports betting reduces net household investment by about 99 cents.11 Not lottery spending. Not other gambling. Savings.

The damage compounds from there. New York Fed researchers found credit card delinquency rates rising 1.02 percentage points among households under 40 in states that legalized. Furthermore, separate work by UCLA and USC estimates that roughly 30,000 additional bankruptcies a year are attributable to online betting.12 The same restlessness shows up in the options tape. Zero-day contracts reached 65% of total SPX volume in May 2026. Citadel Securities reports that nearly half of all retail options volume on its platform now expires on the same day, up from 13% in 2021.

None of that is saving or investing, and it is the real culprit behind the “K-shaped economy” narrative. In other words, the narrative is driving behavior that is creating the outcome. As we documented in our work on why retail traders consistently underperformthe average retail equity investor earned 16.54% in 2024, compared with 25.02% for the index. The performance gap is due to behavior, not access.

While everyone agrees that the economy is hopeless for the young, the agreement itself is the tell.

What To Do About It

Are there problems in the economy? Yes. Let’s recap what we know.

But here is the real question to ask yourself, particularly if you “feel” like your future is hopeless.

“Do you have the ability to change your outcome?”

That answer is unequivocally – “yes.” You just have to be willing to do the work.

First, fix your benchmark. You are not competing with a stranger’s vacation photos or the top 1% of a country of 340 million people. The relevant comparison is your own plan, and whether this year moved you closer to it. Everything in thinking like an investor rather than a speculator starts there. McKinsey found Americans with strong community ties were nearly four times as likely to feel their lives have momentum. Only a third felt they were connected. Trade some screen time for the other thing.

Second, stop gambling and call it what it is. Nobody ever bet their way out of the K-shaped economy. Will a sports parlay occasionally pay off? Sure. Will it build wealth over 30 years? The data is very clear that it doesn’t. More notably, the ones betting are also the ones who can least afford it.

Third, set goals you can actually hit. The $1.46 million “magic number” that circulates every January is a survey artifact from a company that sells retirement products. It is not your number. The number you need to focus on comes from your spending, your timeline, and your obligations, which is a smaller and far more solvable problem than headlines imply.

Fourth, automate the boring parts. The reason that Gen Z is projected to retire better than the boomers is not superior discipline. It is auto-enrollment. Company 401 (k) plans that enroll workers by default have a 94% participation rate, compared with 64% for voluntary plans. Design beats willpower, every time.

On housing, I recently argued that home affordability is better than the headlines suggest, and that holds for the monthly payment burden. Harvard’s housing center set home prices near five times the median income, up from roughly three times in the 1990s. That is indeed a barrier to entry.

However, the down payment for homes today is 3% versus 20% in the 1990’s. So, yes, the payment is manageable once you’re in, but the hard part is saving up for the down payment. I get that, and here is the hard truth. If you can’t save up a 3% down payment, you have other financial problems (e.g., overspending) that you need to resolve first. The mortgage payment is one thing; the taxes, fees, maintenance, and everything else that goes with the joy of homeownership is quite another.

The K-shaped economy is real, and it is old. What changed isn’t the shape of the economy; it’s just that the media found a narrative that gets lots of clicks and views, and we let headlines do our thinking for us.

Believe the headlines, and you will make exactly the decisions that guarantee they come true for you.

* * *

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 13:40

Auto Stocks Slide As VW Cuts Outlook, Industry Urges Trump To Keep BYD Cars Out

Zero Hedge -

Auto Stocks Slide As VW Cuts Outlook, Industry Urges Trump To Keep BYD Cars Out

Earnings pressure and trade-policy uncertainty are weighing on auto stocks on Friday.

Volkswagen shares fell as much as 7.5% after the struggling European automaker lowered its operating-margin forecast, reflecting a write-down on its Porsche stake and weak Chinese demand.

Separately, US auto industry groups urged the Trump administration to maintain restrictions on Chinese vehicles, according to a Bloomberg report.

"Allowing them to open a domestic facility would provide a foothold in the US market at the expense of manufacturers operating here," the coalition wrote.

Signatories include the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, whose members include Ford, General Motors, Toyota and Volkswagen, alongside Autos Drive America, the American Automotive Policy Council and the National Automobile Dealers Association.

The letter to the White House, seen by Bloomberg, comes less than a week before President Trump meets with Chinese leader Xi Jinping next Thursday. It warns that a flood of Chinese BYD vehicles would undercut and upend domestic automakers and parts suppliers.

Europe's move to welcome BYD has been nothing but trouble for the continent, which is seeing its industrial base hollowed out further.

The S&P 500 Automobiles & Components Index remains in a descending channel. 

In US markets, General Motors shares fell 5% this morning, their steepest intraday decline since June, as selling spread across the auto sector. Ford dropped 4%, while Stellantis' US-listed shares slid 5%.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 13:20

Yen Jumps On Report Of BOJ "Rate Check" But It's "Too Little Too Late"

Zero Hedge -

Yen Jumps On Report Of BOJ "Rate Check" But It's "Too Little Too Late"

Update: (12:40pm ET)

The Bank of Japan, not to mentioned Scott "the House" Bessent, have been most displeased with the yen plunge following today's BOJ rate hike, and so they once again do what they do pretty much every other week now: intervene in the market. 

As we said earlier (see below) when we predicted that some sort of central bank intervention was inevitable, the yen pared declines on Friday after Japan's Nikkei newspaper reported that the Bank of Japan had conducted a rate check in the foreign-exchange market.

Just as it was intended, the report immediately reversed some of the yen’s huge losses triggered earlier in the session by disappointment among traders who had wanted clearer guidance from the central bank on its plans to raise borrowing costs further to stabilize inflation, following a widely expected rate increase on Friday. Instead, what they got were two dissenters appointed by the ultradovish Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, with two more members due to leave the board next year and likely also replaced by more dovish policymakers, thus kneecapping expectations for more rate hikes. 

Such intervention is meant to squeeze speculative yen shorts and accelerate a move in thin markets, but its ability to produce a lasting reversal may depend on monetary policy. The Fed’s renewed tightening cycle threatens to keep the US-Japan rate differential wide even after Friday’s BOJ rate increase, preserving the incentive for investors to borrow in yen to fund higher-yielding positions elsewhere.

Speculative positioning is also lighter than before the previous intervention. Leveraged funds halved their bearish yen bets in the week through Sept. 8, according to CFTC data, leaving fewer short positions to squeeze if authorities step in again.

