Recent comments

  • Right, policy proportionate to the situation at hand, esp. policy based on fact is dead in D.C.

    Did you figure out how to write an Instapopulist? If not, I need to know where the bottleneck is so I can fix it.

    Reply to: Will the S&P Fraud Case Be Just Another Wrist Slap for Financial Alchemy?   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • Steal one dollar, you're a criminal. Steal millions, you're the best and brightest. Steal it all, you're a bankster running global governments.

    My apologies to Jean Rostand from whom I modified the famous "Kill one man, and you are a murderer . . ."

    The theft of one dollar is a crime, the theft of billions is government protected banksterism. (Modification of Stalin's quote, with no apologies to Stalin).

    Reply to: Will the S&P Fraud Case Be Just Another Wrist Slap for Financial Alchemy?   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • I agree and Corzine while minor in comparison to the financial crisis has to be the most "insider" off the hook there ever was.

    This is why at the end of this article I suspect this is all to push up the settlement fine. This won't even make it to trial and it's civil so no one will go to jail.

    In the DOJ filing, executives are left anonymous and called by letter, executive A, B, C.

    The guilty are named. Even when there are memos, emails, witnesses, paper trail and even corporate strategic documents nobody goes to jail.

    Reply to: Will the S&P Fraud Case Be Just Another Wrist Slap for Financial Alchemy?   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • S & P, it's just a show to show the DOJ, six years after the crash, is really doing something, no, really. It's just to make Holder, a carryover into Obama Bankster Administration II, look like he's not completely in the bag for Wall Street.

    This case is not as easy to prove as other cases involving Wall Street, and there's a reason it's being pursued. If the DOJ has any difficulty (and it will - it's not impressive), they will say, "Look, it's hard to prove financial crimes, despite 500 AUSAs and FBI Special Agents, so leave us alone, we tried and got a decent settlement." So they will struggle, maybe get a settlement, and then basically ask everyone else to leave them alone, the DOJ and others tried and semi-succeeded or semi-failed.

    However, this is the important part, look at who the DOJ hasn't gone after, despite mountains of evidence and actual testimony on the record. Corzine? I mean really, talk about endless conflicts of interest, blatant theft, blatant illegal wire transfers, etc. Also, Dimon and JP Morgan were involved in that. DOJ - NOTHING. JP Morgan and the White Whale? Nope. JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs involving aluminum price manipulation that filters down to Coke and consumers? They actually own warehouses to store aluminum, what do i-banks own factories to store aluminum for other than to keep it off the market? Nope. Investment banks manipulating other commodities (e.g., oil)? Nope. Also, how about LIBOR manipulation? Talk about easy case with hundreds or thousands of possible new inmates and trillions in losses? How many banks were involved in that? How many hundreds of billions could be taken from the criminals in that long-running crime?

    Who went to prison from HSBC, Standard Chartered, Wells Fargo (Buffett's bank), and other banks for laundering money for terrorists and other criminals? No one. In fact, where are those criminal prosecutions? Nowhere because they never happened and were settled quickly in civil actions. Pathetic.

    And off Wall Street, how come Murdoch is still walking free? Phone hacking, FCPA, police bribery, tampering with evidence, etc. Another easy case for Holder or any AG in any state with jurisdiction. How about insider trading by Buffett with access to Obama and bailout plans near the time he buys stocks or deals with Wall Street players like Goldman Sachs, etc.? But these are all contributors to the right politicians. They meet and are meeting with those in charge. They dictate who gets bailed out and who doesn't.

    S&P? Just a sacrificial lamb that won't affect anything, it's to appease the folks that think, "Gosh, Obama sure does say he is taking on corruption, but he's meeting with Blankfein, and Corzine's still free, and Dimon's got the President's ear, hmmm. . ."

    Reply to: Will the S&P Fraud Case Be Just Another Wrist Slap for Financial Alchemy?   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • Business wants foreign workers to technology transfer and labor arbitrage. Last CIR in 2006 2007 didn't even really offer a "pathway to citizenship" due to the structure, it was an illusion, all to flood the U.S. with STEM and other degreed workers.

    Kurtz, you should try the Instapopulist for outrages like this. Click on rich text editor to pull up the WYSIWYG editor and the chain icon is a way to format links.

