Zero Hedge

Hamas Says Tony Blair Not Welcome In Gaza Following Ceasefire

Hamas Says Tony Blair Not Welcome In Gaza Following Ceasefire

Via Middle East Eye

Hamas has warned that Tony Blair would not be welcome in any role in governing Gaza following the commencement of a ceasefire in the enclave. Speaking to Sky News, senior Hamas official Basem Naim said he welcomed US President Donald Trump's involvement in bringing about an end to the two-year war.

However, he said that there could be no role for the former British prime minister in the governance of Gaza, despite Trump's previously announced support for Blair's involvement. "When it comes to Tony Blair, unfortunately, we Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims, and maybe others around the world have bad memories of him," Naim said. "We can still remember his role in killing, causing thousands or millions of deaths to innocent civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq."

As official envoy for the Middle East Quartet (US, Russia, European Union and UN) between 2007 and 2015, Blair was also previously tasked with attempting to bring about a solution to the Palestine-Israel question, something he was unable to achieve.

Last month, various media outlets reported that Blair was in discussions to lead a transitional authority in the Gaza Strip as part of a US-backed plan for post-war governance. The plan would establish a transitional authority in Gaza for up to five years, excluding both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority.

Under the reported proposal, the authority would hold "supreme political and legal authority" over Gaza during the interim period. Hamas has rejected the involvement of Blair in governing Gaza, citing in part his previous failures in the region.

Thousands of Palestinians began returning to northern Gaza on Friday after a ceasefire took effect, following Israel and Hamas's approval of a deal to "end the war" and exchange prisoners.

The Israeli military said the ceasefire officially began at 12pm local time (9am GMT) after the completion of its withdrawal to agreed-upon lines of the first phase. There was no immediate comment from Hamas. The Israeli government ratified the agreement on Friday morning, just hours after Hamas announced that a deal had been reached.

Israel's public broadcaster, Kan, on Thursday published a leaked copy of the agreement's first phase signed in Egypt, which states that the war would "immediately end" once approved by Israel.

Trump is expected to visit Egypt over the weekend to attend an official signing ceremony, followed by a visit to Israel on Monday

On Thursday, Hamas chief negotiator Khalil al-Hayya confirmed that the Palestinian movement had also approved the agreement to end the war. He added that the United States and other mediators had provided guarantees that the signing of the deal would mean the war "has ended indefinitely".

However, Israeli air strikes, artillery fire and gunfire were reported in Gaza City and Khan Younis on Friday morning. No injuries were reported.

Israeli forces also carried out bombings in Gaza on Thursday, after mediators announced a deal had been reached, killing at least eight Palestinians.

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 19:50

Anduril Founder Urges Rapid Reindustrialization As U.S. Defense Supply Chain Remains Alarmingly Reliant On China

Anduril Founder Urges Rapid Reindustrialization As U.S. Defense Supply Chain Remains Alarmingly Reliant On China

China's latest decision to expand rare earth export controls, adding holmium, erbium, thulium, europium, and ytterbium to the restricted list just days ago, serves as yet another wake-up call for the Trump administration and Washignton as a whole. The U.S. remains dangerously dependent on China, the world's largest producer of rare earths, for these critical minerals that are essential inputs into the manufacturing of drones, humanoid robots, EVs, and advanced weaponry. 

Anduril Industries founder Palmer Luckey sat down with Bloomberg on Friday to discuss how America's defense supply chains are dangerously reliant on China. He said the U.S. must urgently "reindustrialize" and rebuild its capacity to produce rare earths, semiconductors, and advanced computing hardware domestically if it wants to survive the 2030s. 

"I mean, the reality is that our interests are relatively divergent at this point," Luckey said, referencing President Trump's late tariff threats (read here) against Being. "We need to make our own chips, our own computers, our own products downstream. China has a lot of leverage right now, and that makes it very hard to negotiate. They do have a lot of leverage right now, and so it's very hard to make deals with them. I think it's actually healthy for the US-China relationship for it not to be so dependent on China right now."

Luckey noted that Anduril, one of the fastest-growing defense technology startups in the U.S, has been heavily sanctioned by China, forcing it to eliminate all supply chain exposure in China. 

"Remember that we are sanctioned by China. Remember that our executives are personally sanctioned by China. And so we have we can't we're not doing this for you to leverage or negotiating reasons. We have to get off of the Chinese supply chain and not just things that are literally made in China, but even things that are dependent on China," he said. 

Given that China holds considerable leverage in the ongoing trade war, there's an ongoing risk that Beijing could abruptly sanction a major U.S. defense contractor, triggering supply chain disruptions for critical weapons, such as advanced, man-portable, anti-tank guided missile systems. Such an event could prove devastating for America's global military posturing and its active operations around the world that depend on these defense systems.

"It's the broader economy and maybe some other defense companies, if you can believe it, there's lots of us defense companies that haven't been sanctioned by China and therefore they haven't had the foresight to go and build it," Luckey said. 

However, there is some good news: The Trump administration recently created another mining juggernaut, this time with mining projects in Alaska run by Trilogy Metals, and followed its new stake in Lithium Americas Corp., which is developing the Thacker Pass lithium project in Nevada. In July, the U.S. Defense Department agreed to a $400 million equity investment in MP Materials Corp. to fund a plant for rare-earth magnets. It is expected to do the same with USA Resources. 

There's certainly a race against time to secure supply chains before 2030

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 19:15

Purge Politics: Jeffries Pledges Legal Retaliation When Democrats Take Power

Purge Politics: Jeffries Pledges Legal Retaliation When Democrats Take Power

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

On MSNBC’s “All In,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) doubled down on his pledge of legal retaliation against Trump officials and associates if Democrats retake power. 

He noted that Trump “sycophants” in the Department of Justice do not have immunity and will be pursued. The statement comes after the indictment of Letitia James for mortgage fraud. The statement suggests that the country could be in store for waves of purge politics in which parties fire or prosecute officials from the prior administration.

The comments come after the charging of Letitia James for mortgage fraud, a move widely viewed as retaliation for her own lawfare record.

On the program, Jeffries was asked about his prior threats of tit-for-tat actions against Trump supporters or enablers.

Host Chris Hayes noted:

“You put a statement out in response to the news of Tish James’s indictment, in which you said, among other things, that those sycophants who aid and abet the president’s schemes will not be able to hide from serious legal consequences of their behavior. They will be held accountable. What do you mean by that?”

Jeffries responded that

“there are so many different corrupt sycophants within the Trump administration, including, but not limited to within the Department of Justice. Now, these people don’t have immunity. And the reality is the statute of limitations is five years, and there will be accountability with the next administration, if not before, when Democrats take back control of the House of Representatives.”

In the meantime, James is claiming victim status in the indictment despite being lawfare’s happiest warrior, who ran on a pledge to nail Trump if elected (without bothering to specify what that crime or offense might be).

James is declaring, “I am fearless.” She is also shameless.

I have been critical of some of these cases, which followed a social media posting in which Trump chastised the Justice Department for not indicting a list of political opponents. Within days, Comey and James were indicted. That posting will feature prominently in the challenges to be filed for vindictive prosecution by both defendants. James is likely to raise the resignation of former acting U.S. Attorney Eric Siebert, who reportedly was forced out after objecting to the basis for indicting James.

Jeffries’ pledge suggests that cycles of purge politics are likely to continue unabated in this country.

*  *  * New Deal: We want you to check out Ultra Testosterone Booster, so here's some for free with Male Enhancement...

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 18:40

San Fran Leftists Triggered As Tech Billionaire Calls For National Guard Troops

San Fran Leftists Triggered As Tech Billionaire Calls For National Guard Troops

A long-left-leaning billionaire philanthropist has triggered San Francisco politicians by praising President Trump's performance in office -- and even more so by urging Trump to deploy National Guard soldiers to suppress the city's rampant criminality.

"I fully support the president," said Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff in an interview with the New York Times. "I think he’s doing a great job." That puts Benioff at stark odds with his fellow San Franciscans: In a June Public Policy Institute of California poll, 77% of Bay Area residents disapproved of Trump's performance. Benioff recounted his recent honor of sitting across a table from Trump at a state dinner hosted by King Charles at Windsor Castle, and said he used the dinner to tell Trump “how grateful I am for everything he’s doing.”

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff (right) is godfather to one of California Gov. Gavin Newsom's children (Bloomberg/Getty via Los Angeles Times)

The Times notes that Benioff, a major benefactor of San Francisco, has leaned toward the left side of the spectrum -- for example, urging other business leaders to help the homeless rather than gripe about their existence. Now, however, as homeless, drugged-out criminals are destroying San Francisco, he's ready for soldiers and Humvees to pour into the city he says is woefully under-policed -- figuring it needs another 1,000 cops on top of the 1,500 that are currently on the force. 

The situation has compelled Benioff to take matters into his own hands, where his upcoming Dreamforce conference is concerned: He's hiring hundreds of off-duty cops to secure the area around the San Francisco convention area. “You’ll see. When you walk through San Francisco next week, there will be cops on every corner,” Benioff said. “That’s how it used to be.” Until the city's police force is beefed up, Benioff endorses the use of National Guard soldiers. “We don’t have enough cops, so if they can be cops, I’m all for it,” he said. 