The Japanese currency was down 0.6% at 156.83 per dollar at about 12:30 p.m. ET after losing as much as 1.3% earlier in the session. The Nikkei reported that the BOJ inquired with market participants about exchange-rate levels, without saying where it got the information. Such a move has previously preceded official intervention. 

“This is too little, too late,” said Win Thin, chief economist at Bank of Nassau 1982. “The BOJ had another chance to go big and they missed it, same as July. If they really wanted to boost the yen, they should have hiked more than expected and then intervene massively.”

As reported earlier, the yen had weakened to about 158 per dollar after BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda sent mixed signals on the path for future rate hikes following the bank’s widely expected increase. While he said the stage for policy setting has shifted, he also said it was difficult to determine the terminal rate for the current tightening cycle. Analysts saw his remarks as falling short of the market’s increasingly hawkish expectations.

Japan has entered a holiday period through next Wednesday, when thinner liquidity could amplify the impact of any official intervention. Authorities used a similar window around the Golden Week holiday period this year, first stepping in after the yen weakened beyond 160 just before the holidays and then apparently intervening again during the thinly traded period.

Of course, neither of the previous interventions worked, and this one will fail as well. 

Japan and the US conducted a coordinated yen-buying operation this summer, the first since 1998, raising the stakes for traders betting against the yen. Japan spent a record ¥15.4 trillion on intervention in the month through Aug. 26, according to Finance Ministry data. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has since continued to signal support for a stronger yen.

Despite the coordinate global attempts to boost the yen, the fundamental pressures weighing on the yen remain in place, including Japan’s wide interest-rate gap with other major economies, concerns over the fiscal outlook under Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s expansionary spending plans, and - of course - the biggest debt load in history, where every rate hike will lead to much more interest expense.

* * *

Earlier:

The yen sank to a two-week low against the dollar ​on Friday after two policy makers at the Bank of Japan dissented from a widely expected decision to raise ‌interest rates, extinguishing expectations for back-to-back hikes. Governor Kazuo Ueda now needs, at a minimum, to preserve expectations for a December move to prevent markets from unwinding most if note all of the tightening path already priced into rates.

While Japanese policymakers pushed rates to their highest level in 31 years at 1.25%, the move failed to boost the currency as traders felt there was a lack of explicitly hawkish guidance.

As a result of the dovish split, the yen tumbled and the US dollar rose more than 1.2% against the Japanese currency, hitting a a ​two-week high of 158.07 yen after wavering during BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda's press conference. It was set for its biggest daily increase versus the ​yen since December and the largest weekly rally since September 2024.

Traders had already discounted the equivalent of another hike by year-end before today’s policy meeting, leaving a high bar for any hawkish surprise. The presence of two dissenters signals that support for another rate increase in October is weakening, with OIS assigning around a 20% probability to such an outcome. That leaves Ueda’s press conference carrying the burden of preserving expectations for a December hike and keeping the BOJ on a tightening path that at least matches the Fed’s recent pace.

"They've just clearly underwhelmed versus expectations here," ⁠said Ray Attrill, head of FX strategy at National Australia Bank in Sydney. "And I think that one of the more staggering aspects ​of it was that they couldn't even get the unanimous vote for that," he said. "That really raised eyebrows in the market."

"The statement offered little additional hawkish guidance to support ​bullish Japanese yen positions," said Frantisek Taborsky, currency strategist at ING. "The dissent from (Toichiro) Asada and (Ayano) Sato points to resistance against the fastest pace of rate ‌increases in ⁠more than three decades and suggests they may increasingly act as a brake on further tightening."

According to Mizuho strategists, the dissenters raise concerns that further rate hikes become harder to deliver, potentially steepening the JGB yield curve. Senior strategist Masayuki Nakajima said that Friday’s two dissenters were appointed by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi. Two more members are due to leave the board next year and could potentially be replaced by more dovish policymakers

“Should their successors come from the reflationist camp, four of the nine Board members would become dovish,” he says; “While that would still fall short of a majority, it could reinforce expectations that sustaining the tightening cycle may become more difficult in the future”

“If so, concerns that the BOJ is falling behind the curve could re-emerge, potentially leading to further curve steepening,” he added.

Commenting on the market reaction, Bloomberg's Ven Ram said that the decision was: 

  • marred by dissent from two policymakers who voted against the hike;
  • there was none who called for a bigger margin of increase;
  • and the accompanying statement, while vowing to continue raising rates, failed to signal a sense of urgency by not saying when they will come.

Japan’s benchmark rate still trails the neutral rate by a considerable margin, and without back-to-back interest-rate hikes, the yen will stay weaker for longer. Only the franc carries a lower interest rate in the G-10 economies, with the Swiss central bank due to meet next week. Should that monetary authority reiterate its preference for keeping rates at zero, it will engender low volatility in two of the major exchange rates that represent the preferred funding currencies.

After a slew of central bank meetings and with Brent crude headed for the first weekly decline this month, global bonds that were deeply oversold are finding some respite. Longer-dated gilts received a boost from the Bank of England’s plan to pause bond sales and stop selling securities that mature in 2049 or later. Gilts with a maturity of 30 years stand to benefit considerably, so an immediate follow-through of Thursday’s rally is likely even though the looming autumn budget realities may check the pace of gains.

Here are some other reactions to the split BOJ decision from Wall Street traders:

NAKA MATSUZAWA, CHIEF MACRO STRATEGIST, NOMURA SECURITIES, TOKYO:

"It's (the yen's decline) a knee-jerk reaction to the two dissent votes. The bottom line is I think it's not too hard for the BOJ to keep the currency pricing for market expectations of rate hikes, basically every three months. And I do think that's what the BOJ wants to keep, not necessarily suggesting an October hike."

RAY ATTRILL, HEAD OF CURRENCY STRATEGY, NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK, SYDNEY:

"They've just clearly underwhelmed versus expectations here. And I think that one of the more staggering aspects of it ​was that they couldn't even get the unanimous vote for that. I think that really raised eyebrows in the market. (There was) nothing to put the market more firmly on the sense of another increase in Q4. It's clearly on Governor Ueda to put the market back more firmly on that stance. If he fails to do that, then I think dollar-yen is headed higher. It's hard ‌to believe that just on the back of one quarter-point the (US) Treasury Secretary is going to be jumping for joy and as willing to replicate what they did in August (by intervening). The risk here is that we're heading back up to 160."