    Reply to: What's Wrong with this Economic Picture?   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • Look who's invited to the White House, why it's Lloyd Blankfein, bankster himself. This is what's going on when the economy isn't improving for years and Americans can't find jobs, the White House invites people that should be in prison for life for money laundering and fraud to the White House! And guess what they are discussing? Do you think this President and Congress are focused like "lasers" to help Americans get jobs? Hell no, the President of the USA is meeting with banksters and other CEOs to get more foreigners here to make it even more difficult to survive in America. Who out there thinks this government is for us and by us anymore? I mean people that destroyed the global economy are meeting with the President to make it impossible to work in our own country.

    Average Joe or Jane is deemed "unqualified" to work in the USA for a living wage despite being a veteran with a BA or a PhD in nuclear physics and 30 years of experience and meeting exact requirements for the job, but these people with no experience or education in immigration or struggling in normal jobs are deemed fit to form immigration policy (which also affects the budget, law enforcement, education, infrastructure, and many other areas) and get to speak directly with the Pres.? Sickening.

    I wonder how many favors, promises, speech fees, and jobs for friends and family will be lined up today. By the way, how many unemployed and working poor were invited today. Let's see, let's count them, give me a sec. . .
    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-02-04/goldman-s-blankfein-yahoo-s-...

    Reply to: What's Wrong with this Economic Picture?   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • There is a complete disconnect between D.C., Wall Street and real life in America economically. The reason, in part, Federal government jobs have way better benefits, retirement, wages is due to unions. There are more unionized workers whereas the private sector unions have been decimated. It matters, it really does for job security. Federal workers shouldn't be chastised for keeping good jobs, more the private sector should be condemned for their never ending race to the bottom on wages, labor, jobs, benefits and retirement. They squeeze workers to improve their quarterly profit statements and make sure their executives get multi-million dollar bonuses.

    Reply to: The Never Ending Little Changed Unemployment Figures for January 2013   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • The job search without results (and literally thousands of times of complete silence) is crushing people out here. About.com and Gawker unemployment stories are great (in the sense of truth, not "great" because it's pure misery). It's a savage government that's turned its back on so many people as it serves the $, and the people with semi-decent to good gigs are merely hoping silence or just going along will spare them from unemployment (nope, no one's special, no one's skills are that great when penny pinching is all that matters). And for those in the federal government that think they can never be fired while enjoying six-figure salaries and are somehow special, those jobs aren't assured when the tax base amounts to a mere fraction of its former self - everyone will learn they are just a number on the ledger that can be cut when needed by the bonus seeking big dogs at the top.
    I doubt there's one family out there that's not touched by long-term unemployment (outside political/plutocratic circles of course).
    Imagine the millions of people that had small businesses go bankrupt, are contractors, temps, etc. that were never eligible for Day 1 of benefits. So where'd they all go and how fast did they wind up homeless? Because I don't see anyone talking about the millions of people in that boat other than them.
    Nope, this country is being flushed down the sh**ter in the race to the bottom. And if people think it ends at Chinese wages, think again. Truly evil greedy bastards can replace anyone with slave or inmate labor in any hellhole around the world as long as quality doesn't matter and it's all about price. I'm training a secret army of parrots and sloths to replace Congress and every other politician. They are more honest, will listen to their constituents' concerns, smarter, and work much cheaper (I'm taking a lesson from the plutocrats). And being a good American, all of these sloths, parrots, and other creatures will also be American, because that will be the first step in ending this lunacy.

    Reply to: The Never Ending Little Changed Unemployment Figures for January 2013   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • Four months is a long time to be without a paycheck. It does sound too low considering how bad the job market really is. I find the press ridiculous for even the official unemployment rate is way too high to be acting like this is over. More, for the last two years, the job additions are more close to maintaining population growth that really creating jobs.

    I also agree, the politicians are completely corrupt and touting "middle class" when they helped destroy the middle class is most irritating. Probably one of the most offense things, to see rhetoric trying to claim up is down, black is white for U.S. labor. Both parties, when it comes to the regular people do this spin, seemingly in a race to perfect their propaganda as an agenda!