State Sen. Scott Wiener says San Francisco doesn't need "an illegal military occupation," but this photo of him seems to argue otherwise (Wiener Instagram)

That's a particularly interesting stance, given Benioff is close friends with California Gov. Gavin Newsom -- so close, in fact, that Benioff is a godfather to one of the Newsom's children. As Benioff endorses Trump deployment of National Guard troops to San Francisco, Newsom is suing the Trump administration over the deployment of Guard soldiers to Los Angeles. Benioff's left-leaning resume also includes his hosting of a major 2016 fundraiser for Hillary Clinton at his $31 million mansion alongside the Presidio, and his personal bankrolling of a city ballot measure to raise taxes on businesses to fund welfare for the homeless.  

"This is a slap in the face to San Francisco," Matt Dorsey, a member of the city's Board of Supervisors, wrote on X. "It’s insulting to our cops, and it’s honestly galling to those of us who’ve been fighting hard over the last few years to fully staff our [police department]...We don't NEED the National Guard here." State Sen. Scott Wiener, who's best known for pushing the LGBTQ agenda, chimed in, saying "We neither need nor want an illegal military occupation in San Francisco.” Assemblyman Matt Haney decried Benioff's "support [of] a direct assault and occupation of our city," while the Times described San Francisco DA Brooke Jenkins as "livid" over Benioff's stance on troops. 

It's safe to say a Benioff aide anticipated the backlash: The Times story about the phone interview with him aboard his private plane concludes in amusing fashion: 

At the end of the interview, he turned to a public relations executive. He could be heard asking why her mouth was wide open and if he had said anything he shouldn’t have. “What about the political questions?” he asked. “Too spicy?” Then he hung up. 

In August, Trump teased the possibility of sending troops to San Francisco, telling reporters in the Oval Office, “You look at what the Democrats have done to San Francisco — they’ve destroyed it...we’ll clean that one up, too.”

*  *  * We have two new Reverse Osmosis water filters for you to check out...

Cheap and convenientCountertop Reverse Osmosis Filter (great in campers) with UV sterilization

1200 Gallon / Day Workhorse: High-Flow Alkalizing (Ph 7.5) Reverse Osmosis with 11-stage filtration & faucet. Comes with extra filters for 2-year supply

Intro Sale // Free Shipping // Both have great Amazon reviews

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 18:05

No Crying In The Casino

No Crying In The Casino

Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance

Browsing social media last night and this morning, I was greeted with dozens of examples of people posting their “loss porn,” as the Reddit traders would call it, with one P/L after another showing huge losses.

Some traders posted ominous things about blowing up their crypto accounts, forced liquidations, and massive losses. Some even also posted, insinuating they were considering self-harm. I posted some examples on my blog here.

Let’s assume half of these posts are people joking around, and the other half are dead serious. That would be alarming. And so, this weekend is a good time to remember a couple important lessons.

First is the fact that things can change any day in the market without notice—as I have been saying for years and explained in my comprehensive wrap-up yesterday after the market closed: The Columbus Day Massacre: My Thoughts

If you’ve been spending the last five years patting yourself on the back over what a genius you are because you have minted it in cryptocurrencies or equities that are trading at 10,000x sales with no net income, perhaps you should reconsider taking to the public forum to air your grievances with how you’ve managed your capital on one particular day.

If you’ve spent the last decade shit-posting seasoned investors like Jim Chanos or Peter Schiff on Twitter and just can’t figure out why they can’t see things your way because you’ve always been right, now would be a good place to see if any of their skepticism or warnings about markets can make their way through your blood-brain barrier.

If you got smacked around on Friday but didn’t take a total loss, turn a shitty day into an asset by starting to tell yourself the honest truth—you don’t know everything, and none of us do—instead of whatever lie you’ve been telling yourself about how you’re going to be able to outperform forever because you happen to have caught the tail end of a nominal hyperinflationary boom that could very well end in the United States dollar dying while your ego portion of your brain was still mushy and developing, like an infant’s skull.

"From time to time, everybody goes bust..."

It’s a great weekend to ask yourself, “Am I quickly disregarding fraud warnings about a company issued by a man who teaches a class on fraud at Yale and who called Enron’s collapse ahead of time?”

Or, “Am I quick to ridicule someone’s stance on Bitcoin or gold, despite the fact they’ve been in the game for decades and have amassed enormous personal wealth and one of the best grasps of free-market economics out of anybody in finance today?”

If the answer is yes to either of these, maybe it’s time to act a little less like a hyena and a little more like an adult. Buck up. Act like you’ve been here before. Take the pain. Learn from the pain. Come back better.

After all, the stock market is an adult game with real wins and real losses.

Third, assuming that half of posts like these are real it’s stunning to see, after simply one 3% drawdown in the market—after we have done nothing but rage to all-time highs nonstop since the market plunge in April.

It is proof positive that investors have been seduced with insanely unrealistic expectations about risk and how markets work — as I wrote in February: This Next Market Crash Will Break Our Fragile Brains

This, as I have been saying for years, is a product of batshit insane monetary policy—which is set based on keeping the stock market at all-time highs, regardless of the two supposed mandates that the Fed has.

Everybody who has been in markets for a couple of decades has learned these lessons the hard way. Nobody knows more about being an arrogant, hubris-filled dickhead and getting a comeuppance multiple times more than I do. At some point, the market humbles you; you throw your hands in the air and surrender to the idea that there are people who know more than you, and that the market and its external driving factors are things that are going to be impossible to always predict.

When I was clearing out my old podcast episodes at the beginning of the year, when I decided I wasn’t going to do the podcast anymore, I left a few up for good measure—a few of my select favorites. One of them was a podcast I did with my friend Sang Lucci about blowing up your trading account, how often we’ve done it, and how it is a rite of passage along the way. Skip to about 25 minutes in when we get to it. I left it up in hopes that anybody going through the same thing we had gone through could take some comfort in listening to it.

Finally, to the extent posts about self-harm online are serious, I want to speak directly to anybody who’s having such feelings and reassure them we’ve all been there and they are not alone. They can always DM me on Twitter, shoot me a message on Substack, or contact me through other means, and I’ll try to do my best to remind them that, as Joey Knish says in Rounders, it’s not the end of the world. “From time to time, everybody goes bust.”

This is the game we choose. Money is not the end of the world and should never be. Would anybody choose to live or die over it, although I realize that’s not the way the world works?

And to my longtime followers—what does it say that I’m writing posts urging people thinking about doing the unthinkable not to do so over one 3% drawdown?

This is exactly the type of situation I’ve been talking about for years: an unexpected move lower in markets at a time when investors are the least mentally prepared to ever handle it. Hope everybody keeps their head on a swivel and ducks and weaves their way through any continuing volatility this coming week.

QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page hereThis post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.

This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. If you see numbers and calculations of any sort, assume they are wrong and double check them. I failed Algebra in 8th grade and topped off my high school math accolades by getting a D- in remedial Calculus my senior year, before becoming an English major in college so I could bullshit my way through things easier.

The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 17:30

Memphis Dem Rep. Decries 'Military Operation' After Feds Arrest Nearly 500 'Violent Criminals'

Memphis Dem Rep. Decries 'Military Operation' After Feds Arrest Nearly 500 'Violent Criminals'

Two weeks ago the FBI announced that 489 'violent criminals' had been arrested in Memphis over a 60-day period, which included 118 guns seized, in a multi-agency effort involving the FBI, DEA, Memphis PD, ICE, Homeland Security and other agencies.

Shortly after this announcement, Memphis law enforcement coordinated with DHS to deploy the National Guard to Memphis to assist the effort.

In response, 30-year-old Tennessee state Rep. Justin Pearson - who just launched a Democratic primary against longtime Rep. Steve Cohen, referred to the National Guard deployment in Memphis as a "military occupation."

"I think in this moment in time, where even our own city is under military occupation ... We have to stand up, we have to speak up, and we have to have people who are going to fight back and fight for our communities," said Pearson last week.

Watch:

He said it again on MSNBC...

Pearson's comments echo those of Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D), who went to 'war' with the Trump administration after Texas National Guard troops arrived in Illinois on Tuesday, tasked with protecting federal personnel and property as anti-immigration protests rage. 

Pritzker condemned the deployment, calling it "Trump's invasion," and calling on TX Governor Greg Abbott (R) to withdraw his support. Meanwhile, the state of Illinois - joined by the city of Chicago - filed a lawsuit in federal court to attempt to stop the deployment. 

Pritzker also suggested that America is currently witnessing the same thing as the Germans did in the early days of the Third Reich

“In the early days of the Nazi regime, they started slowly but surely taking away people’s rights,” Pritzker babbled during an interview.

“And what we’re seeing now is the very same thing,” he further declared.

In short, Democrats are ratcheting up the drama and actively opposing federal law enforcement efforts.  

*  *  * We have two new Reverse Osmosis water filters for you to check out...

Cheap and convenientCountertop Reverse Osmosis Filter (great in campers) with UV sterilization

1200 Gallon / Day Workhorse: High-Flow Alkalizing (Ph 7.5) Reverse Osmosis with 11-stage filtration & faucet. Comes with extra filters for 2-year supply

Intro Sale // Free Shipping // Both have great Amazon reviews

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 16:55

7 Minutes Outside: The Collapse Of Childhood Play

7 Minutes Outside: The Collapse Of Childhood Play

Authored by Hannah Frankman Hood via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Studies suggest that today’s kids get an average of 4–7 minutes of unstructured time outside a day, while they spend 7–8 hours a day in front of screens.