BART WAKABAYASHI, BRANCH MANAGER, STATE STREET, TOKYO:

"They raise rates and the currency loses 100 points - I think the market is looking at the BOJ versus the G3 and G10 central banks and the interest rate spread is what is in play. I think it's important that the six-month cycle has been broken, and that leaves the market to say, hey, these guys are willing to act if they have to."But there is a factor where they need to keep up (with other central banks)...if (Ueda) is not as hawkish as the Fed (at the news conference), dollar/yen could really take off higher."

DAVID CHAO, GLOBAL MARKET STRATEGIST FOR ASIA-PACIFIC, INVESCO, SINGAPORE:

"The BOJ has finally shed its long-term status as a monetary policy outlier and is joining the ranks of the other major central banks. The market fully anticipated this rate hike, but it has to be taken in context with what's going on with ​the rest of the world. The BOJ, Fed and ECB have all hiked rates in the same month."

MASAHIKO LOO, SENIOR FIXED INCOME STRATEGIST, STATE STREET INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, TOKYO:

"Markets should focus less on the statement and more on Ueda's press conference. Expect a neutral-to-slightly hawkish tone, emphasizing that every meeting remains 'live' from here given resilient growth, persistent inflation risks and a policy rate (real yield) that remains accommodative even at 1.25%.More broadly, Japan is ​increasingly participating in a synchronized global tightening cycle. The debate is no longer whether the BOJ hikes, but how far rates ultimately go as major central banks continue to grapple with sticky inflation, AI-driven investment demand and rising term premium. Combined with higher domestic yields and growing confidence in the BOJ's normalization path, more capital is likely to ⁠stay in Japan rather than flow abroad. The bigger story remains that Japan is gradually ceasing to be a marginal buyer of foreign assets, not because it is selling aggressively, but because domestic alternatives are becoming more attractive."

CAROL KONG, CURRENCY STRATEGIST, COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, SYDNEY:

"The fact that two BOJ board members appointed by Takaichi opposed a hike today suggests the government still leans against BOJ rate hikes. This, together with the lack of guidance on the future pace of ​tightening in the statement, triggered a sell-off in the JPY. As usual, Governor Ueda’s post-meeting press conference will provide more insights into the rate outlook. The risk is Ueda fails to match markets’ hawkish expectations, fuelling further JPY weakness. We expect a follow-up hike in December."

YUGO TSUBOI, CHIEF STRATEGIST, DAIWA SECURITIES, TOKYO:

"Overall, the decision is likely to be seen as dovish. There had been some concern, albeit limited, about a 50-basis-point rate hike, but that did not happen. With two dissenting votes, markets likely ​took the view that it would be difficult to assume the pace of rate hikes will accelerate rapidly. U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent's negative comments on reflationary policy had also raised concerns about the potential economic damage from the BOJ becoming more hawkish than previously expected. Those concerns have receded, prompting a rise in stocks."

SHUN HONG LIU, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, HONG INVESTMENT ADVISORS, HONG KONG:

“Honestly, it is so hard to have a very strong view in this market, given things are so political everywhere else in the world. Just imagine Japan needing to get consent from the US for intervention—what can be done and what cannot be done will be coordinated by so many politicians. Last week, if you had asked me, I would have answered yes, it is the end of the yen carry trade (after the rate hike). But now I would answer no, as Takaichi confirms a 3.5% military spending target, while people suddenly believe that Warsh is an uber-hawk. So I just keep my eyes open and trade accordingly."

KANAKO NAKAMURA, ECONOMIST, DAIWA INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH, TOKYO:

"The expected dissent by two members suggests political pressure ​on the BOJ has not entirely faded. The reappointment of Minister Kiuchi in the cabinet reshuffle also signals continued support for expansionary fiscal policy, raising concerns that fiscal stimulus could add to inflation pressures."While the BOJ's statement showed readiness to address upside inflation risks, Governor Ueda's press conference will be key for assessing the future pace of rate hikes.With producer prices remaining elevated, oil prices rising on Middle East tensions, and a weak yen adding to inflation risks, we do ​not believe this rate hike alone will be sufficient. We expect the BOJ to accelerate rate hikes to roughly once a quarter."

PRASHANT NEWNAHA, SENIOR RATES STRATEGIST, TD SECURITIES, SINGAPORE:

"No real surprises from the BOJ decision to hike the target rate 25bps to 1.25%, and neither was the 7-2 split, with recent Takaichi appointees Sato and Asada voting against the hike. The statement retains most of the hawkish tone from the July Statement noting 'accommodative financial conditions are expected to be maintained' even after the hike, and the ‌Bank 'will continue to raise the policy ⁠interest rate'. The Bank reiterated its concerns that underlying inflation could deviate upwards from its 2% target, but we don’t see a smoking gun supporting a back to back hike in October. We stick with our call for rate hikes roughly every quarter with the next 25bps hike in December."

TOHRU SASAKI, CHIEF STRATEGIST, FUKUOKA FINANCIAL GROUP AND FORMER BOJ OFFICIAL, TOKYO:

"It's a little bit surprising to see that the yen weakened after the announcement. Maybe some market participants were expecting intervention like the last time before and after the BOJ's decision.Probably some were surprised because two members opposed the decision and maybe some were expecting some mention of a 50 basis point hike. It's a bit difficult to meet market expectations. Ueda-san has to be very hawkish to keep the yen from depreciating, but I think it's a bit difficult for him to be so hawkish. He has to say that the BOJ will probably hike the policy rate again within this year. But I think it's difficult for him to say, so the market will take it as a dovish press conference."

ANTHONY MALOUF, EBURY, SYDNEY:

"The seven-to-two vote is a touch wider than a clean hawkish consensus would suggest. Dissenters Asada Toichiro and Sato Ayano argued that inflation and growth have not accelerated enough to justify tightening now. The more telling split, though, sits elsewhere. Board members Takata Hajime and Tamura Naoki opposed the outlook language from the opposite direction, arguing underlying inflation has already reached a level consistent with ​the 2% target, which points to appetite for a faster pace rather than a slower one. The yen sold off ​after the decision. We interpret this as markets focusing on the two dissents, suggesting the board is ⁠less united behind a faster pace than the vote count alone implies, rather than doubting the hike itself. That fits our own view that the BOJ will deliver further hikes at a steady quarterly pace, with the next move in December and another in the first quarter of 2027, taking the policy rate to its neutral level near 1.75%."