    Reply to: The Never Ending Little Changed Unemployment Figures for January 2013   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • The labor participation rates and SNAP usage are just showing how dismal the situation is, that's what is really telling. We're looking at labor participation rates not seen since 1981. Given the lack of job creation (what are we looking at, maybe 150,000) there's no way median length of unemployment is 16 weeks. Especially with the 99ers now 1, 2, or 3 years past 99, median stats have to be way up there. There's also the claim by some that unemployment for people with BAs is somehow massively lower than those with only high school degrees. There are actually claims that the rate for BAs or BSs is somewhere around 3.6%. No way. In fact, people are finding that college degrees make them less likely to get hired in the healthcare and service jobs that now comprise the majority of "new jobs" in this NAFTA, CAFTA, TPP era in the US. These are just lies meant to get people to go into debt for useless degrees (in the sense that they don't help secure a job, not in the sense that the skills or knowledge are useless) in the hopes that they might get a leg up. Once they go into debt, the banksters own them and they are still unemployed.

    Even reading the Huffington Post, which has been ardently in favor of Obama and Dems for a long time, people aren't buying into anything regarding jobs, job creation, unemployment stats, etc. from either party. People of most stripes (unless they simply refuse to think) realize that politicians just don't care. They serve the $. The politicians aren't unemployed, their friends and relatives will get rich no matter how lazy or idiotic they are, and the corrupt win. Nothing changes because they have no reason to change, they love the status quo.
    By the way, Bill Clinton is still making the rounds around the country making speeches, attending politicians' funerals, etc. These people have no shame, they helped destroy the middle class in this country, and they still enjoy acting like the kings they think they are. Is Clinton or any other politician thinking about the suffering Americans unemployed or in crap jobs this week? Nope, they don't care, they are rich and that's all that matters to them, that and people stroking their egos.

    Reply to: The Never Ending Little Changed Unemployment Figures for January 2013   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • The comments are now threaded and heavily dynamic. I personally have to have threaded comments to follow the discussion. When clicking on individual comments to read they should automatically display for you now as well as the page should stay open once you click the comment section display.

    Update: There are still bugs in the comments, working on a fix. The idea is to have dynamic comments, yet if one wants to read an individual comment from the recent comments list, or the various rss feeds, that particular comment is automatically displayed and then one can open the rest surrounding ones. It works for replies at the moment, but not for top level comments. The rest stands on your input. The idea is to make comments easier to read and follow yet not cause this massive super long page that one must scroll through to read them all.

    Update 2: Oh so sorry, comments were supposed to stay open after replying to a comment and they were in test. I wonder if I should have written this from scratch instead of taking some code that wasn't working and trying to fix it at this point. Sorry, hopefully will have a new version in the next couple of days.

    Please be the guinea pigs, click about and let me know what problems, irritants and whatever you think about the comments. Easy discussion is critical to EP and if these fall short just let me know.

    The "recommend" gray button on the right, please consider using. After a while the plan is to have comment du jour is a special box and that would be the comment with the most recommends. That little box actually records all of the recommendations so we have highlight awesome commentary.

    =========
    The comments finally at least have the major bugs fixed. There were no working AJAX comments code available. In Drupal open source, all of it would throw errors and not function. I took the least spaghetti code one and rewrote it to function in a manner I thought usable plus fixing the outright coding bugs. Beyond testing for security issues I didn't do much design/cross platform testing. Bottom line, please let me know if something is not working or just ridiculous.

    Reply to: Site Upgrade!   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • The press and Wall street are diverging from all sorts of economic indicators. Clearly the uber-rich are "sick" of a weak economy, so metrics be damned, let's all pretend it's recovery time. I'm not kidding and I hope to play catch up, even though they will all be late overviews as well as some posts on why this is simply not the 14000 DOW. Seriously this is beyond belief and traders have to be doing some sort of HFT whatever nonsense. More soon.

    Think I finally found the comment bug, hopefully fixed as well this weekend.

    Reply to: Suddenly 647,000 More Jobs Appear in the January Employment Report   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • Yeah, let's say it, because that's all that matters to the elite. And for those that think that red vs. blue matters, wake the f up. It's elitism vs. you, it's 1% vs. you. Are your children or siblings jumping right into consultancies, network news, business, Wall Street? Of course not, this is the really real world where merit means jacksh*t and connections and corruption and profits above your fellow Americans is ALL.

    Read the local news. Those "unattended" and "suspicious" deaths that are happening with increasing frequency since 2007, they are suicides. Your friends, your neighbors, etc., in a land with 20%+ of the population experiencing unemployment for more than 3, 4, or 5+ years of unemployment, what do you think would happen? Jesus, what do these people with IQs of 100 in Congress think would happen (if they think between collecting payoffs)? And for those that blame the red or blue, save it, they both love the misery because they owe their allegiance to the corporate/bankster masters wherever they reside (e.g., see Morsi/Lockheed deal - military-industrial complex says what). The Gilded Age Redux - only in 2013, it's more corrupt. Mark Twain would be silenced by a drone brought to you by a defense contractor that loves both Democrats and Republicans and pays millions to both parties because the Founding Fathers would love 24/7 surveillance and bombs in America and overseas (probably not). USA 2013! AWESOME!