Shutterstock

With a youth mental health crisis also sweeping the nation (rates of anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, and diagnosed mental health disorders like ADHD are all at record highs), it’s not hard to imagine that the correlation between kids’ indoor confinement and their mental health struggles is more than a coincidence.

The mental health ramifications of too much screen time are easy to track, and are heavily studied. But the downstream effects of not enough time outside are equally startling. Free play and unstructured time are foundational to a child’s well-being, and in America, our kids aren’t getting it.

Seven minutes a day is barely enough time to begin to imagine the premise of a game or an imaginary adventure. Seven minutes a day is barely the amount of time it takes to walk back and forth from the bus stop. It’s not even long enough to go for a walk around the block.

Why Aren’t the Kids Outside?

The twenty-first century has provided us with a perfect storm of conditions keeping kids away from the outdoors: screens are alluring, the outside is “dangerous,” and parents encourage their kids towards sedentary “for your own good” activities (math olympiad! French tutoring! after school clubs!).

Parents fear the dangers of the outdoors. In the modern world, everything from crime statistics to urban design itself lead parents to keep their kids on a short leash. Urban settings don’t have much room for free play; parks and playgrounds and other child-centric outdoor spaces are strangely sparse, as if urban designers wanted a world without kids in it. More apartment complexes are built with dog-washing stations than playgrounds.

The modern world seems to have been built by people who forgot what childhood is, and fears of crime keep parents nervous about letting their kids freely use the spaces that do exist.

But separate from kid-centric space or the lack thereof, kids are busy. Their days are consumed by ever-expanding school requirements, structured extracurricular activities, and of course the ever-present lure of screen time—to the point that even in suburban neighborhoods with big backyards, kids are barely ever venturing outside.

Which is how we end up with kids getting seven to eight hours of screen time a day, but only four to seven minutes of unstructured free time outside—the latter of which people of our grandparents’ generations couldn’t have even imagined.

The “unstructured” part is important—“time outside” in a blanket sense isn’t enough. Spending an hour on the field for soccer practice gives kids the benefit of fresh air and sunshine and physical movement, but it isn’t giving them the psychological benefits of free play.

Unstructured means time and space away from the rules and instructions of an adult. It exists fully in the wild and whimsical world of the child: free, unimpeded, child-directed, and often tinged with a heavy dose of imagination. There are no set goals of the kind that exist in PE class or a sports club. It’s pure and unfettered, and it’s a biologically hardwired need for children’s development.

Mental Health Crisis in Childhood

Parents worry about the dangers of the outside world, but what about the dangers of the on-screen world, where grooming and exploitation are common occurrences, where adults behind screens pose as other children and talk to young people too naive to know what to watch out for? What about the physical dangers of a sedentary life?

Seventy-seven percent of American youth ages 17–24 are ineligible for military serviceThirty-three percent of 17–24 year olds are ineligible due to obesity. Of the young people who meet the weight requirements, another 25 percent don’t meet the physical fitness standards. Other physical conditions and mental health disorders are also leading causes of ineligibility.

The poor health of America’s youth has many factors—poor diet, exposure to environmental toxins, a rise in chronic conditions, and countless other variables. But with 30 percent of elementary schools no longer requiring daily recess, and 28 states without any requirements around recess at all, neither schools nor parents are consistently defending kids’ free outdoor time.

And what about the psychological dangers of not getting time outside to play?

Twenty percent of American adolescents ages 12–17 report experiencing symptoms of anxiety in the past two weeks, while 18 percent of adolescents report symptoms of depression. Forty percent of high schoolers report persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness. In 2023, the CDC found that 9 percent of adolescents had attempted suicide.

Of course, not all of this traces back to time spent outside, nor lack of it. But as we’re depriving kids of a fundamental part of their development, such a deficit might be at least partially to blame for the negative outcomes that follow.

Kids Need Free Play Outdoors

As researcher and psychologist Peter Gray says, “Children are designed, by nature, to play and explore on their own, independently of adults.” Gray is a fierce defender of kids’ physiological and psychological need for play, and his book “Free to Learn makes the case for the importance of self-directed time for a child’s development, with ripple effects into everything from academic performance to life outcomes.

Gray isn’t alone. As Lenore Skenazy argues in her book “Free Range Kids,” children need exactly what the term “free range” suggests—the ability to run wild and be free, not cooped up in the cages created by four walls and an adult’s supervision. Skenazy made national headlines after letting her 10-year-old ride the New York City subway home alone (unstructured and unsupervised outdoor time at its finest). Those headlines weren’t the good kind. Reporters were quick to title her “America’s worst mom,” and a media feeding frenzy followed (an unwatched child, normal mere decades prior, had become a scandal).

And yet, Skenazy was giving her son what so many others suffer for want of: freedom.

Letting your kids have outdoor time doesn’t require something as radical as giving them free range of New York City. Most parents would understandably balk at that. But there’s a wide swath of options between “wander New York City alone” and “have no time outside at all,” and frustratingly few find themselves in that median.

Even programs that give kids time outside—things like private schools with on-campus gardens, forest schools, or homeschool groups focused on time in nature—are considered frivolous, peculiar, and radical, respectively.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a minimum of 30–60 minutes of outdoor free play for children two and under. The CDC suggests a minimum of three hours of unstructured and vigorous free play for preschoolers (ages 3–5), with at least an hour of that time being spent outdoors, and at least an hour of vigorous physical activity (preferably outdoors) for school-aged children (ages 6–17).

These are all recommended baselines from some of America’s most mainstream health authorities. Many independent psychologists, developmental experts, and education researchers would consider those numbers to be the bare minimum.

Charlotte Mason, the nineteenth-century British educator whose methodology is still used today by large swaths of homeschoolers, argued that children should spend four to six hours a day outside whenever possible: “Never be within doors when you can rightly be without.”

Mason didn’t see outdoor time as “recess,” but as a fundamental part of a child’s education in its own right. For the early years, she considered it even more important than formal instruction, helping children develop their attentiveness, wonder, and observational skills. She advocated nature walks, observations of weather patterns and wildlife, keeping a nature journal, and long uninterrupted swaths of free play.

This unstructured playtime is part of the whimsy of childhood, but it also plays a critical role. Free play supports kids’ cognitive development, imagination, and executive function. Physical activity develops strength, coordination, and motor skills, and is shown to reduce anxiety. Studies suggest exposure to the microbiome of the dirt leads to a strengthened immune system, and can decrease stress. Exposure to natural sunlight supports a child’s natural circadian rhythm.

And of course, exposure to sunlight also improves vitamin D levels—the lack of which can cause everything from fatigue and a weakened immune system to, you guessed it, anxiety and depression.

Our kids are struggling, physically and psychologically, for want of time for free play and time outdoors. That fresh air and freedom, no matter how basic it seems, is fundamental to their health and success, as necessary to their health (if not their survival) as air and water.

Our parents and grandparents knew this by intuition; our forebears never considered it could even be a question, but our culture has slowly let it erode to become only the tiniest fraction of our kids’ lives.

Free play and time outdoors is indivisible from health and success. If we want to raise a healthy, happy, and thriving generation, then their outdoor time is a resource we must defend.

From the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER)

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 16:20

Watch: MSM Puppets Receive "New Talking Point Directive" Amid Info War 

Watch: MSM Puppets Receive "New Talking Point Directive" Amid Info War 

Establishment media puppets that align with the Deep State interests have received coordinated messaging directives this past week,  scripted talking points designed to advance ongoing informational warfare against the American public to obscure or downplay the very existence and activities of radical left group Antifa, which has been formally designated a domestic terrorist organization due to its repeated attacks on federal personnel, facilities, and other government assets. 

"New talking point directive just issued," journalist Tom Elliott wrote on X, accompanying a montage video showing leftist media puppets, from Jimmy Kimmel to Whoopi Goldberg, reading from what appears to be identical scripts in a coordinated misinformation and disinformation campaign. By now, the American people view the MSM not as news organizations but as a massive PR arm serving the interests of Deep State operatives.

But ... 

Related:

Civil terrorism expert Jason Curtis Anderson of One City Rising reminds folks that the Democratic Socialists of America is effectively Antifa. With that in mind, the coordinated misinformation campaign by the MSM now makes a little more sense.

While President Trump and the White House are full steam ahead in their quest to "dismantle Antifa"... 

We must remind readers that during the Antifa roundtable at the White House on Wednesday, Seamus Bruner, Director of Research at the Government Accountability Institute, correctly advised that the proper strategy to dismantle radical leftist networks is not to target Antifa directly at first, but to begin by disrupting and dismantling the dark-money-billionaire-funded NGOs to fund the permanent protest industrial complex that unleashed endless color revolution-style operations against President Trump. He emphasized that a web of leftist billionaires and foreign-backed entities has exploited the NGO world for a sinister agenda. 

Whoa (read the report).

Listen to Bruner. 

The same people who told you that Biden's mental acuity was strong, that Covid came from nature, that there was no southern border crisis, no inflation, and that Hunter Biden's laptop was "Russian disinformation" are now pushing yet another coordinated misinformation campaign.