KENTO MINAMI, SENIOR ECONOMIST AT DAIWA SECURITIES, TOKYO:

"The overall impression of the statement was dovish. BOJ’s new board members Ayano Sato and Toichiro Asada dissented from the decision. They were chosen by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, which suggests difficulties in raising rates in the future as the BOJ will have new board members going forward. "The statement indicated that the BOJ would raise rates at least ​once every six months, but this was in line with market expectations that the BOJ would raise rates every three months. These two dissenters were a dovish factor, which is why the yen started falling right after the decision."

MASATO KOIKE, SENIOR ECONOMIST, SOMPO INSTITUTE PLUS, TOKYO:

"I think the statement was hawkish, but markets had expected something ​even more hawkish, which is why the yen weakened after the announcement. "What ⁠struck me as hawkish was the explicit reference to accommodative financial conditions, and the wording that the BOJ will continue to adjust the degree of monetary easing. It also clearly mentioned upside risks. In addition, the BOJ cited a range of factors — not just crude oil, but price increases linked to AI-related demand, the weaker yen, and the mutually reinforcing mechanism between wages and prices. Those elements made the decision look hawkish overall. I don't think (Sato joining Asada in dissent) will have an impact when it comes to the pace of rate hikes being delayed. Sato's dissent was in line with expectations, but I see it as opposition to the timing or pace rather than a blanket objection to rate hikes. It did not come across as outright opposition, which I think is positive for the BOJ as it proceeds with further rate increases."

HIROFUMI SUZUKI, CHIEF FX STRATEGIST, SMBC, TOKYO:

"The rate hike itself was in line with market expectations, but the two dissenting votes came as a modest surprise, as only some market participants ⁠had anticipated them. The outcome has somewhat ​tempered expectations for further rate hikes and conveyed a dovish impression. The pace of future rate hikes is likely to depend primarily on the views of the BOJ's leadership. We therefore do not expect the pace to differ significantly from current market expectations.The yen initially weakened following the ​decision, but attention now turns to Governor Ueda's inflation outlook and policy stance at the press conference."

FRED NEUMANN, CHIEF ASIA ECONOMIST, HSBC, HONG KONG:

"The tone of the statement, along with two dissenters on the decision to raise rates, leaves lingering doubts that Japan’s central bank will be cautious in tightening monetary policy further. In addition, new inflation numbers out this morning for August showed that price pressures remained unchanged in August, rather than accelerate. All eyes are now on the press conference to be held by Governor Ueda, with the market looking for hawkish reassurances that the BOJ is prepared ​to raise rates again soon. While back-to-back hikes appear unlikely, investors will look for clues as to whether officials are prepared to raise interest rates again in December. Given that the Fed has tilted into a more hawkish direction, the pressure remains for the BOJ to follow suit: Governor Ueda will have to follow-up today's rate hike with by keeping the door open for another hike before the end of the year."

Sellside reactions aside, Governor Kazuo Ueda said that with the price trend very close to the bank’s 2% target, authorities now need to ensure inflation doesn’t overshoot.

“It has become important to stabilize the rate of price increases at a level of around 2%,” Ueda said in a post-decision briefing. “In that sense, I believe the phase of policy has shifted to a new stage.” The bank should act preemptively to avoid being forced into a situation where rapid hikes might become unavoidable, he added.

Traders also remained ​alert to the risk of intervention to prop up the currency after Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama said Tokyo won't hesitate to conduct further coordinated action, following a joint US-Japan move to boost the yen in late July.

The yen rallied sharply in early September to its highest since February as traders bet the BOJ ​would embark on multiple rate hikes, although those wagers came under question on Friday. 

The dollar rally against the yen helped the DXY dollar index climb 0.25% to 100.48, as broader currency markets remained focused on energy prices and the U.S. Federal Reserve. The index, which tracks the ​currency against six major peers, was ​up 1.4% for the week to ⁠around a six-week high after the US Federal Reserve hiked interest rates on Wednesday and signaled more increases could be coming.

Traders now see a roughly 55% chance of a quarter-point hike at the Fed's next ​two-day meeting next month, up from 27% a week ago, according to the CME Group's FedWatch ​tool.

Finally, it's worth noting that the BOJ dissenters directly jeopardized the plan of Steve Bessent for a stronger yen (and thus less fears of TSY selling to prop up the yen through intervention). According to Bloomberg, Warsh should "seriously consider a little Friday afternoon intervention to ensure that this bounce in USD/JPY makes a lower high than the prior ascent to just over 160."

Of course, the problem with constant meddling in market prices is the risk that the market tests you, forcing ever-more frequent action to keep things in line. At the very least anyone who stayed with the short-dollar trade has received a painful kick in the shin, which arguably will dissuade some punters from staying in the position the next time that the authorities step in. 

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 13:01

Chinese DRAM Giant Enters Booming Flash Memory Market To Take On Samsung, SanDisk

Zero Hedge -

Chinese DRAM Giant Enters Booming Flash Memory Market To Take On Samsung, SanDisk

Chinese chipmaking giant, CXMT, and the biggest IPO of the decade in the mainland market, is preparing to enter the booming flash memory ​chip market dominated by Samsung Electronics and other foreign rivals, Reuters reported citing sources, a move that would broaden ‌its customer base amid a global memory shortage.

The move would also pit the dynamic random access memory (DRAM) chip specialist against domestic rival YMTC, taking it into one of the semiconductor industry's fastest-growing segments.

The relentless, debt-fueled demand from AI servers (where ROI remains deeply negative) has created a global memory shortage that industry executives believe will persist through at least 2027. SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-jung said in July that 2027 ​could be the industry's worst year from a supply perspective, while TrendForce expects NAND supply tightness to ease only in the second half of next ​year, unless of course the bond market cracks first at which point all the hyperscalers will simply run out of money to buy massively overpriced DRAM and flash memory... which it will now that global yields are at decade highs. 

Manufacturers have also prioritized capital spending on DRAM and high-bandwidth memory, or HBM, limiting additions to NAND flash capacity, according to ⁠TrendForce, worsening shortages in this segment. DRAM provides the working memory used by processors, while NAND stores data in phones, computers and data centres. Both have seen costs explode in recent months, making memory the biggest cost driver of electronics purchases, with Goldman forecasting that memory prices will singlehandedly raise core PCE by 0.5%.

CXMT, also known as ChangXin ​Memory Technologies, plans to establish a research-and-development production line for NAND flash memory at its new plant in Beijing, according to the report; the company has ​also set up a research institute in the Chinese capital and projects there include NAND development, one source said.

CXMT has discussed its NAND plans with customers, including a newly established startup that intends to buy its NAND chips for storage products used in AI systems and supercomputers. 