    Damn you Bill of Rights, how dare you stand in the way of PROFITS and selling out America's national security to foreign nations!

    And the best part about it all is if someone wrote Republicans are awesome and the bestest bestest, that would get 1 million hits. And Democrats are the bestest bestest, same. And the Kardashians are the bestest bestest, same. Shut the lights off on the way out.

    Reply to: Suddenly 647,000 More Jobs Appear in the January Employment Report   11 years 9 months ago
    EPer:
  • The consequences of these lies have terrible consequences. The people out there without gigs, or that have businesses that are failing, or are struggling to find their first or second or third job one or thirty years out of school need to see that someone in power does know the truth and does work tirelessly to fix it. If the people with the rare good jobs or pulling in big $ on Wall Street keep denying their pain and the reality they are dealing with, then the people without the gigs will blame themselves because that's the message - "everything's getting better, so what's your problem?" If the TV spouts the mantra, and some segment of society parrots it, then the burden increases. It leads those people to feel they screwed up, they are marginalized, and denied any sympathy. Especially without food lines, meetings, the advent of the Internet, it breeds isolation.
    So should those denying the truth and marginalizing those suffering and blaming them be blamed themselves? Sure, why not, if they can be so callous towards other Americans, absolutely.

    Reply to: GDP Contracted -0.1% for Q4 2012!   11 years 10 months ago
    EPer:
  • If the media spouts trash and government lies, and the government ignores the problem because its controllers want it that way and pay the politicians to do as their told (which runs counter to what the populace wants), I'm guessing an ever-increasing number of people that live reality just don't put too much trust in anyone outside their own small circle of friends and family. Over a few years, it doesn't take a PhD in Sociology or History to figure out that breeds a whole lot of hate and distrust. It's like Saddam's PR man facing a camera and stating, "All is well, we're beating the enemy." Nope, reality at one's door is more compelling.

    Reply to: GDP Contracted -0.1% for Q4 2012!   11 years 10 months ago
    EPer:
  • Well, at least so far government statistics are reasonably objective, but that also is under attack. Right, the politicians even hire economists who are....politicians.

    Reply to: GDP Contracted -0.1% for Q4 2012!   11 years 10 months ago
    EPer:
  • 370k in initial claims does imply "moderate" hiring as in treading water hiring. I agree, the narrative by the press and especially politicians is to sweep the ongoing jobs crisis under the rug, along with the 20 million people suffering.

    We don't cover initial claims right before the monthly unemployment report but also January is weird month for claims in terms of seasonal adjustment issues. This report is just so overweighted by the press in terms of economic indicators. They want it to be a real time short window indicator and it's just not as we repeatedly warn about.

    Reply to: GDP Contracted -0.1% for Q4 2012!   11 years 10 months ago
    EPer:
  • GDP contracting, initial claims up (forgetting completely about people never eligible for benefits and those that fell off the rolls) and the MSM says, "The number of Americans seeking unemployment benefits rose sharply last week but remained at a level consistent with moderate hiring." USA Today today's toilet paper edition. Oh, indeed, "moderate" hiring (actually dismal hiring for part-time gigs with no benefits), recovery (year 4 or 5 of this "recovery"), and all is well in the Land of Make Believe. Ignore again labor participation rates at lows not seen since 1981, all is well. There's lies, damned lies, and the MSM and government.