*  *  * get long and strong

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 14:35

Nobel Peace Prize Organizers Probing Potential Insider Trades On Polymarket

Nobel Peace Prize Organizers Probing Potential Insider Trades On Polymarket

Authored by Sander Lutz via Decrypt.co,

The organizers of the Nobel Peace Prize are investigating whether insiders used privileged information about this year’s winner to profit on crypto prediction market Polymarket, according to local reports.

Jørgen Watne Frydnes, chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, displays a photo of winner María Corina Machado on his smartphone in Oslo on Friday © Rodrigo Freitas/NTB/AFP/Getty Images

Roughly 11 hours before the closely watched award was given to Venezuelan resistance leader Maria Corina Machado this morning, the odds of her victory surged from near-zero to over 70% on Polymarket. 

The market on this year’s Nobel Peace Prize winner has accumulated over $21.4 million in trading volume since opening in July.

For nearly all of that time, the odds of Machado receiving the coveted prize have hovered around a 1% or 2% likelihood. 

Then, Thursday night, shortly before 1:00 am Norway time, the Venezualan’s odds of winning surged to over 43%.

By 2:00 am, they hit 73%.

The identity of the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize -one of the most coveted awards in the world - is typically kept tightly under wraps. Even Machado herself did not find out she had won the award until minutes before the news was announced publicly in Oslo at 11:00 am this morning. 

The five-member committee tasked with selecting the award’s winner did not even come to a decision until this week, according to local reports.

But somehow, Polymarket traders appeared clued-in to their decision ahead of today’s flashy announcement.

The action appears to have kicked off at roughly 12:45 am Norway time this morning, when a trader on the site began betting thousands of dollars on the likelihood of Machado’s victory. Over the next several hours, they continued to buy and sell thousands of dollars worth of Machado positions, until they eventually redeemed $80,000 when the market resolved. 

Their account was created within the last 10 days, according to the Polymarket site. 

A spokesperson for the Nobel Institute did not immediately respond to Decrypt’s request for comment regarding what would happen if someone within or connected to the prize committee is found to have used insider information about the award to make a profit.

But while such activity may be looked down upon within such secretive organizations, it is widely considered a good thing in the world of prediction markets. The ultimate goal of prediction markets tends to be accurate information, not fairness, and Polymarket users were ultimately clued into this morning’s breaking news the night before. 

Polymarket’s terms of service, meanwhile, do not appear to restrict users’ use of insider or privileged information while making wagers. A representative for the company did not immediately respond to Decrypt’s request for comment on this story. 

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 14:00

Rare Blackouts Hit Southern Odessa Region Amid Russia's Pre-Winter Strikes

Rare Blackouts Hit Southern Odessa Region Amid Russia's Pre-Winter Strikes

Rare blackouts have occurred in Ukraine's southern Odessa region - a place which has largely been spared from sustained fighting - given the vital port is all the way to the south, across from the border with NATO member Romania.

This latest overnight Russian assault again targeted Ukraine's energy grid ahead of winter, with hundreds of thousands of households losing power in the attack.

Illustrative image of prior attack on Odessa, Anadolu Agency

"Last night, the enemy attacked energy and civilian infrastructure in the Odesa region," regional governor Oleh Kiper confirmed on Telegram. "Power engineers are making every effort to fully restore the power supply," he added.

To give a sense of just how vast the outage was, Ukrainian energy firm DTEK later said it was able to restore power to over 240,000 households in the region, but with many more still in need of help.

Just within the 24-hour prior, the Kyiv area also experienced rare blackouts, along with many other regions, after a key electrical generation plant was directly struck by either missiles or drones.

Reuters has attempted to calculate the scale of the prior Thursday to Friday overnight attack as follows:

The Russian massive attack on Ukraine's energy system on Friday caused temporary power cuts to more than one million consumers across the country, Reuters calculations based on local authorities data showed.

At least 420,000 families in the capital of Kyiv were affected, Ukrainian private energy firm DTEK said, announcing that power was restored.

President Zelensky called that prior major aerial assault on the capital a "cynical and calculated attack" and there are reports that a seven-year old boy was killed.

Russia has at this begun to launch missile and drones into Ukraine into the hundreds on a nightly basis, mainly targeting energy sites but also military centers. But these projectiles frequently also hit residential buildings and civilian neighborhoods.

The attacks have gone the other way too, but with less devastation. Ukraine has been sending drones into Russian territory nightly, frequently hitting oil facilities and manufacturing centers.

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 13:25

Wind, Solar Projects Can Stick Taxpayers With The Tab Coming And Going

Wind, Solar Projects Can Stick Taxpayers With The Tab Coming And Going

Authored by Gary Abernathy via The Empowerment Alliance,

When it comes to our energy future, it is often true that what many on the left consider an enlightened long-term view is in fact short-sightedness that fails to reflect the full consequences of their actions.  

Such is the case with the liberal media’s fawning over the Republican governor of Wyoming for his embrace of “alternatives,” including a glowing profile last year on CBS’ “60 Minutes” for his advocacy for wind turbines. “Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon pursues green, carbon-negative agenda in one of the nation’s reddest states,” trumpeted the online version of the piece. 

Many Wyoming residents are not on board, including from his own party. The state GOP passed a “no confidence” vote on Gordon in 2023 after his climate-related remarks at Harvard University. And a New York Times story (written in 2021, updated in 2023) on Wyoming’s energy landscape noted that many residents have frequent complaints about turbines taking over hunting land, lights polluting the night sky and energy transmitted out of state. The controversy has dragged on into 2025.  

For Gordon and others, “Wyoming is very windy” seems to be the simplified justification for erecting unsightly wind turbines across the landscape. But what makes a Republican official’s championing of wind or solar concerning is not so much his belief in the (dubious) effectiveness of the energy source as appearing to brush aside the actual cost to taxpayers.  

How many wind and solar farms have sprung up across the U.S.? Estimates show nearly 1,400 utility-scale wind farms and more than 6,700 solar farms. Those farms consist of more than 70,000 individual wind turbines and more than 200 million solar panels, (according to AI calculations based on available information on estimated capacity data and individual panel wattages).  

It’s important to understand the vast array of individual wind and solar components because someday, starting in the not-too-distant future, they will individually wear out. What happens then? 

According to government estimates, many turbines are already nearing end-life status, meaning they will either need “repowered” or decommissioned. “The time to disassemble, demolish, and remove wind turbine components and wind energy project-related infrastructure and conduct restoration activities can be 6–24 months, depending on the size of the turbines and the number of turbines involved in the project,” according to government guidelines.  

For solar installations, the issue is even more pressing. “By 2030, the United States will need to manage around one million tons of solar panel waste,” according to a recycling industry estimate. “This number is expected to grow to 10 million tons by 2050, making the U.S. the second-largest producer of solar panel waste globally. Currently, only about 10% of decommissioned panels are properly recycled, despite containing valuable materials like silver, silicon, and aluminum.” 

Proponents of “alternatives” insist that the costs for decommissioning wind and solar installations are typically assumed by companies through agreements negotiated at the time of construction. That’s small comfort considering that more than 100 solar companies have gone bankrupt in recent years, including residential, community solar projects and utility-scale installations. The year 2024 “saw an uptick in bankruptcy filings in each of these three sub-categories,” according to one industry tracker

When that happens, taxpayers, of course, can be left holding the bag, even in cases where companies were required to secure bonds or other sureties in case of their demise. The fact that each state has different rules and varying levels of accountability complicates the picture. And the Biden administration’s lenient posture toward “renewables” leaves taxpayers with real reason for concern.  

The Functional Government Initiative recently discovered that “in 2021, the Biden Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) waived the customary financial assurance for decommissioning on the lease of the Vineyard Wind project off the Massachusetts coast.” Subsequently, “Documents recently obtained by FGI show how much taxpayers are on the hook for if Vineyard Wind can’t afford to decommission: $191 million.” 

Gov. Gordon insists he is taking an “all of the above” approach to energy. To be sure, Wyoming remains the nation’s top coal producer and a leading oil and natural gas provider. But “all of the above” is less appealing when we acknowledge that wind and solar projects exist largely thanks to taxpayer largesse.  

One study says that from 2010 to 2023, solar received $76 billion in U.S. taxpayer subsidies, while wind received about $65 billion. That was before the Biden administration’s subsidies kicked in for “renewables,” which cost taxpayers $31.4 billion in 2024 and were projected to cost over $421 billion from 2025 through 2034, until the Trump administration began rolling back as many projects as possible. When it comes to “alternatives,” taxpayers were forced to put up billions in subsidies to build them, and will possibly be on the hook for untold costs to demolish them.  

It is not unreasonable to fear that the coming solar and wind graveyards could be America’s next superfund cleanup burden. Politicians from the right and left who bask in the temporary glow of mainstream media approbation for embracing the “renewables” movement will eventually be held to account when the sun sets on the solar economy, and when our tax dollars are gone with the wind. 