Samsung was the world's biggest NAND supplier ‌by revenue ⁠in the second quarter with a 28% share, according to research firm Counterpoint. SK Hynix ranked second, followed by Micron. China's YMHT recently surpassed Sandisk, and is now tied with Japan's Kioxia for 4th spot in NAND marketshare. It will likely overtake Micron next quarter. 

CXMT and YMTC, known in China as the "twin stars" of the country's memory-chip industry, have largely operated in separate markets. CXMT dominates Chinese production of DRAM, while YMTC is the country's leading NAND manufacturer.

However, thanks to the biggest memory bubble in history, those lines have begun to blur. In April, Reuters reported that YMTC had sent low-power DRAM samples to customers as it weighed entry into CXMT's core market.

And now CXMT is entering the NAND market.

While ​the two firms lag behind larger international ​rivals and are more exposed to ⁠lower-priced products, they are growing at a blistering pace as tight supplies have strengthened their pricing power with some Chinese customers. In some cases, they have charged more than their foreign competitors, Reuters reported in July.

Both companies have emerged as key pillars of Beijing's drive to build a self-sufficient chip industry ​and close the gap in strategic technologies like AI. They grew with backing from China's national semiconductor fund and local ​governments. CXMT expanded with ⁠backing from Hefei, the provincial capital of Anhui province, in eastern China, while YMTC was built in Wuhan, the provincial capital of central Hubei province, reflecting competition among Chinese local governments to attract strategic industries through investment and incentives.

CXMT, which raised 57.92 billion yuan ($8.6 billion) in July in Asia's biggest initial public offering this year, plans a second memory-chip plant ⁠in Beijing and ​was in funding talks with a tech manufacturing hub backed by the local government, Reuters reported last ​month. YMTC's parent, CCSH, is also planning a Shanghai listing that aims to raise 33 billion yuan.

Washington's export restrictions have added urgency to China's drive to develop domestic memory suppliers. Washington placed YMTC on its Entity List ​in 2022 and later tightened China's access to HBM chips that are used alongside AI processors.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 12:40

"Good Manners" Have Never Been An Effective Strategy For Retaining Sovereignty

Zero Hedge -

"Good Manners" Have Never Been An Effective Strategy For Retaining Sovereignty

By Molly Schwartz, cross-asset macro strategist at Rabobank

10-year Treasury yields slid lower over yesterday’s session, retracing more than 9bps from Wednesday’s post-FOMC high of 5.02, with much of the move seemingly driven by falling oil prices, as Brent crude oil sank $3.5 to intraday lows below $102/bbl before retracing to $104/bbl. The UST yield curve has continued flattening, albeit in a bull-flattening fashion, as 2-year yields were dragged lower by almost 7bp. Given recent US economic data suggestive of a stronger-than-previously-thought labor market and hotter-than-preferred inflation, we maintain that the risk to our FOMC view of continued holds through year-end is skewed in favor of one hike this year, but believe that market-implied pricing of between one and two additional hikes in 2027 is unlikely (Read more about our FOMC view from Rabobank’s Fed whisperer, Philip Marey, here).

Politico reported yesterday that a trade deal is on the horizon between the US and Mexico, as some pointed to a recent call between Trump and Sheinbaum. An unnamed official said that “US-Mexico talks are active and continue to move in a positive direction…any notion that the call didn’t go well is wrong,” though “another person familiar with the call” referred to it as “so-so” and said that it “created a bit of noise.”

To those who have been following the trade negotiations between the US and Canada, this may feel uncomfortably similar to the days before the US-Canada trade relationship deteriorated completely in late August. However, Mexico already seems far better positioned to emerge with a favorable trade deal, simply by avoiding the headlines. While USD/MXN has recently been trading above the 17 level, we believe that trade progress remains constructive for the MXN and see continued resilience.

But the relationship between the US and Canada is only eroding further. Trump recently signed a Presidential Memorandum to “identify and take steps in response to Canada’s measures that have denied US firms access to Canada’s federal and provincial procurement markets.” This comes as Carney spoke to the EU Parliament in Strasbourg yesterday, further clarifying his position on where he sees middle powers fitting in an increasingly bifurcated world. He said that he is “not proposing a third bloc in order to become a great power rival, only with better manners…we are pursuing resilience so that no one, no one, can control our open markets, impair our sovereignty, threaten our territorial integrity, or undermine our freedoms.”

It should be noted that good manners have never been proven to be an effective strategy for retaining sovereignty. Carney also clarified that Canada is not seeking to become a “full member” of the European Union, while Canada’s EU ambassador-designate, Jonathan Wilkinson, asserted that Canada wants to “get as close as [it] possibly can to the EU without giving up significant chunks of sovereignty.”

Speaking of non-EU members, the Bank of England announced its decision to hold Bank Rate unchanged at 3.75% in a 6-3 vote. Rabobank’s BoE whisperer, Stefan Koopman, highlights in a Bank of England Comment that there is a case for the Bank to tighten borrowing conditions further, suggesting that November is a live meeting. Rabobank is forecasting a 25bp hike at the November meeting, assuming that the Autumn Budget is well absorbed. (Read more here).

* * *

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 12:20

South Korean President Announces No Military Support To US Hormuz Mission

Zero Hedge -

South Korean President Announces No Military Support To US Hormuz Mission

South Korea has belatedly made a big decision after starting months ago it found itself among key Washington allies directly called upon by President Trump to provide urgent security help for Strait of Hormuz energy transit, amid the war with Iran.

President Lee Jae Myung has on Friday announced he will ⁠not deploy the military to the ⁠Middle East, though his statement also suggested troops could play a role on the peripheries of the conflict.

August 2025: President Trump meets with South Korean President Lee Jae Myung at the Oval Office, Reuters.

Resisting direct calls from Trump to support the campaign against Iran, Lee made clear to a news conference: "There won’t be deployment that would involve or enter war. I can tell you that very clearly. We won’t deploy military assets in any form to that end."

"It is also clear that we must do the minimum as other countries do to ​protect our commercial shipping and crude shipments, and also the safety of ‌our people," he said. At the moment, the South Korean Navy only conducts patrols off the coast of Somali as part of international anti-piracy efforts.

Lee's words did seem to leave open a potential greater future role in terms of South Korea safeguarding global shipping in the region, but it would obviously be significantly away from the potential reach of any Iranian missile or drones, or that of their proxies.