    Reply to: GDP Contracted -0.1% for Q4 2012!   11 years 10 months ago
    EPer:
  • I don't think we are too far apart on how we view the housing recovery. I view it as a dead cat bounce, even if it looks like all cylinders are firing in the housing market. I don't think housing bubbles allow for V-shaped recoveries. The experience in the US, but especially in Japan which had a similar bust-up in the 90s, is for housing prices to lie pretty much dead in the water after bottoming. They can bounce up 10%, 25% or more, but eventually they at least retest the lows. This can go on for as long as the bubble existed. In US terms, our blastoff year for the bubble was 1996 and it peaked in 2006, so 2016 ought to be the time when we retest the lows. From there you could see either more bottom churning for years afterward, or a very slow rise from the lows. If housing in the US were lucky enough at that point to achieve a slow rise like it did from 1945 to 1996, the rate of increase would be similar to that of the CPI. Lately that has been 2% or less. Bear in mind during this period that the appreciation in the capital stock kept up with the rate of inflation but rarely exceeded it, which means that housing was a loser as an investment when you consider maintenance and taxes over all those years. Of course, housing provided shelter and living accomodations, access to schools, nice neighborhoods, etc., so the homeowner was on balance well-compensated. If you paid off the home after 25 years, you had some nice capital appreciation to make you feel wealthy, even though on balance you might have done better putting all that money every year in Treasuries.

    1996 was, not coincidentally, the year HELOCs took off. These transformed housing into a commodity that could be actively bought and sold without disposition of the actual property. The entire securitization craze, financed by Fannie Mae and made to look legitimate by MERS, was the icing on the cake that gave the bubble a firm foundation to grow. The question is, in 2016, will those favorable factors be put back in place to allow more rapid growth in housing than the CPI will permit? I doubt it, but to be sure, you need those things before you can postulate that the US can recreate the ten year bubble we just went through.

    Watch out for the stock market. It is flashing multiple danger signals and investors are displaying extraordinary complacency. Something is about to bust open soon and I am not sure what it is. It could be one of the things on my list above or something different, but it will either be about the Fed or put the Fed in an impossible situation. Jumping off the sequester cliff might be just the thing to drag down the economy in a big way.

    Another thing to consider, perhaps longer term when SHTF, is for a vicious cycle or feedback loop to be created regarding the Fed. The Fed could wind up sitting on $300 to $500 billion, or even more, of mark to market losses on its portfolio. It would technically be an insolvent institution, which would not disturb the market too much if the Treasury were willing to fork over cash to cover the hole in the balance sheet. But that just means more borrowing at a time when higher interest rates (which caused the Fed's losses) were signaling that the market was fed up with US borrowing. The alternative would then be to let the losses sit on the Fed's balance sheet for the next 20 years while the portfolio winds down. Here's where the feedback loop gets interesting. What does the Fed do about its Treasury portfolio? Does it demand repayment, causing the Treasury to borrow again? Does it agree to roll over the debt, buying replacement paper, which means the Fed is going to spend forever holding on to this debt? The point of this thought exercise is that there is no free lunch when the government buys its own paper. Looked at from a cash perspective, the Fed put cash into the banks to buy the paper. How does it get its cash back? It can't force the banks to buy the paper back again, so it has to force the Treasury to redeem the paper on maturity, which for the US will always mean borrowing more in the market since we don't have enough tax revenue to pay back the Fed. The $3 trillion portfolio, soon to be $4.1 trillion by the end of this year, will sit like a black hole for 20 years.

    Reply to: Financial Market Outlook for 2013   11 years 10 months ago
    EPer:
  • The reason the USSR fell was it simply refused to pare down its military spending despite the fact that it was crumbling internally - its industrial base was a sham. In addition, Afghanistan spending at the same time as it was trying to match Reagan's military spending brought it down. Massive military spending that refuses to come down, military personnel outside our borders, Afghanistan, crumbling industrial base = which country in 2013? Yeah, military spending may have to come down by a lot, but wasn't that the plan when we beat the USSR? Wasn't all that new money supposed to stay within the US and build bridges, roads, better schools, better power grids? Of course it was.

    Yet DOD spending keeps up because there's always another war, always another threat, etc. If it comes down, so it comes down. Let that money not come out of taxpayers' shrinking pocketbooks in the first place, and if it is taken in taxes, then let those taxes be spent on butter and books, not guns and tanks. Examine the DOD spending, it's not like the personnel on the ground are pulling in big bucks. In fact, many of them require govt. assistance, struggle. So where's the money go? Why do contracts cost so much money, take so long to be implemented, suffer endless protests so everyone gets a piece of the pie or ties it up for years so they can share a piece of it? Cut it, because like the USSR from 1979 - 1989, and the Brits in the early 20th Century and the Roman Empire in the 4th Century, we cannot afford it anymore, especially when we have to borrow money from China to spend money on defense from China and adventures in Mali and elsewhere? Yeah, it's that obvious and ridiculous.

    Reply to: GDP Contracted -0.1% for Q4 2012!   11 years 10 months ago
    EPer:

Pages