Gary Abernathy is a longtime newspaper editor, reporter and columnist. He was a contributing columnist for the Washington Post from 2017-2023 and a frequent guest analyst across numerous media platforms. He is a contributing columnist for The Empowerment Alliance, which advocates for realistic approaches to energy consumption and environmental conservation. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Empowerment Alliance or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 12:50

Crypto Carnage: Trump Tariff Tape-Bomb Triggers Largest Liquidation Event In History

Crypto Carnage: Trump Tariff Tape-Bomb Triggers Largest Liquidation Event In History

Crypto market traders were hit by record liquidations just days after Bitcoin touched an all-time high, after President Trump triggered a wave of cross-market volatility saying he would impose an additional tariff on China and export controls on software.

October has historically been a particularly strong month for Bitcoin’s price - a longstanding pattern that has led much of the crypto industry to expect the same results come every fall. The trend at first seemed poised to continue this year; the first week of this month, BTC surged some 10.5% to a new all-time high price north of $126,000.

Bitcoin plunged to $105,000 - its lowest since June - following Trump's aft-hours tweet yesterday...

...before bouncing back above $112,000

Ethereum was also clubbed like a baby seal...

But that was the least of it as dozens of so-called alt-coins saw almost total wipe-outs (h/t @TedPillows)

For people still don't know how bad yesterday was, here's a quick summary:

  • $ATOM went from $4 to $0.001

  • $SUI went frim $3.4 to $0.56

  • $APT went from $5 to $0.75

  • $SEI went from $0.28 to $0.07

  • $LINK went from $22 to $8

  • $ADA went from $0.8 to $0.3

Top 100 blue chips nuked 80% in a few minutes.

@LookOnChain noted in a post on X: "More than 1,000 wallets on Hyperliquid were completely wiped out in the market crash — losing everything.

"In total, 6,300+ wallets are in the red, with combined losses exceeding $1.23B.

205 wallets lost over $1M

1,070+ wallets lost over $100K"

CoinDesk reports that Leaderboard data reviewed by CoinDesk shows the top 100 traders on Hyperliquid gained $1.69 billion collectively.

In comparison, the top 100 losers dropped $743.5 million, leaving a net profit of $951 million concentrated among a handful of highly leveraged short sellers.

The biggest winner was wallet 0x5273...065f, which made over $700 million from short positions, while the largest loser, “TheWhiteWhale,” dropped $62.5 million.

As CoinTelegraph reports, traders betting big on the bull run suffered to an extent never seen in crypto market history.

Data from CoinGlass indicates that 24-hour liquidations reached nearly $20 billion, with long positions comprising the vast majority.

Coinglass described this as “the largest liquidation event in crypto history.”

Over the past 24 hours, bets worth more than $19 billion have been wiped out, and more than 1.6 million traders liquidated, according to Coinglass data.

More than $7 billion of those positions were sold in less than one hour of trading on Friday.

“The actual total is likely much higher — Binance only reports one liquidation order per second,” CoinGlass said on X about the figures.

The $19.31 billion in liquidations is more than ten times the losses seen during the COVID-19 crash ($1.2 billion) and the FTX collapse ($1.6 billion).

Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek has called for a regulatory investigation into exchanges that suffered the largest losses following a record $20 billion in crypto liquidations over the past 24 hours.

In a Saturday post on X, Marszalek urged regulators to “conduct a thorough review of fairness of practices,” asking whether trading platforms had slowed down, mispriced assets, or failed to maintain proper anti-manipulation and compliance controls during the crash.

“Regulators should look into the exchanges that had most liquidations in the last 24 hours,” he wrote.

“Any of them slowing down to a halt, effectively not allowing people to trade? Were all trades priced correctly and in line with indexes?”

Data from CoinGlass shows that Hyperliquid led all exchanges in liquidations, recording $10.31 billion in wiped-out positions. It was followed by Bybit with $4.65 billion, and Binance with $2.41 billion. Other major platforms like OKX, HTX and Gate saw smaller totals, at $1.21 billion, $362.5 million and $264.5 million, respectively.

Exchange order-book liquidity showed a severe imbalance between bids and asks - resistance was stacked around $120,000, while little support was in place to prevent a fresh dive toward the $100,000 mark.

In an X post on Friday, Bitwise European head of research, Andre Dragosch, said that the company’s intraday crypto asset Sentiment Index just “generated a strong contrarian buying signal.”

“The index reached an intraday low of -2.8 standard deviations - its lowest level since the ‘Yen Carry Trade Unwind’ in the summer of 2024,” Dragosch said.

Earlier this week, the Index was in “Greed” territory after Bitcoin reached new highs of $125,100 on Monday.

However, Santiment analyst Brian Quinlivan pointed out on Friday that Bitcoin’s recent all-time highs didn’t generate the same level of enthusiasm on social media as previous all-time highs.

“It was like a modest, run-of-the-mill reaction from the crypto audience,” Quinlivan said in an interview with the Thinking Crypto podcast published to YouTube on Thursday, referring to the level of bullish comments across social media after Bitcoin reached new highs of $125,100 on Monday.

“Really wasn’t much of anything,” Quinlivan said.

“It’s not nearly as euphoric as some of these previous ones,” he added.

Perhaps the most impacted asset of the day was Trump’s own crypto token. WLFI, the native token of World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s crypto platform, plummeted almost 50% immediately following the president’s China announcement, to just south of $0.10 a token. It has since partially recovered to $0.13...

David Jeong, chief executive officer at Tread.fi, an algorithmic crypto trading platform for institutional traders, said the market was experiencing a “black swan event.”

“It is likely that many institutions did not expect this level of volatility and with how leveraged perpetual futures are designed, many large traders, including institutions, would have gotten liquidated,” he said.

Perpetual futures are a type of contract with no expiration, and are used by crypto traders to trade leveraged positions around the clock.

The next major support level for Bitcoin is $100,000, according to Caroline Mauron, co-founder of Orbit Markets, below which “would signal the end of past three-year bull cycle.”

Vincent Liu, chief investment officer at Kronos Research, said the rout was “sparked by US-China tariff fears but fueled by institutional over-leverage.”

“This highlights crypto’s macro ties,” he said.

“Expect volatility, but watch for rebound signals in cleared markets.”

Bitcoin options market reflected Mauron’s views with highest number of ‘put’ or sell strikes at $110,000 and next highest at $100,000, according to data on Deribit platform.

“The focus now turns to counterparty exposure and whether this triggers broader market contagion,” said Brian Strugats, head trader at Multicoin Capital. He added that some estimates place total liquidations above $30 billion.

Ahead of all this carnage, US spot Bitcoin ETFs continued their strong “Uptober” performance with $2.71 billion in weekly inflows, marking another strong week for institutional demand.

“Capital keeps flowing into BTC as allocators double down on the digital gold conviction trade. Liquidity is building now as the market momentum takes shape,” Vincent Liu, chief investment officer at quantitative trading firm Kronos Research, told Cointelegraph.

Obviously, these flows came before the after-hours collapse that triggered the massive liquidations, but we are seeing a bid return in quiet Saturday trading.

“Trump’s tariff threat looks more like a negotiation tactic than a policy pivot, classic pressure play,” Liu said.

“Markets may flinch short term, but smart money knows the game: macro noise, conviction unchanged,” he added.

Finally, CoinTelegraph notes that stablecoin demand in China offers valuable insight into traders’ positioning.

When investors rush to exit the cryptocurrency market, stablecoins typically trade at a 0.5% or greater discount compared with the official US dollar/CNY rate.

Tether (USDT/CNY) vs. US dollar/CNY. Source: OKX

Tether had been trading at a slight discount since Wednesday, suggesting traders were previously cashing out as Bitcoin struggled to maintain bullish momentum.

However, the metric returned to parity after BTC fell below $120,000, indicating that traders are no longer eager to exit the crypto market.

*  *  * Try Ultra Testosterone Booster for FREE

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 12:15

Telegram's Durov: We're "Running Out Of Time To Save The Free Internet"

Telegram's Durov: We're "Running Out Of Time To Save The Free Internet"

Authored by Stephen Katte via CoinTelegraph.com,

Messaging app Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov warns that a “dark, dystopian world” is approaching, with governments worldwide rolling back privacy protections.

“I’m turning 41, but I don’t feel like celebrating. Our generation is running out of time to save the free internet built for us by our fathers,” said Durov in an X post on Thursday.

“Once-free countries are introducing dystopian measures,” said Durov, referencing the European Union’s Chat Control proposal, digital IDs in the UK and new rules requiring online age checks to access social media in Australia.

“What was once the promise of the free exchange of information is being turned into the ultimate tool of control.”

“Germany is persecuting anyone who dares to criticize officials on the Internet. The UK is imprisoning thousands for their tweets. France is criminally investigating tech leaders who defend freedom and privacy.”  

“A dark, dystopian world is approaching fast — while we’re asleep. Our generation risks going down in history as the last one that had freedoms — and allowed them to be taken away,” Pavel added.

Source: Pavel Durov

Privacy protections are a cornerstone of Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency industry. Bitcoin was created to operate pseudonymously, using addresses instead of names, and allowing peer-to-peer transactions without the involvement of banks, among other measures.

Germany may have blocked the EU’s Chat Control

EU lawmakers were set to vote on the Chat Control law next week, which critics argue undermines encrypted messaging and people’s right to privacy as it requires services such as Telegram, WhatsApp and Signal to allow regulators to screen messages before they are encrypted and sent.