This is a long-awaited decision. While Europe and basically the whole rest of the world has rejected Trump calls to send military assets to assist in opening the Strait of Hormuz, South Korea is in a tougher spot given the many decades-long, large American troop presence on the peninsula, safeguarding the south from possible attack from North Korea. The country is also effectively under America's nuclear protection umbrella. 

Last week, Lee's press secretary stated the government had not yet finalized its policy but was "cautiously assessing it".

But then it got a warning from Tehran. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baqaei warned on X on Sept.7. "The military presence or operational participation of other nations in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz would inevitably be viewed as direct support for the party committing acts of aggression, and would lead to serious consequences."

And so Seoul has found itself diplomatically between a rock and a hard place:

Trump has criticized Seoul for what he called insufficient support for the Iran war and scaled back major joint military drills by the two countries’ armed forces this summer, a move that unsettled the U.S. ally.

Committing South Korean troops to the Gulf region has also seemed unpopular among the Korean populace. Rare anti-war protests have been going strong this month in front of the US Embassy in Seoul.

Locals have at times carried signs that read "Do Not Join a War of Aggression" and "No Military Deployment to Hormuz," while protesters have chanted, "We cannot send our young people into a sea of death," according to prior descriptions by the AFP.

Not going to appease Washington: "the minimum necessary activities"...

"Sending our troops to an illegal war waged by the United States is unacceptable," Choi Young-ok, a member of Korean Peace Solidarity for Sovereignty and Reunification, a group that is highly critical of the US military presence in South Korea, told AFP.

"There is no reason for us to send troops when no other country has done so or said it would," added Choi, who also warned that sending South Korean troops would "inevitably lead to casualties." Now, Seoul is nervously awaiting Trump's reaction and coming wrath.

* * *

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 11:20

AfD Preps Talks With Moscow To Reopen Cheap Gas Flows To Germany

Zero Hedge -

AfD Preps Talks With Moscow To Reopen Cheap Gas Flows To Germany

It didn't take long for the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party - fresh off its historic taking of 43.8% of the vote in the eastern German state of Saxony-Anhalt election earlier this month which left Chancellor Friedrich Merz and his Christian Democratic Union (CDU) shaken - to embark on ties which are a serious shot across the bow and slap in the face to both Berlin and Brussels.

Reuters is on Friday reporting that AfD leadership is preparing for possible talks with President Putin and his economic envoy and top negotiator Kirill Dmitriev focused on restoring Russian gas supplies to Germany.

via Reuters

The meeting could take place next year, as early as March 2027, and would be spearheaded by AfD co-leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla.

This is precisely what German voters supported in the regional election, and the AfD made no secret of its plans to seek turning the Russian energy tap back on. Weidel made clear in a June interview, "Cheap energy from Russia was the secret of the success of 'Made in Germany'. We need it back." 

"The loss of this energy has set us back years. Hundreds of thousands of jobs have been lost," the AfD co-leader said at the time. "It has made us dependent on ​the United States, which sells us energy at far higher prices."

Russia had prior to the start of the Ukraine war supplied over half of Germany's natural gas, alongside more than a third of the country's crude oil imports.

Russian natgas to Germany was halted in stages, in tandem with the major Nord Stream bombings and investigation, as Berlin eventually found alternative suppliers like Norway, the Netherlands and increased its reliance on LNG imports.

Many Germans have been sick and tired of seeing daily living prices go up while resources and untold billions are siphoned off for the Zelensky government in the Ukraine war.

Getty Images

While nothing has yet to be officially announced or confirmed by the Russian side or through any AfD official statement, Reuters points to a key caveat based on its sources: "The meeting would only happen if a peace framework was agreed first between Russia and Ukraine, ​and the organisers hoped it would bring together the AfD, Russia and the United States, the person said. Possible locations for the summit included ⁠Israel, the United Arab Emirates or India, they added," the report says.

Earlier, we featured commentary by Andrew Korybko which seeks to summarize the mood in both Moscow and among the 'hard-rightward' turning German streets:

Finally, the economic errors concern the EU's sanctions on Russian energy, which led to the bloc replacing inexpensive long-term gas contracts with Russia with expensive market-priced imports from elsewhere. Prices are now nearly ten times higher than before and "may well rise even further." Putin also criticized the EU's gas storage policies for being "unconcerned with the technical condition of these storage facilities and the physical volumes involved." All of this adversely affects the EU's economy.

All in all, Putin is arguing that the AfD's rise is an electoral revolt against these policies, all of which center on Russia. This doesn't mean that the party or its supporters are "pro-Russian", let alone "Russian puppets", just that they understand the importance of pragmatic ties with Russia for their country's political interests, security, and economic development. Obsessive anti-Russian fearmongering, risking World War III over Ukraine, and dumping inexpensive Russian energy haven't helped Germany at all.

"Bests interests for Germany" being prioritized, where energy supplies "are cheapest, namely from Russia"...

As a reminder, there were already some deeply provocative diplomatic AfD moves back in June, with AfD foreign-policy spokesman Markus Frohnmaier having traveled to St. Petersburg to meet with Dmitriev and Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller, urging the reopening of the Nord Stream pipeline.

* * *

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 10:45

The Purge: Princeton Faculty Reach Perfect Zero Support For Republicans

Zero Hedge -

The Purge: Princeton Faculty Reach Perfect Zero Support For Republicans

Authored by Jonathan Turley via JonathanTurley.org,

We recently discussed how Yale faculty reached academic nirvana after years of purging departments of conservatives and Republicans. The university finally showed zero political donations to Republicans. Now Princeton can claim that it has succeeded in a similar cleansing, according to a new study by Princetonians for Free Speech (PFS). The study shows that 98% of political donations went to Democrats or Democrat-affiliated groups and 0% went to Republicans or affiliated groups.

Political contributions are one measure that helps gauge the degree of ideological orthodoxy and intolerance in higher education. While some academics simply do not make contributions and may still hold conservative views, the study still offers another insight into the political preferences of those who do make such contributions. The study does not mean that we can assume that the number of academics with conservative or libertarian values is zero. (There are obvious outliers such as Robby George). However, few would dispute that it reaffirms the extreme imbalance of ideological views at this and other universities.

Professors often express shock at the thought that there would be any political or ideological litmus test for hiring. I have also opposed such measures. However, the hypocrisy is crushing. Today's faculty are responsible for a near-complete ideological purging of their ranks. They have created a hostile environment for anyone with conservative or libertarian viewpoints, including students who rarely have the opportunity to hear from a professor from a center-right perspective at most schools.