The legislation, however, has been dealt a heavy blow, with the head of Germany’s largest political party coming out in opposition. Germany, which holds 97 seats in the European Parliament, was expected to have the final say on whether it would pass.

The president of messaging app Signal, Meredith Whittaker, said on Thursday that while Germany’s opposition to the measure is a relief, she warns that “the war is not over,” because it now moves to “the European Council, where the issue is unresolved.”

Source: Meredith Whittaker

She also warns that any further attempts to enact similar measures allowing the scanning of content should be opposed because it negates encryption and also creates “a dangerous backdoor.”

The technical consensus is clear: you can’t create a backdoor that only lets the 'good guys' in. However they're dressed up, these proposals create cybersecurity loopholes that hackers and hostile nations are eagerly waiting to exploit .”
UK’s Digital ID has sparked concerns, too

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced a digital ID scheme in September, which would require citizens to prove their right to live and work in the country.

The government is pushing the measure as a way to combat illegal workers, while also cutting down wait times to verify identities and gain access to government services, such as licenses, childcare, welfare and tax.

Critics argue that the scheme raises privacy concerns as individuals would be required to provide personal information to be stored on a government app, and it would be too easy for the government to misuse it.

Over 2.8 million people have already signed a petition opposing the introduction of a digital ID. Petitions that gain more than 100,000 signatures have to be considered for debate in Parliament.

Australia’s online age verification system raises privacy issues as well

Australia will restrict access to social media platforms for users under 16 from Dec. 10, and one of the measures floated to enforce the ban has been an online digital age verification system.

Lawmakers in the country argue that the scheme will protect minors from harmful content online. However, critics share similar privacy concerns with the UK system, namely that it could lead to government misuse and create privacy issues around the storage of data. 

*  *  * We have two new water filters for you to check out...

Cheap and convenientCountertop Reverse Osmosis Filter (great in campers) with UV sterlization

1200 Gallon / Day Workhorse: High-Flow Alkalizing (Ph 7.5) Reverse Osmosis with 11-stage filtration & faucet. Comes with extra filters for 2-year supply

Intro Sale // Free Shipping // Both have great Amazon reviews

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 11:40

Watch: MSM Interview Covers Up Ukrainian Fighter's Swastika Tattoo

Watch: MSM Interview Covers Up Ukrainian Fighter's Swastika Tattoo

In another embarrassing and revealing moment for Western mainstream media and its many puff pieces on Ukraine's neo-Nazi Azov Regiment, Canadian national broadcaster CBC has aired a news report this week from "an elite training facility" of its 3rd Assault Brigade in Kiev, featuring a fighter with a swastika tattoo on his arm.

The footage, released Thursday, blurred out the swastika tattoo of one of the main military trainers interviewed, but failed to do so in the video’s YouTube thumbnail. Comments were turned off, with a note attached in the YouTube description which reads: "A tattoo of an offensive symbol has been blurred in this video." Watch (officer with tattoo starts at :16 mark)

It was in June 2024 that the US State Department first announced that it had lifted its longtime ban on giving weapons and training to Ukraine's notorious Azov Brigade (often referenced by its earlier name Azov Battalion).

Since then, efforts to normalize Azov—which mainstream media had long ago grudgingly admitted was full of "neo-Nazi ideology"—have only grown.

The group's members have never been shy about sporting Nazi-inspired tattoos and patches. Ultimately, they haven't changed, only their Western supporters' perceptions of them have. 

The blurred out tattoo in question from the CBC footage:

Ukrainian scholar and historian, Dr. Marta Havryshko has on many occasions slammed Western media attempts to whitewash the extremist militia group. For example she once wrote:

“Azov changed” – the mantra of many liberal and progressive public in the West, who, after 24 Feb. 2022, demonstrate sympathy toward the Azov movement, whitewashing its past, justifying its present, and showing no concerns about its future.

Just this month, Ukraine's President Zelensky promoted Azov's founder, Andriy Biletsky, to the rank of Brigadier General, amid these efforts to downplay or cover up the group's clear neo-Nazi ideology.

*  *  * We have two new water filters to check out...

Cheap and convenientCountertop Reverse Osmosis Filter (great in campers) with UV sterlization

1200 Gallon / Day Workhorse: High-Flow Alkalizing (Ph 7.5) Reverse Osmosis with 11-stage filtration & faucet. Comes with extra filters for 2-year supply

Intro Sale // Free Shipping // Both have great Amazon reviews

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 11:05

The Hidden History Of Policy Theft & Skyrocketing Gold

The Hidden History Of Policy Theft & Skyrocketing Gold

Authored by Matthew Piepenburg via VonGreyerz.gold,

As gold continues to rocket north with continuous all-time highs, some investors are still wondering, well… why?

The answer has less to do with gold’s consistent physical and monetary properties, and more to do with historical human –and hence policy—weakness, which makes this metal almost too easy to understand.

Let’s dig in.

Lead to Temptation

Some crimes are harder to see than the classic patterns of masked men robbing citizens at gunpoint.

Here, we examine the ironic yet hard truth that unmasked policy makers are deliberately and quietly robbing their citizens with embarrassing impunity.

This temptation toward sovereign sins hiding in plain sight is done without black cowboy hats or stuffing cash into a burlap bag while scared bystanders hold their hands in the air.

Instead, politicos, in neckties and blue suits, commit identical theft with far greater subtlety and destruction—smiling the entire time for re-election.

How?

Currency De-Valuation as Policy: History 101

The answer, as always, lies in the history and math of deliberate currency devaluation to pay down unfathomable sovereign debts by robbing from the people.

To see this clearly, let’s start with a little history.

As far back as the 1500s, Sir Thomas Gresham (from which “Gresham’s Law” originated) explained that whenever trusted money (i.e., gold) circulates at the same time as bad currency (i.e., paper/fiat “money”), some folks eventually figure out that it is better to save in gold and spend in fiat.

From Ancient Rome Onwards

These patterns go as far back as ancient Rome, when leaders—over their ears in debt from too many promises, wars and drunken spending—began to chip away at the silver in their Denarius coins, debasing their currency to “pay” down debt.

Eventually (over a period of about 250 years), this resulted in a Denarius with zero silver content.

Medieval Europe later followed this desperate playbook by replacing its gold money with copper money.

The French did a similar debasement in the 1780s, and it ended with a lot of rolling heads…

This is because real money eventually drives out bad currencies whenever a fiat system approaches its breaking point.

This cycle became an economic rule which the 18th century French economist, Adolphe Thiers, spelled out clearly and which history subsequently confirmed from the wheelbarrow money of Weimar Germany to similar currency/debt debacles in Zimbabwe and Venezuela.

In such contexts of extreme debt and debased currencies, no one wants to hold worthless paper money.

The desire for real money-gold-becomes a desperate and historical thirst.

Gone With the Wind

During the US Civil War, for example, the Confederate States of 1865 were on their last leg, as its Army of Northern Virginia bled out during the Petersburg siege.

The army’s commander, Robert E. Lee, was obviously worried about saving his dwindling troops, but in the waning hours of the Confederacy, the primary theme of the letters to his most trusted general, James Longstreet, centred around gold rather than cannons, artillery or horses.

Why?

Because without real money, even his most devoted soldiers could not be supplied.

Unfortunately, their fiscally over-stretched Confederate President, Jefferson Davis, had already debased the Confederate currency to pay debts which their rebel economy could not sustain.

Wages, salaries and savings could not keep up with inflation rates (currency debasement), which not even the cleverest liars in Richmond could hide or deny.

After failed policies of familiar financial repression and capital controls, the jig was up on the rebel currency, and gold mattered more than bullets…

But there was not enough gold to go around.

Not long after, the Confederacy, like so many other paper-currency nations before and since, was gone with the wind…

But Not the USD!?

Some, of course, will rightly say: “The US today is nothing like ancient Rome, Weimar Germany or the Rebel South of 1865!”

Well, yes and no…

The USA (and USD) is certainly stronger than 19th 19th-century Confederate currency, a 3rd-century Roman Denarius or the German Mark of 20th 20th-century Weimar.

But debt is still debt, and US debt is embarrassing…

And global debt is no less so…

Unfortunately, Gresham’s law, like Thiers’ rules, still apply as much today as yesterday. The death just takes a little longer for a world reserve currency…

What we are seeing today with the USD’s open decline and mis-reported inflationary decay is, in fact, nothing new to man, history or economic rules.

Inflation Is Theft

Take another forgotten truth-teller of the forgotten science of honest economics, the 18th century Irish/Frenchman, Richard Cantillon, from which the “Cantillon Effect” got its name.

The Cantillon Effect, like history, teaches us that inflation is not only a deliberate theft by policy makers, but also a wealth transfer from the masses to the elites—something familiar to anyone paying attention to US history…

Cantillon shows how new money (i.e., printed or mouse-clicked money) is not accidental nor class-blind.

New money always goes to (and enriches) the top 10% first before it later shafts the bottom 90% second.

That is, the elites, who already own stocks and real estate (90% of US stocks are held by the top 10%), are the first to benefit from the obvious inflation in stocks and real estate, which always follows money creation in lock-step.

The TARP/QE-rescued Wall Street, for example, saw this first hand, when every new version of QE correlated 1:1 with a rise in a stock market drunk on the money printed post-GFC/2008.