Most recently, forty percent of college faculty admitted that they would vote against any Trump supporter seeking an academic position regardless of their scholarship or teaching ability. Keep in mind that this is only the professors willing to admit to such bias.

Some are more open than others.

I had dinner with a Harvard Law Professor, who expressed disbelief that I expected him to vote for any faculty applicants who held views he considered wrong. When I noted that I regularly vote for faculty candidates who hold opposing views, he just shrugged and said that, if he rejects their views, he cannot vote for those views to be taught to students.

There are few remaining conservatives or libertarians on law school faculties, which have been purged of dissenting voices through a biased hiring and promotion system. Despite years of complaints and declining public trust in higher education, faculty members continue to reinforce bias and orthodoxy in our schools.

I wrote about the rise of this new McCarthyism on the left seven years ago.

Recently, I discussed the example of Fordham University School of Law professor John Pfaff, who called for "repercussions" for professors who do not "recant" their view that the 14th Amendment does not protect birthright citizenship.

Not long ago, I debated Professor Randall Kennedy at Harvard Law School about the school's lack of ideological diversity. I respect Kennedy, and I do not view him as anti-free speech or intolerant. Yet when I noted the statistics on the vanishing number of conservative students and faculty in comparison to the nation, Kennedy responded that Harvard "is an elite university" and does not have to "look like America."

Of course, the problem is that Harvard does not even look like Massachusetts, which is nearly 30 percent Republican.

At schools like Yale and Princeton, they have achieved near 100% for Democrats (with only a couple of percent going for independent or socialist causes). Yet, if you ask faculty about the purging of their ranks, they will often shrug and say that they just cannot find a conservative or libertarian who is intellectually worthy of an appointment to their schools. It was the same absurd rationalization that was once used to justify not hiring minorities or women.

I just had a debate with a William & Mary law professor who admitted there is no other rational explanation for the virtual absence of conservatives and libertarians than systemic bias. Indeed, if a company were to go to court to say that there was nothing intentional in a virtual absence of minority employees, it would be laughed out of court.

Of course, nothing is laughable about the state of higher education. This generation of administrators and faculty are destroying our educational institutions because they cannot set aside their political bias and intolerance for the benefit of their schools. Higher education has reached record lows in public trust. Yet, these professors and deans are insulated from such public opinion. They are often financially insulated from the economic impact of such isolation. In higher education, the echo chamber works to their personal benefit, increasing their opportunities for writing and conferences. They also do not face opposing views of their scholarship or viewpoints.

Recently, I participated in a debate with the President of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP). He doubled down on his call for universities to pursue more political agendas and activism. AAUP later broke its long-standing apolitical tradition and endorsed Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan.

This is why I have advised university presidents who want to restore intellectual diversity that they cannot rely on faculty members. With enough donor and faculty pressure, deans may add a single conservative, but they have shown they are unwilling to make real changes to the academic echo chamber they have created.

In the same way, I have encouraged state legislatures to tie further public subsidies to real and substantial changes in creating intellectual diversity among faculty.

If we are to protect these bastions of free speech, legislatures will need to play a more active role in addressing the exclusion of both faculty candidates and speakers on public campuses. Too many faculty members still take the view that citizens are a captive audience expected to keep funding their departments, while excluding conservative or dissenting views held by many, if not most, citizens in a given state.

If faculty members want to maintain echo chambers for their own viewpoints, they should seek private donors to sustain such intolerance and orthodoxy.

Legislatures can demand evidence that schools maintain intellectually diverse faculty when determining the level of continued support from citizens. Otherwise, it is ridiculous to expect the public to subsidize their ideological echo chambers of faculty.

For schools like Princeton, donors clearly do not want or expect intellectual diversity. They keep donating to a school that has systematically purged its ranks and now runs from the left to the far left.

As these surveys confirm what we already know about the intellectual intolerance of today's faculty and administrators, they can at least spare us the performative denials. They should embrace their bias and dogmatism. Own it. This is what they have built through years of ideological agendas and intolerance.

After all, how many academic institutions can claim true perfection? Princeton is effectively a closed shop for Republicans. "Rah rah rah Tiger, tiger, tiger / Sis, sis, sis / Boom, boom, boom, ah! / Princeton! Princeton! Princeton!"

Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the best-selling author of "Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution."

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 10:25

She Saw the Flock Story Coming…

The Big Picture -

Note: This guest essay was written by someone who works for a regulated entity and is not authorized to speak publicly on corporate or market issues. They have been closely following the evolution of the mass surveillance situation since early 2025. 

 

Why Jessica Burbank’s Flock investigation deserved consideration for an Investigative Documentary Emmy

There are two ways for an investigative journalist to be first. One is to publish a story before another reporter does. The rarer kind is to recognize that something is an important story before everyone else sees its importance.

Jessica Burbank did the latter.

In August 2025, Burbank produced an hour-long documentary investigating Flock Safety, the rapidly expanding provider of automated license-plate readers and other surveillance technology. Her starting point was hardly the stuff of national headlines: a municipal contract in the affluent village of Scarsdale, New York.

What Burbank found there became a window into something much larger.

That matters because the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences has an Emmy category almost tailor-made for this kind of work. NATAS describes Outstanding Investigative Documentary as films that expose “wrongdoing, corruption or hidden truths through deep reporting and original access.”

In other words, work that holds powerful institutions accountable and brings new evidence or revelations to light. Measured against that standard, Burbank deserved serious consideration for an Emmy.

On April 8, 2025, Scarsdale’s Village Board approved its Flock contract. The resolution had not appeared on the published agenda. After a presentation and executive session, the Board amended its agenda and approved the contract 6–1. The procedural portion took mere seconds.

Burbank’s documentary reconstructs what preceded that vote and what residents hadn’t been told.

Using records obtained under New York’s Freedom of Information Law, she established that Village officials had been communicating with Flock for months before the public presentation. The incoming police chief was invited to meet with the company the day after his selection and before formally taking office. On March 31, he emailed that “the map is approved,” referring to proposed camera locations—before the public presentation, contract approval, or funding.

That alone is solid accountability journalism.

But Burbank didn’t stop there.

A records request seeking market research and analysis of competing vendors produced only a sole-source justification signed by Flock’s CEO. Burbank searched elsewhere and found versions of similar Flock documents in government records around the country. She then identified communities where Flock contracts had followed strikingly similar low-visibility paths.