In fact, commercial banks saw their greatest bonuses the very year that those same banks nearly broke the economy on a subprime mortgage scandal/scam.

But Main Street, temporarily quieted by stimmy checks, was slowly measuring their wages and savings accounts in dollars whose inherent purchasing power was melting by the day from the currency expansion which saved Wall Street while slowly gutting Main Street.

This inflation, of course, is an invisible theft, one which starts slowly and then comes all at once.

Dishonesty as Deliberate Policy

Average citizens feel themselves getting poorer while their leadership tells them inflation is only “transitory” or contained within “a 2-3% target range”—all of which is an open lie.

Actual (as opposed to “reported”) inflation is compounding at levels of at least 10% per year, which means the absolute purchasing power of the USD is dying at a similar rate.

US M2 money supply has expanded by 40% since 2020, which means the USD is effectively debasing at a similar rate.

This is precisely what policy makers in debt (from ancient Rome to modern DC) need to do in order to pay down debt with devalued money.

In other words, policy makers crush the currency—and hence the people—to sustain their debt and themselves.

But as clever thieves, policy-makers (central bankers, treasury secretaries and national leaders) do this slowly and with deliberate complexity, as well as with deliberate dishonesty, a fact which a more modern economist, Charles Goodhart, made clear in the 1970s.

That is, Goodhart was among the first to reveal that whenever sovereigns create inflation, growth or employment “targets” they are almost always, well: Lying.

And as we, and many others, have written with facts rather than drama, the tools, math, and tricks used to measure employment, inflation, growth, and even the definition of recession are all open lies to anyone willing to look under the hood of the creative math and writing coming out of DC, Brussels or London…

History Made Current

If we apply the admittedly simplified historical lessons and economic rules above to today’s current headlines, as to: 1) the decline of the dollar and 2) the undeniable rise in gold, we see our situation with almost eerie clarity: The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Just as Gresham and Thiers warned, central banks as well as informed investors have already begun to see the debasement of paper money.

They increasingly prefer real money – gold – over fiat toilet paper, even if that paper is the world’s reserve currency.

This explains the BRICS+ rise and open de-dollarization process away from the greenback and UST, which is no longer a slow-drip trend but a rapidly expanding direction.

This explains how the DXY has sunk below 100 since the US M2 expansion became desperate.

This explains why central banks have been net stacking gold and net selling USTs since 2014.

This explains why 20% of global oil sales are now occurring outside the US petrodollar.

This explains the open panic and disintegration on the COMEX and London exchanges, who are seeing net outflows of physical gold to satisfy counterparty thirst for the metal.

This explains why even the BIS has made gold a Tier-1 asset.

This explains why the IMF sees pure gold as fundamental to its otherwise impure CBDC initiatives.

This explains the three consecutive years of central bank gold stacking at record levels of above 1000 tons per annum since the USA weaponized the USD in 2022.

This explains why central banks now hold more gold than USTs on their balance sheets for the first time since 1996.

This explains why even Morgan Stanley must now openly confess/recommend a 20% gold allocation.

This explains why Judy Shelton wants to introduce a gold-backed UST.

This explains the desperation of the Genuis Act to create stablecoin demand for otherwise unloved USTs and USDs.

In short, and just as Gresham and Thiers warned centuries ago, the world is hoarding gold and turning away from bad money.

And just as history also warned, the USD is being openly devalued to pay down a debt crisis of their own making.

We’ve Seen this Movie/De-Valuation Before

But this, too, is nothing new for our clever thieves from above.

In 1933, FDR, by executive order, confiscated gold at $20/ounce and then, overnight, revalued it to $35/ounce, and in doing so, devalued the dollar by 69% in order to make its debt burden 69% less onerous.

In 1971, Nixon shamelessly welched on the USD and the world by removing its gold backing. Since then, the dollar has lost well over 90% of its purchasing power.

Honest vs. Dishonest Money

Such measures certainly made Uncle Sam’s appalling bar tab easier to repay, but only by gut-punching those trusting citizens who measure their wealth, savings, portfolio returns and retirement in USDs.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how policymakers attempt to stay in power– by quietly robbing their citizens of paper wealth, which in the end, is slowly no wealth at all.

And that too, fully explains the record highs and headlines in the current gold price, for gold is not rising due to speculative mania, it’s merely and honestly reflecting its relatively superior value over dishonest paper money—something gold has done throughout history.

As noted bluntly before, Gold is the lie detector for a broken financial system.

Or stated even more clearly: Gold is rising because corrupted fiat money is falling, yet again…

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 10:30

Putin Skewers Nobel Committee, Praises Trump's Gaza Efforts

Putin Skewers Nobel Committee, Praises Trump's Gaza Efforts

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday heaped praise on President Donald Trump's efforts to broker a ceasefire in the Middle East and at the same time trashed the Nobel Committee.

Putin said to reporters while in Tajikistan that Trump "is definitely making an effort and working on these issues - on achieving peace and resolving complex international affairs. The clearest example of that is the situation in the Middle East."

"Whether the current US president deserves the Nobel Prize or not, I don’t know. But he is truly doing a lot to resolve complex crises that have dragged on for years, even decades," the Russian leader added.

He then slammed the Nobel Committee for awarding its prestigious peace prize to "people who did nothing for peace" - in reference to the announcement just hours before that of Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado being this year's winner.

"In my view, those decisions have done enormous damage to the prize’s reputation," Putin told reporters.

President Trump had actually later in the day acknowledged Putin's words, and expressed agreement with them on Truth Social. He thanked the Russian leader in a rarity for a US president. Also, Russian media was quick to take note...

But one crucial area where there hasn't been much of a breakthrough is the Ukraine war. Putin described in his comments that Russia and the United States "could still accomplish a lot more" based on what was discussed and agreed upon with Trump during their Aug. 15 summit in Alaska.

"We didn’t fully disclose what was discussed in Anchorage. We continue to operate based on those talks and have made no changes on our part," Putin said.

This somewhat contradicts his own officials, who have said that any positive momentum from the engagement has faded and been exhausted. Currently the US may still be mulling sending Kiev Tomahawk missiles, which would certainly sink US-Moscow relations.

For peace to be achieved, Ukraine would have to make territorial concessions, but the Zelensky government and its European backers have shown no interest in taking this step. Instead they have openly resisted it even as a possibility, with Zelensky not even appearing to contemplate giving up Crimea.

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 09:55

Trump Suggests Dropping Spain From NATO Alliance Over Defense Spending

Trump Suggests Dropping Spain From NATO Alliance Over Defense Spending

Authored by Victoria Friedman via The Epoch Times,

President Donald Trump suggested on Oct. 9 that Spain could be thrown out of NATO after Madrid declined to commit to boosting defense spending to 5 percent of gross domestic product (GDP).

Trump made the remarks during an Oval Office meeting with the leader of the defense alliance’s second-newest member, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, where the world leaders discussed NATO’s almost-universal pledge to increase defense expenditure.

The U.S. president said to his Finnish counterpart: “Well, we had to do it, and you were great about it. Spain has not been. Spain is the one that didn’t do it. And so, I think you people are going to have to start speaking to Spain. The only one that didn’t do it, the only NATO country that didn’t do it is Spain, and you'll figure what that’s all about, right?

Trump said later during the exchange: “We had one laggard. It was Spain, Spain. You have to call them and find out why are they a laggard, and they’re doing well, too.

“They have no excuse not to do this, but that’s all right. Maybe you should throw them out of NATO, frankly.”

Responding, Spain reaffirmed its commitment to the alliance, with the country’s defense minister, Margarita Robles, saying that Spain delivers on its pledges.

“These statements were made in a specific context, but I know for a fact that the U.S. Armed Forces are well aware of Spain’s commitment,” Robles said.

The defense minister in July had spoken of Spain’s reliability in the alliance during a visit to NATO headquarters in Naples, Italy, where she said that “NATO can count on Spain.”

According to a Spanish government statement from July 18, Robles said that “there are no debates or speeches that can overshadow Spain’s commitment and reliability in terms of NATO, because our commitment is robust.”

5 Percent of GDP

On June 25, Trump joined the leaders of the 31 other NATO member countries at a summit in The Hague, the Netherlands, where the alliance endorsed a new defense spending target of 5 percent of GDP—more than double the 2 percent benchmark set during a summit in Wales in 2014.

The president had been pushing for an increase in spending to redress an imbalance between what the United States and its non-U.S. allies spend.

document called Funding NATO on the alliance’s website points to this imbalance, stating:

“The combined wealth of the non-US Allies, measured in GDP, is almost equal to that of the United States.

“However, non-U.S. Allies together spend less than half of what the United States spends on defence.

“This imbalance has been a constant, with variations, throughout the history of the alliance and has grown more pronounced since the tragic events of 11 Sept. 2001, after which the United States significantly increased its defence spending.”

During his first term, Trump frequently brought up this disparity, and the subject reemerged during the 2024 presidential election.

In October 2024, Trump’s then-running mate and now vice president, JD Vance, said: “Donald Trump wants NATO to be strong. He wants us to remain in NATO. But he also wants NATO countries to actually carry their share of the defense burden.”

Spain’s Exemption

In the run-up to the June 25 summit, several countries had already backed Trump’s call to increase their pledges, including Poland, Lithuania, and Estonia.

However, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said his country had made a deal with NATO to exclude itself from the increased target.

“Spain will, therefore, not spend 5 percent of its GDP on defense, but its participation, weight, and legitimacy in NATO remain intact,” Sánchez said in a televised address on June 22.

“We fully respect the legitimate desire of other countries to increase their defense investment, but we are not going to do it.”

He added that Spain could meet all of its commitments to NATO, in terms of staff or equipment, by spending only 2.1 percent of its GDP.

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez speaks during a press conference after the plenary session at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 25, 2025. Markus Schreiber/AP

According to NATO’s latest estimates from June, Spain is one of the lowest spenders on defense, just hitting 2 percent of GDP.

Poland is the highest spender out of the alliance, at 4.48 percent, followed by Lithuania (4 percent), Latvia (3.73 percent), Estonia (3.38 percent), Norway (3.35 percent), the United States (3.22 percent), and Denmark (also 3.22 percent).

At a pre-summit press conference on June 23, a journalist asked NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte how, given the exemption for Spain, he was going to make sure the 5 percent pledge did not become an empty promise.

Rutte replied, “Alluding to Spain, NATO has no opt-out, and NATO doesn’t do side deals.”

He said countries within the alliance “have the sovereign right, and also the flexibility, to determine their paths for delivering on the NATO commitments.”

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 09:20

Where Is Pensioner Poverty The Most Prevalent?

Where Is Pensioner Poverty The Most Prevalent?

Four in ten people aged 66 and older in Korea were living in relative income poverty in 2022, according to the latest data from the OECD. That year, 39.7 percent of Korean seniors were living on an income below half the national median equivalized household income - the highest elderly poverty rate recorded across the OECD. The rate has remained stubbornly high over the past decade and edged up slightly between 2021 and 2022.

Still, this figure has improved from a high of 47.8 percent in 2011, when the OECD began publishing this data for Korea. Analysts note that the country has made significant strides towards improving its social security for older adults over the last decade, citing how a key factor behind the persistently high rate is the relatively recent launch of Korea's pension system in 1988, which has yet to reach full maturity. Public pension coverage has continued to expand in recent years, though disparities remain, particulalry between men and women, due to decades of unequal access to formal employment, as noted by Moon Joon-hyun of the Korea Herald.

But, as Statista's Anna Fleck details belowKorea is not alone in facing high elderly poverty.

 Where is Pensioner Poverty the Most Prevalent? | Statista

You will find more infographics at Statista

Fellow OECD countries such as Estonia, Latvia and New Zealand also reported elevated rates in 2022, each exceeding 33 percent.

New Zealand, in particular, has seen a sharp increase, rising from 20 percent in 2019 to 34 percent in 2022. A report from Te Ara Ahunga Ora Retirement Commission found that rising living costs have severely impacted older New Zealanders, with 46 percent of respondents aged 65 and over saying they had reduced social activities, 28 percent reporting they now buy less food and 26 percent delaying medical treatment.

By comparison, elderly poverty rates in other OECD nations were significantly lower in 2022.

The Nordic countries, including Denmark, Finland and Norway, continued to report some of the lowest rates, each below eight percent, reflecting their strong welfare systems and social protections.

Meanwhile, the United States reported a rate of around 23 percent, with little change since before the pandemic.

The United Kingdom remained steady at around 15 percent, while Canada’s rate was just under 12 percent.

The OECD defines elderly poverty as affecting individuals aged 66 and older, and notes that countries with similar poverty rates may still differ significantly in the actual income levels of those considered poor.

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 08:45

"We Will Not Agree!" - Polish President Rejects EU Migrant Relocation Plan

"We Will Not Agree!" - Polish President Rejects EU Migrant Relocation Plan

Authored by Thomas Brooke via Remix news,

Polish President Karol Nawrocki has told European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that Poland will not accept any attempt by EU institutions to impose migrant relocations within its borders.

In a letter sent to Brussels, Nawrocki stated that such actions would be unacceptable and urged the Commission to focus on securing the European Union’s external frontiers and combating illegal immigration.

“I would like to kindly inform you that Poland will not agree to any actions by European institutions that would be aimed at relocating illegal migrants in Poland, and I hope that you will take this fact into account in your actions,” the president wrote, honoring his electoral pledge to firmly reject the bloc’s Migration and Asylum Pact.

Nawrocki reminded von der Leyen that Poland’s eastern frontier has for years faced “constant migratory pressure, controlled by the Moscow regime with the help of the Belarusian state and intelligence services.” He noted that Warsaw has devoted “significant resources” to protecting the EU’s border and to supporting Ukrainian refugees displaced by Russia’s war.

“In 2025, there are still nearly a million Ukrainian refugees in Poland,” Nawrocki wrote. “After Feb. 24, 2022, the Polish state acted responsibly and accepted Ukrainian citizens fleeing the war. We offered not only our own homes but also the state’s support that was needed at that time. Poland acted in solidarity, even though it was not bound by the obligation to show solidarity.”

Nawrocki said the bloc’s focus should not be on redistributing migrants within Europe but on stopping illegal crossings in the first place.

“I agree that illegal migration is a problem that Europe must address, but the solution is not to forcibly return migrants to Central and Eastern European countries,” he wrote. “Our common task should be, above all, to seal borders and combat smugglers.”

The Polish leader also noted that opposition to migrant relocation is shared across the political spectrum in Poland, including, at least in principle, Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s left-wing coalition government.

“If it occurs to anyone in Europe to consider that Poland should take on other burdens, then regardless of who says it, I will say that Poland will not implement it. End of story,” Tusk said earlier this year, albeit ahead of the presidential election.

“The overwhelming majority of Poles, regardless of political affiliation, oppose the forced relocation of migrants to Poland,” Nawrocki wrote, adding that his election campaign had centered on ensuring “that Poles feel safe in their own country” and preserving national sovereignty.

“One element of this security is undoubtedly the absence of the risk of illegal migration, which has been flooding Western Europe since German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s memorable decision in 2015,” he continued.

Nawrocki reaffirmed that he “will not consent to the implementation of the Pact on Migration and Asylum in Poland” but said Warsaw remains ready to cooperate in other areas. “At the same time, I remain ready to cooperate on border protection, joint operational activities, information exchange, and technical support for Member States most exposed to migratory pressures,” he concluded.

In February, the Polish legal foundation Ordo Iuris told Remix News that the European Union’s migration pact could see up to 100,000 migrants relocated to Poland every year.

“All will depend, of course, on the number of migrants arriving by the Southern routes, so it is a very rough estimate. But we stand by it,” said the institute’s Olivier Bault.

“In most cases, Poland will be unable to deport them, even if their asylum applications are denied,” Bault added.

When asked specifically about Poland and any possible exemption previously, EU commission spokesman Markus Lammert told press that “EU law is binding on the member states and the migration pact, as a result of its entry into force, is binding law.”

Read more here...

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 08:10

Geert Wilders Suspends Campaign Due To 'Jihadi-Inspired Terrorist' Plot, Assassination Threats

Geert Wilders Suspends Campaign Due To 'Jihadi-Inspired Terrorist' Plot, Assassination Threats

In yet another example of how 'peaceful' both the Left and hardline Sunni/Salafi immigrants are, and in the wake of the Charlie Kirk assassination last month in the US, Dutch populist politician Geert Wilders - who the media constantly dubs Hitler "far Right" - has suspended his campaigning for elections later this month, due to ongoing threats to his life.

Specifically he was informed by authorities that he was a potential target of a suspected plot in Belgium to kill conservative politicians using a drone carrying explosives. Three men were arrested in Antwerp in the foiled attack believed to primarily be aimed at Belgium's Prime Minister Bert De Wever.

Via Shutterstock

"The NCTV does not foresee any 'residual threat' but I have a bad feeling and I am therefore suspending all my campaign activities for the time being," Wilders said after a briefing he received. 

Police raids in Antwerp recovered a homemade bomb, shrapnel loads, and evidence of apparent efforts to put together an explosive-laden drone. Washington Post details:

Prosecutors said the police raids were part of an investigation into “attempted terrorist murder and participation in the activities of a terrorist group.” They didn’t identify the politicians who might have been targeted.

But Belgian government ministers identified Prime Minister Bart De Wever as one target. On X, Wilders posted a Belgian news report that he and De Wever’s successor as Antwerp mayor, Els van Doesburg, were also on the hit list. All three are right-wing politicians.

Wilders' outspoken stance against Islam as well as mass migration policies has actually resulted in some level of police protection and higher security going all the way back to 2004.

Dutch Justice Minister Foort van Oosten posted on X that he has ordered the Dutch counterterrorism office "do everything necessary to enable Mr. Wilders to resume his work as soon as he wishes."

The founder and leader of Party for Freedom (PVV) has attracted controversy and hate due to his outspokenness on Europe's migrant problem and the commentary like the following:

Wilders had previously canceled a planned radio debate, after which he was notified directly of the threat by the Dutch intelligence agency NCTV.

It does appear the plotter arrested in Belgium are Islamic radicals, given that Belgian prosecutors have described the intention of the suspects "was to carry out a jihadi-inspired terrorist attack targeting politicians."

Tyler Durden Sat, 10/11/2025 - 07:35

Pages