In Lucas County, Ohio, commissioners approved a $250,000 Flock agreement among a group of routine items, only to attempt to rescind it a week later after a commissioner reconsidered what they had authorized.

This is the machinery of investigative journalism: find an anomaly, obtain the records, test the official explanation, search for a pattern, and confront the subject with what you find.

Burbank did that last part, too. She interviewed Flock’s national communications director and questioned the company about its contracting practices and the similarities she had uncovered among municipalities. The film does not simply present critics of Flock; it puts Burbank’s findings directly to Flock and gives the company an opportunity to answer them.

Then the investigation makes its most important leap.

Scarsdale isn’t really the story. The network is.

The documentary explains that Flock’s distinguishing feature isn’t simply its cameras. It is the ability, where agencies participate in sharing, to connect searches across jurisdictions. Burbank examines a Texas sheriff’s investigation involving a woman who traveled across state lines for an abortion and gets Flock itself to acknowledge that searching cameras in other participating localities is a capability of its system.

From there emerges the film’s central insight: a national surveillance infrastructure doesn’t necessarily arise from an act of Congress or a presidential directive. It can emerge incrementally—one police department, one salesperson, one municipal contract and sometimes one barely noticed local vote at a time.

As Burbank puts it near the film’s conclusion, one might imagine that creation of a national camera network would require “high-profile debate on the nightly news” and congressional action. Instead, she observes, it can take little more than seconds at a town-board meeting and a police chief’s signature.

That observation looks considerably more important today than it did when Burbank made it.

There was also unusually immediate evidence of impact. Her written investigation was published August 2, 2025. On August 4, Scarsdale’s police chief sent the Village Board a memorandum concerning the Flock contract. On August 6, the Village canceled it. Burbank carefully stops short of claiming that her reporting caused the reversal, suggesting instead that journalism and sustained public participation “might” have mattered.

That restraint is important. Investigative journalism should establish what the evidence supports, not claim credit it cannot prove.

But the strongest argument for Burbank’s work may be one that only became fully visible afterward. She was early. The national controversy she identified in 2025 did not fade. It grew.

Flock and interconnected ALPR networks subsequently became subjects of far broader scrutiny over privacy, immigration enforcement, abortion investigations, police misuse and the extraordinary power created when thousands of local cameras become searchable beyond the communities that purchased them.

In other words, Burbank didn’t simply get to the Flock story early. She identified why it was going to become a national story. That distinction matters.

There are investigations that expose misconduct everyone already understands to be important. They can be extraordinary journalism. But there is another, rarer form of investigative reporting: finding something that appears small, recognizing the system concealed inside it and showing the audience why it will matter before conventional wisdom catches up.

Burbank began with a 37-second vote in a suburban village and found the architecture of a national controversy.

Her documentary ends with a sentence that now sounds remarkably prescient:

“The story of mass surveillance and Flock Safety is one I’m just beginning to tell.”

She was right.

None of this means Burbank was owed an Emmy. NATAS’s documentary categories encompass extraordinary work from some of the best-resourced documentary organizations in the world, and an independent production should be judged by the same standard of excellence.

But that is precisely why Burbank’s accomplishment deserves attention. NATAS says an Outstanding Investigative Documentary should uncover hidden truths through deep reporting and original access, hold powerful actors accountable, and bring new evidence or revelations to light.

Burbank did those things.

And she did one more: she recognized the significance of the story before much of the country did. That isn’t merely good timing. It’s one of the hallmarks of great investigative journalism.

 

 

Sources:
Video: You’re Being Watched: The Company Behind America’s Mass Surveillance Takeover

Millions in Public Funds, Zero Public Input: Flock’s Surveillance System Might Already Be Overseeing Your Community
The $7.5 billion surveillance company Flock Safety is operating in 49 states and over 5,000 communities, but the residents of Scarsdale, NY, are fighting back.
Jessica Burbank
Dropsite. Aug 02, 2025

 

 

The post She Saw the Flock Story Coming… appeared first on The Big Picture.

Treasury Sanctions Crypto Exchange Behind Iran's Bitcoin Tolls On Hormuz Ships

Zero Hedge -

Treasury Sanctions Crypto Exchange Behind Iran's Bitcoin Tolls On Hormuz Ships

Via Decrypt.co,

The U.S. Treasury has sanctioned BitBank, naming the Iranian exchange it says carried the Bitcoin that shipping companies paid for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

Since June, the Office of Foreign Assets Control said, the Hormuz Safe Marine Services Authority has used BitBank to pass the payments it collects on to the Iranian regime. That authority was the body charging vessels in Bitcoin for transit rights, a scheme Treasury designated in July.

Between June and July, Treasury says, BitBank was used to move "hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of Bitcoin" to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

BitBank is controlled by Babak Zanjani, an Iranian financier OFAC designated in January. Sentenced to death in Iran in 2016 for embezzling from the National Iranian Oil Company, he had his sentence commuted in 2024 and resurfaced last year backing regime-linked ventures. Treasury says he has been advertising BitBank on his social media accounts since at least 2024.

Four more designations

The action also covers Pishtaz Simorgh Electronic Trade Company, which built BitBank's software and is a subsidiary of the already-designated Dot One Value Creation Group, along with three Dot One executives: Hossein Ali Zaker Hossein, Mohammad Mahdi Zaker Hossein and Seyed Adel Heidari.

Treasury describes the first as involved in most of Zanjani's sanctions evasion, including oil exports, and says he has brokered digital asset transactions that ended up with the IRGC.

All five were designated under Executive Order 13902, which the administration extended in August to cover anyone operating in Iran's digital asset sector. It is the authority Treasury has been using since to work through the network, including the crypto exchanges it designated for laundering Iranian funds.

"Efforts to finance the Iranian regime using cryptocurrencies are not beyond OFAC's reach," said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

"If you support the Iranian regime, the Department of the Treasury will sanction you."

The designations fall under Operation Economic Outcast, the campaign Bessent announced on August 24 and dubbed Economic D-Day, which Treasury says is aimed at severing Iran's remaining economic lifelines with help from the EU, the UK and Gulf partners.

U.S. assets belonging to the five are blocked, as are any entities they own half or more of, and non-U.S. firms dealing with them risk secondary sanctions.

Traders do not expect the pressure to lift soon. On Myriad, a prediction market developed by Decrypt's parent company Dastan, the odds of Washington announcing an end to its naval blockade of Iranian shipping by September 30 have fallen to 10%, down 30 points. Even a December 31 deadline is only a 60% shot.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/18/2026 - 09:40

Pages